Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026

UPM RAFLATAC OY

4 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 5 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
0
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (50%)
1
Medium (25%)
1
Easy (25%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (25%)
§112 only1 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WALSHON, SCOTT R 3 50.9% +20.8%
DICUS, TAMRA 1 30.4% +21.8%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18112007 LINERLESS LABEL AND METHOD FOR PREPARING A LABEL WALSHON, SCOTT R 71d overdue
18387108 RELEASE LINER AND A LABEL LAMINATE WALSHON, SCOTT R 51d overdue

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18112007 LINERLESS LABEL AND METHOD FOR PREPARING A LABEL WALSHON, SCOTT R 71d overdue
18387108 RELEASE LINER AND A LABEL LAMINATE WALSHON, SCOTT R 51d overdue
18266648 Acrylic pressure sensitive adhesive composition for food packaging label application DICUS, TAMRA
17927177 RECYCLABLE PLASTIC LABEL WALSHON, SCOTT R

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1759 3
1787 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18387108 RELEASE LINER AND A LABEL LAMINATE WALSHON, SCOTT R 1759 §103§112 Final Rejection 51d overdue Pending Nov 06, 2023
18266648 Acrylic pressure sensitive adhesive composition for food packaging label application DICUS, TAMRA 1787 §103 Final Rejection Pending Jun 12, 2023
18112007 LINERLESS LABEL AND METHOD FOR PREPARING A LABEL WALSHON, SCOTT R 1759 §103§112Other Final Rejection 71d overdue Pending Feb 21, 2023
17927177 RECYCLABLE PLASTIC LABEL WALSHON, SCOTT R 1759 §112 Final Rejection Pending Nov 22, 2022

Managing UPM RAFLATAC OY's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month