Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026

Nathan K Ford, USPTO Patent Examiner

Listed by the USPTO as FORD, NATHAN K

Tech Center 1700 • Art Units: 1712 1716 1718 1792

This examiner grants 33% of resolved cases

Analysis

FORD, NATHAN K has resolved 677 cases in tech center 1700 and art unit 1712. The allowance rate is 32.6%, and the median time to allowance is 1605 days. The profile reflects a lower allowance outcome and the longest median prosecution timeline in the supplied data, making early evaluation of claim scope and fallback positions important.

Interviews correspond to a 35.2% lift in allowance outcomes. Lam Research Corporation, Applied Materials Inc., and ASM IP Holding B.V. are the leading companies listed. Snell & Wilmer (ASM IP Holding B.V.), OSTROLENK FABER LLP, and Anova Law Group, PLLC are the leading firms shown. These conditions support deliberate interview and amendment planning.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Performance Statistics

32.6%
Allow Rate
-32.4% vs TC avg
731
Total Applications
+35.2%
Interview Lift
1605
Avg Prosecution Days
Based on 677 resolved cases, 2023–2026

Rejection Statute Breakdown

0.3%
§101 Eligibility
15.5%
§102 Novelty
57.6%
§103 Obviousness
24.4%
§112 Clarity

Currently Pending Office Actions

App #TitleStatusAssignee
18642124 INDUCTIVELY COUPLED PLASMA PROCESSING APPARATUS Non-Final OA SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
18303833 METHOD OF FABRICATING AN ELECTRODE STRUCTURE AND APPARATUS FOR FABRICATING THE ELECTRODE STRUCTURE Non-Final OA Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.
18733178 MASK FRAME AND MASK ASSEMBLY HAVING THE SAME Non-Final OA Samsung Display Co., LTD.
18522152 LOAD LOCK ARRANGEMENTS, SEMICONDUCTOR PROCESSING SYSTEMS HAVING LOAD LOCK ARRANGEMENTS, AND METHODS OF MAKING LOAD LOCKS FOR SEMICONDUCTOR PROCESSING SYSTEMS Final Rejection ASM IP Holding B.V.
17971829 PLASMA CVD APPARATUS WITH A BEVEL MASK WITH A PLANAR INNER EDGE Final Rejection ASM IP Holding B.V.
17948674 SYSTEM AND APPARATUS FOR GAS DISTRIBUTION Non-Final OA ASM IP Holding, B.V.
17739493 CVD APPARATUS AND FILM FORMING METHOD Non-Final OA ASM IP Holding B.V.
18465113 APPARATUSES AND METHODS FOR AVOIDING ELECTRICAL BREAKDOWN FROM RF TERMINAL TO ADJACENT NON-RF TERMINAL Non-Final OA Lam Research Corporation
18017208 THIN SHADOW RING FOR LOW-TILT TRENCH ETCHING Final Rejection LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION
18011707 DRY BACKSIDE AND BEVEL EDGE CLEAN OF PHOTORESIST Final Rejection Lam Research Corporation
17904005 COOLING PLATE FOR SEMICONDUCTOR PROCESSING CHAMBER WINDOW Non-Final OA Lam Research Corporation
17419841 METAL ATOMIC LAYER ETCH AND DEPOSITION APPARATUSES AND PROCESSES WITH METAL-FREE LIGANDS Non-Final OA LAM RESEARCH CORPORATION
17872498 Equipment For Manufacturing Light-Emitting Device and Light-Receiving Device Final Rejection Semiconductor Energy Laboratory Co., Ltd.
17736048 SUBSTRATE PROCESSING METHOD AND SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS Non-Final OA Tokyo Electron Limited
18538100 CHAMBER AND METHODS FOR DOWNSTREAM RESIDUE MANAGEMENT Final Rejection Applied Materials, Inc.
18239988 In-Vacuum Rotatable RF Component Final Rejection Applied Materials, Inc.
18223183 SINGLE PIECE OR TWO PIECE SUSCEPTOR Final Rejection Applied Materials, Inc.
18168168 PROCESSING SYSTEM AND METHODS TO CO-STRIKE PLASMA TO ENHANCE TUNGSTEN GROWTH INCUBATION DELAY Final Rejection Applied Materials, Inc.
18095262 MODULAR PRECURSOR DELIVERY AND SPLITTING FOR FAST SWITCHING Final Rejection Applied Materials, Inc.
19126547 SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS AND SUBSTRATE PROCESSING METHOD Non-Final OA SCREEN Holdings Co., Ltd.
18742608 SUBSTRATE TREATING APPARATUS AND SUBSTRATE TRANSPORTING METHOD Non-Final OA SCREEN Holdings Co., Ltd.

Facing This Examiner?

IP Author analyzes examiner patterns and generates tailored response strategies with the highest chance of allowance.

Build Your Strategy

Who Appears Before This Examiner

Top companies before this examiner

Law firms appearing most often

Frequently Asked Questions

What is examiner Nathan K Ford's allowance rate?

32.6% of resolved applications examined by Nathan K Ford were allowed (677 resolved cases), compared with 43.3% across Art Unit 1712 over the last five years.

Does an interview help with examiner Nathan K Ford?

This examiner's interview lift is +35.2 percentage points: the difference in allowance rate between resolved applications that had an examiner interview and those that did not.

How long does examiner Nathan K Ford take to allow a patent?

Applications allowed by Nathan K Ford took 1,605 days on average from filing to allowance.

Which art unit does examiner Nathan K Ford work in?

Nathan K Ford examines applications in Art Unit 1712 in Tech Center 1700 (Chemistry & Materials).

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month