Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 27, 2026

Omar M Kekia, USPTO Patent Examiner

Listed by the USPTO as KEKIA, OMAR M

Tech Center 1700 • Art Units: 1721 1722 1725

This examiner grants 68% of resolved cases

Analysis

KEKIA, OMAR M is a USPTO patent examiner in tech center 1700 and art unit 1721. The profile records 520 resolved cases, an allowance rate of 67.5%, and a median of 1163 days to allowance. The interview lift is 22.2%, providing a measurable reason to include interview preparation in prosecution planning when the claims present issues that can be clarified directly.

The leading companies are LG Energy Solution Ltd., Panasonic Holdings Corporation, and Contemporary Amperex Technology Co., Limited. The leading firms are BIRCH STEWART KOLASCH & BIRCH, LLP, Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner LLP (DC), and Bridgeway IP Law Group, PLLC. The timing figure supports beginning substantive review early, particularly for matters where claim scope, support, and technical distinctions may require iterative responses.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Performance Statistics

67.5%
Allow Rate
+2.5% vs TC avg
567
Total Applications
+22.2%
Interview Lift
1163
Avg Prosecution Days
Based on 520 resolved cases, 2023–2026

Rejection Statute Breakdown

0.2%
§101 Eligibility
18.8%
§102 Novelty
61.4%
§103 Obviousness
15.9%
§112 Clarity

Currently Pending Office Actions

App #TitleStatusAssignee
17926459 CYLINDRICAL BATTERY Non-Final OA SANYO Electric Co., Ltd.
18677211 Secondary Battery Non-Final OA LG Energy Solution, Ltd.
18694669 LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY COMPRISING SEPARATOR Non-Final OA LG Energy Solution, Ltd.
18693753 Battery Module and Battery Pack Including the Same Non-Final OA LG Energy Solution, Ltd.
18692702 SECONDARY BATTERY HAVING IMPROVED TERMINAL STRUCTURE Non-Final OA LG ENERGY SOLUTION, LTD.
18289486 CYLINDRICAL SECONDARY BATTERY TO WHICH LASER WELDING IS APPLIED AND FABRICATING METHOD THEREOF, BATTERY PACK AND VEHICLE INCLUDING THE SAME Non-Final OA LG ENERGY SOLUTION, LTD.
18280898 COOLING FIN, BATTERY MODULE, BATTERY PACK AND DEVICE INCLUDING THE SAME Final Rejection LG ENERGY SOLUTION, LTD.
18271007 METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING LITHIUM SECONDARY BATTERY Final Rejection LG ENERGY SOLUTION, LTD.
18345515 BATTERY PACK AND ELECTRICAL DEVICE CONTAINING SAME Non-Final OA CONTEMPORARY AMPEREX TECHNOLOGY (HONG KONG) LIMITED
18280549 POLYELECTROLYTE MOLDED BODY, AND POLYELECTROLYTE MEMBRANE, ELECTROLYTE MEMBRANE WITH CATALYST LAYER, MEMBRANE ELECTRODE ASSEMBLY, SOLID POLYMER-TYPE FUEL CELL, AND WATER ELECTROLYSIS-STYLE HYDROGEN PRODUCTION DEVICE IN WHICH SAID POLYELECTROLYTE MOLDED BODY IS USED Final Rejection TORAY INDUSTRIES, INC.
18326000 SECONDARY BATTERY, APPARATUS FOR PROCESSING SECONDARY DEVICE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING SECONDARY BATTERY Final Rejection SK ON CO., LTD.
18693915 FUEL CELL Non-Final OA L'Air Liquide, Societe Anonyme pour l'Etude et l’Exploitation des Procedes Georges Claude
18015956 PASTE FOR PREPARING BIODEGRADABLE ELECTROCEUTICAL, BIODEGRADABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICE FORMED USING SAME AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREFOR, AND BIODEGRADABLE ELECTROCEUTICAL AND PREPARATION METHOD THEREFOR Final Rejection SEOUL NATIONAL UNIVERSITY R&DB FOUNDATION
18176518 BATTERY Non-Final OA PRIME PLANET ENERGY & SOLUTIONS, INC.
17787469 NONAQUEOUS ELECTROLYTE ENERGY STORAGE DEVICE AND METHOD FOR MANUFACTURING THE SAME Final Rejection GS YUASA INTERNATIONAL LTD.
18463379 BUTTON CELL HAVING WINDING ELECTRODE AND METHOD FOR THE PRODUCTION THEREOF Final Rejection VARTA Microbattery GmbH

Facing This Examiner?

IP Author analyzes examiner patterns and generates tailored response strategies with the highest chance of allowance.

Build Your Strategy

Who Appears Before This Examiner

Top companies before this examiner

Law firms appearing most often

Frequently Asked Questions

What is examiner Omar M Kekia's allowance rate?

67.5% of resolved applications examined by Omar M Kekia were allowed (520 resolved cases), compared with 40.6% across Art Unit 1721 over the last five years.

Does an interview help with examiner Omar M Kekia?

This examiner's interview lift is +22.2 percentage points: the difference in allowance rate between resolved applications that had an examiner interview and those that did not.

How long does examiner Omar M Kekia take to allow a patent?

Applications allowed by Omar M Kekia took 1,163 days on average from filing to allowance.

Which art unit does examiner Omar M Kekia work in?

Omar M Kekia examines applications in Art Unit 1721 in Tech Center 1700 (Chemistry & Materials).

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month