Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 16, 2026

Wichita State University

9 pending office actions • 8 art units • 9 examiners • 0 of 9 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 6 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

9
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
2
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Due ≤ 60 days (1)Due later (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

9
Hard (100%)
0
Medium (0%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Multi-statute (no §101)9 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

4
Life Sciences
44% of docket
1
Information Tech
11% of docket
1
Communications
11% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
22% of docket
1
Business / Other
11% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

90 h
Manual time on pending OAs
18 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
31 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.8 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HARM, NICKOLAS R 1 79.3% +5.9%
RUMMEL, JULIA L 1 34.7% +52.3%
THROWER, LARRY W 1 65.8% +12.9%
SHOLEMAN, ABU S 1 78.6% +27.4%
KUDO, KEN 1
SENGUPTA, SONYA MAZUMDAR 1 68.6% +20.1%
PARENT, ALEXANDER RENE 1 55.3% +16.7%
CHEN, KUANGYUE 1 63.0% +45.9%
SOTO, CHRISTOPHER ASHLEY 1 52.9% +30.0%

Hard Cases (9)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18431479 MARKER TRANSFER TAPE AND METHOD OF APPLYING MARKERS SENGUPTA, SONYA MAZUMDAR 41d
17180000 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATED SANDING SOTO, CHRISTOPHER ASHLEY 69d
17933499 RESISTANCE WELDING APPARATUS AND METHOD CHEN, KUANGYUE 71d
19091259 ENERGY DIRECTOR FOR ULTRASONIC WELDING OF THERMOPLASTIC COMPOSITES HARM, NICKOLAS R
18918845 INFLATABLE STRUCTURE AND METHOD OF MAKING INFLATABLE STRUCTURE RUMMEL, JULIA L
18775113 SYSTEMS FOR FIBER GUIDANCE THROWER, LARRY W
18747127 DOUBLE-LAYER ENCRYPTION FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS SHOLEMAN, ABU S
18439757 IN-PROCESS INSPECTION FOR AUTOMATED FIBER PLACEMENT KUDO, KEN

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18431479 MARKER TRANSFER TAPE AND METHOD OF APPLYING MARKERS SENGUPTA, SONYA MAZUMDAR 41d
17180000 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATED SANDING SOTO, CHRISTOPHER ASHLEY 69d
17933499 RESISTANCE WELDING APPARATUS AND METHOD CHEN, KUANGYUE 71d
18918845 INFLATABLE STRUCTURE AND METHOD OF MAKING INFLATABLE STRUCTURE RUMMEL, JULIA L
18775113 SYSTEMS FOR FIBER GUIDANCE THROWER, LARRY W
18747127 DOUBLE-LAYER ENCRYPTION FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS SHOLEMAN, ABU S
18304149 COBALT-COATED ELECTRODES PARENT, ALEXANDER RENE

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1784 1
1754 1
2496 1
2671 1
1745 1
1795 1
3761 1
3723 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19091259 ENERGY DIRECTOR FOR ULTRASONIC WELDING OF THERMOPLASTIC COMPOSITES HARM, NICKOLAS R §102§103§112 Non-Final OA Pending Mar 26, 2025
18918845 INFLATABLE STRUCTURE AND METHOD OF MAKING INFLATABLE STRUCTURE RUMMEL, JULIA L 1784 §103§112 Non-Final OA Pending Oct 17, 2024
18775113 SYSTEMS FOR FIBER GUIDANCE THROWER, LARRY W 1754 §102§103 Final Rejection Pending Jul 17, 2024
18747127 DOUBLE-LAYER ENCRYPTION FOR WIRELESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEMS SHOLEMAN, ABU S 2496 §102§103§112 Final Rejection Pending Jun 18, 2024
18439757 IN-PROCESS INSPECTION FOR AUTOMATED FIBER PLACEMENT KUDO, KEN 2671 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA Pending Feb 12, 2024
18431479 MARKER TRANSFER TAPE AND METHOD OF APPLYING MARKERS SENGUPTA, SONYA MAZUMDAR 1745 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 41d Pending Feb 02, 2024
18304149 COBALT-COATED ELECTRODES PARENT, ALEXANDER RENE 1795 §103§112 Final Rejection Pending Apr 20, 2023
17933499 RESISTANCE WELDING APPARATUS AND METHOD CHEN, KUANGYUE 3761 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 71d Pending Sep 20, 2022
17180000 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR AUTOMATED SANDING SOTO, CHRISTOPHER ASHLEY 3723 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 69d Pending Feb 19, 2021

Managing Wichita State University's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month