Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

UPM RAFLATAC OY

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

6 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 6 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

UPM RAFLATAC OY is managing 6 pending office actions within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These cases are spread across 3 distinct art units and involve 4 distinct examiners. The distribution of 6 pending office actions across 3 distinct art units indicates that the company's technical filings are somewhat diversified within the chemistry sector. With 4 distinct examiners involved, the company must manage multiple examiner relationships simultaneously. This variety in assignments suggests that the company's prosecution outcomes are not dependent on a single individual's review.

DUCHENEAUX, FRANK D is the busiest examiner for the company, handling 2 pending office actions. This leaves the remaining 4 pending office actions to be distributed among the other 3 distinct examiners. The involvement of 3 distinct art units suggests that the company faces a variety of technical expertise and examination styles. Practitioners should be prepared to adapt their prosecution strategies to the specific nuances of these 3 distinct art units and the 4 distinct examiners currently reviewing the company's applications. This profile reflects a moderately distributed workload across several technical divisions.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
2
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (50%)
2
Medium (33%)
1
Easy (17%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (33%)
§112 only1 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

6
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
DUCHENEAUX, FRANK D 2 45.0% -13.9%
WALSHON, SCOTT R 2 51.3% +20.6%
DESAI, ANISH P 1 45.3% +6.9%
DICUS, TAMRA 1 30.5% +21.4%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18112007 LINERLESS LABEL AND METHOD FOR PREPARING A LABEL WALSHON, SCOTT R 71d overdue
18387108 RELEASE LINER AND A LABEL LAMINATE WALSHON, SCOTT R 51d overdue
18864459 LINERLESS LABEL DUCHENEAUX, FRANK D —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18112007 LINERLESS LABEL AND METHOD FOR PREPARING A LABEL WALSHON, SCOTT R 71d overdue
18387108 RELEASE LINER AND A LABEL LAMINATE WALSHON, SCOTT R 51d overdue
18266648 Acrylic pressure sensitive adhesive composition for food packaging label application DICUS, TAMRA —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1788 3
1759 2
1787 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19089531 LINERLESS LABEL DUCHENEAUX, FRANK D 1788 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 25, 2025
18864459 LINERLESS LABEL DUCHENEAUX, FRANK D 1788 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 08, 2024
18399979 WASH-OFF LABEL DESAI, ANISH P 1788 §103Other Final Rejection 36d Pending Dec 29, 2023
18387108 RELEASE LINER AND A LABEL LAMINATE WALSHON, SCOTT R 1759 §103§112 Non-Final OA 51d overdue Pending Nov 06, 2023
18266648 Acrylic pressure sensitive adhesive composition for food packaging label application DICUS, TAMRA 1787 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 12, 2023
18112007 LINERLESS LABEL AND METHOD FOR PREPARING A LABEL WALSHON, SCOTT R 1759 §103§112Other Final Rejection 71d overdue Pending Feb 21, 2023

Managing UPM RAFLATAC OY's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month