Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Nields, Lemack & Frame, LLC - Varian

Technology area: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

6 pending office actions • 1 client • 6 examiners • 4 art units • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 24 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Nields, Lemack & Frame, LLC - Varian records 6 pending office actions in Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics and 283 career applications. The profile shows a contained active docket with a focused historical application record.

The resolved allowance rate is 97.06%, and the average office actions per allowance is 2.72. The allowance figure indicates that nearly all resolved matters reached allowance, while the action average shows that allowed matters still involved recurring examination activity.

For practitioners, the profile supports close review of how semiconductor and circuit claims were distinguished and advanced. The pending matters should be assessed individually, with attention to technical evidence, claim amendments, and the relationship between examination persistence and eventual allowance.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=283 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

97.1%
Allowance Rate
n=283
+0.72σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=283
2.7
OAs to Allowance
n=231
-0.51σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=231
852 days
Time to Allowance
n=231
-4.2pp
Interview Lift
n=283
24.4%
RCE Rate
n=283
0.5%
Appeal Rate
n=283

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=2 (min 20)
87.5%
§102 Overcome
n=96
86.5%
§103 Overcome
n=163
82.6%
§112 Overcome
n=69

Specialization & Scale

H01J, H01L, H10P
Top CPC Subclasses
64%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=283
0
Practitioners
n=283
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=283 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (67%)
2
Medium (33%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (17%)
§102 only1 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (67%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
17% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
5
Semiconductors
83% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KING, MONICA C 1 84.6% +6.6%
VANORE, DAVID A 1 88.8% +7.6%
LOGIE, MICHAEL J 1 63.1% +9.5%
FORD, NATHAN K 1 32.6% +35.2%
GOURLIE, LAURA ELOISE 1 68.8% +33.3%
STOFFA, WYATT A 1 79.3% +22.3%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19261609 ION SOURCE FOR CONTROLLING DECOMPOSITION BUILDUP USING CHLORINE CO-GAS KING, MONICA C —

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18239988 In-Vacuum Rotatable RF Component FORD, NATHAN K 29d
18633764 Detection of Space Charge Effect During Ion Implantation VANORE, DAVID A —
18387987 XRAY DIFFRACTION ANGLE VERIFICATION IN AN ION IMPLANTER LOGIE, MICHAEL J —
17740848 HYBRID ION SOURCE FOR ALUMINUM ION GENERATION USING A TARGET HOLDER AND ORGANOALUMINIUM COMPOUNDS STOFFA, WYATT A —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18107819 System and Method for Reducing Particle Formation in a Process Chamber of an Ion Implanter GOURLIE, LAURA ELOISE 43d overdue
18239988 In-Vacuum Rotatable RF Component FORD, NATHAN K 29d
17740848 HYBRID ION SOURCE FOR ALUMINUM ION GENERATION USING A TARGET HOLDER AND ORGANOALUMINIUM COMPOUNDS STOFFA, WYATT A —

Client Portfolio (1 client)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Applied Materials 6

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
28813
28451
28781
17161

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19261609 ION SOURCE FOR CONTROLLING DECOMPOSITION BUILDUP USING CHLORINE CO-GAS Applied Materials, Inc. KING, MONICA C 2845 §102Other Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 07, 2025
18633764 Detection of Space Charge Effect During Ion Implantation Applied Materials, Inc. VANORE, DAVID A 2878 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 12, 2024
18387987 XRAY DIFFRACTION ANGLE VERIFICATION IN AN ION IMPLANTER Applied Materials, Inc. LOGIE, MICHAEL J 2881 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 08, 2023
18239988 In-Vacuum Rotatable RF Component Applied Materials, Inc. FORD, NATHAN K 1716 §102§103 Final Rejection 29d Pending Aug 30, 2023
18107819 System and Method for Reducing Particle Formation in a Process Chamber of an Ion Implanter Applied Materials, Inc. GOURLIE, LAURA ELOISE 2881 §103 Final Rejection 43d overdue Pending Feb 09, 2023
17740848 HYBRID ION SOURCE FOR ALUMINUM ION GENERATION USING A TARGET HOLDER AND ORGANOALUMINIUM COMPOUNDS Applied Materials, Inc. STOFFA, WYATT A 2881 §102§103Other Non-Final OA — Pending May 10, 2022

Managing Nields, Lemack & Frame, LLC - Varian's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Nields, Lemack & Frame, LLC - Varian's patent allowance rate?

97.1% of resolved applications prosecuted by Nields, Lemack & Frame, LLC - Varian were allowed, across 283 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Nields, Lemack & Frame, LLC - Varian average before allowance?

2.72 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Nields, Lemack & Frame, LLC - Varian have?

6 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 1 client, before 6 examiners in 4 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month