Prosecution Insights
Last updated: May 29, 2026

Wichita State University

4 pending office actions • 3 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 8 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

4
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
2
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)Due later (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
4
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only4 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
25% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
75% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

40 h
Manual time on pending OAs
8 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
14 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.3 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SENGUPTA, SONYA MAZUMDAR 1 68.3% +20.1%
SAMUELS, LAWRENCE H 1 56.0% +38.6%
CHEN, KUANGYUE 1 63.5% +45.1%
SOTO, CHRISTOPHER ASHLEY 1 53.1% +29.3%

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18046530 INDUCTION WELDING MODULE SAMUELS, LAWRENCE H 20d
18431479 MARKER TRANSFER TAPE AND METHOD OF APPLYING MARKERS SENGUPTA, SONYA MAZUMDAR 41d
17180000 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATED SANDING SOTO, CHRISTOPHER ASHLEY 69d
17933499 RESISTANCE WELDING APPARATUS AND METHOD CHEN, KUANGYUE 71d

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3761 2
1745 1
3723 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18431479 MARKER TRANSFER TAPE AND METHOD OF APPLYING MARKERS SENGUPTA, SONYA MAZUMDAR 1745 §103 Non-Final OA 41d Pending Feb 02, 2024
18046530 INDUCTION WELDING MODULE SAMUELS, LAWRENCE H 3761 §103 Non-Final OA 20d Pending Oct 14, 2022
17933499 RESISTANCE WELDING APPARATUS AND METHOD CHEN, KUANGYUE 3761 §103 Non-Final OA 71d Pending Sep 20, 2022
17180000 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATED SANDING SOTO, CHRISTOPHER ASHLEY 3723 §103 Final Rejection 69d Pending Feb 19, 2021

Managing Wichita State University's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month