Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Vornado Air LLC

5 pending office actions • 3 art units • 5 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 19 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
1
Due this week
0
Due this month
2
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 7 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
5
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only4 (80%)
§102 only1 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
100% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
FLORES, JUAN G 1 79.2% +14.7%
BOBISH, CHRISTOPHER S 1 62.2% +29.3%
HERRMANN, JOSEPH S 1 63.4% +41.4%
PRUITT, JUSTIN A 1 62.5% +14.8%
TREMARCHE, CONNOR J. 1 65.1% +28.2%

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17956747 Window Fan TREMARCHE, CONNOR J. 72d overdue
18778419 Fan HERRMANN, JOSEPH S 51d overdue
18771772 FAN PRUITT, JUSTIN A 6d
19209674 Fan BOBISH, CHRISTOPHER S 34d
19239761 Fan FLORES, JUAN G 35d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3745 2
3746 2
3762 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19239761 Fan FLORES, JUAN G 3745 §102 Non-Final OA 35d Pending Jun 16, 2025
19209674 Fan BOBISH, CHRISTOPHER S 3746 §103 Non-Final OA 34d Pending May 15, 2025
18778419 Fan HERRMANN, JOSEPH S 3746 §103 Final Rejection 51d overdue Pending Jul 19, 2024
18771772 FAN PRUITT, JUSTIN A 3745 §103 Final Rejection 6d Pending Jul 12, 2024
17956747 Window Fan TREMARCHE, CONNOR J. 3762 §103 Non-Final OA 72d overdue Pending Sep 29, 2022

Managing Vornado Air LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month