Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 01, 2026

Examiner: FINDLEY, CHRISTOPHER G

Tech Center 2600 • Art Units: 2482 2621

This examiner grants 78% of resolved cases

Analysis

Christopher G. Findley is an examiner in Tech Center 2600 and Art Unit 2482. He has reached a resolution in 777 cases. The data shows an allowance rate of 77.9 percent for these applications. This percentage indicates that more than three-quarters of the cases assigned to him result in a patent grant. Practitioners can use this 77.9 percent rate to gauge the generally positive outlook for applications in this technology area.

The impact of interviews on prosecution outcomes is shown by an interview lift of 11.6 percent. This metric suggests that direct communication with the examiner provides a notable increase in the probability of allowance. An interview lift of 11.6 percent indicates that verbal negotiation is a productive strategy for addressing rejections and clarifying claim language. Practitioners should consider scheduling an interview to leverage this potential benefit.

The median days to allowance for successful cases is 1079. This duration represents the middle value of the time taken from filing to the issuance of a patent. A median of 1079 days provides a specific timeline for applicants to consider when managing their patent portfolios. These metrics are based on 777 resolved cases, offering a data-grounded perspective on the examiner's historical prosecution patterns.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Performance Statistics

77.9%
Allow Rate
+15.9% vs TC avg
804
Total Applications
+11.6%
Interview Lift
1079
Avg Prosecution Days
Based on 777 resolved cases, 2023–2026

Rejection Statute Breakdown

4.7%
§101 Eligibility
23.2%
§102 Novelty
56.7%
§103 Obviousness
4.7%
§112 Clarity

Currently Pending Office Actions

App #TitleStatusAssignee
19045833 THREE-DIMENSIONAL DATA ENCODING METHOD, THREE-DIMENSIONAL DATA DECODING METHOD, THREE-DIMENSIONAL DATA ENCODING DEVICE, AND THREE-DIMENSIONAL DATA DECODING DEVICE Final Rejection Panasonic Intellectual Property Corporation of America
19251891 Sign Derivation in Block Vector Difference Signaling Non-Final OA Ofinno, LLC
19301810 REFERENCE PICTURE BOUNDARY EXTENSION BY EXTRAPOLATION Non-Final OA Tencent America LLC
18937174 VIDEO ENCODING/DECODING METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR PERFORMING PDPC AND METHOD FOR TRANSMITTING BITSTREAM Non-Final OA Nokia Technologies Oy
18727516 Method and Apparatus Deriving Merge Candidate from Affine Coded Blocks for Video Coding Non-Final OA MEDIATEK INC.
19022542 Motion Compensation Recoloring of Point Clouds Final Rejection Comcast Cable Communications, LLC
19242345 CODING AND DECODING OF VIDEO CODING MODES Non-Final OA Bytedance Inc.
18763948 METHOD, APPARATUS, AND MEDIUM FOR VIDEO PROCESSING Non-Final OA Bytedance Inc.
19334682 VIDEO SIGNAL ENCODING AND DECODING METHOD, AND APPARATUS THEREFOR Non-Final OA Guangdong Oppo Mobile Telecommunications Corp., LTD.
19334688 VIDEO SIGNAL ENCODING AND DECODING METHOD, AND APPARATUS THEREFOR Non-Final OA GUANGDONG OPPO MOBILE TELECOMMUNICATIONS CORP., LTD.
18798466 FRAME SELECTION FOR STREAMING APPLICATIONS Final Rejection Nvidia Corporation
19247613 ENDOSCOPE LIGHTING CONTROL WITH CAMERA EXTENSION Non-Final OA COOK MEDICAL TECHNOLOGIES LLC

Facing This Examiner?

IP Author analyzes examiner patterns and generates tailored response strategies with the highest chance of allowance.

Build Your Strategy

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month