Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026

Curtis James Kortman, USPTO Patent Examiner

Listed by the USPTO as KORTMAN, CURTIS JAMES

Tech Center 2100 • Art Units: 2139

This examiner grants 80% of resolved cases

Analysis

Curtis James Kortman examines cases in Tech Center 2100 and Art Unit 2139, with 229 resolved cases to date. His allowance rate of 79.5% indicates the frequency of patent grants. The median days to allowance is 800, which serves as a benchmark for the prosecution timeline. Major technology companies like Micron Technology Inc., SanDisk Technologies Inc., and Pure Storage Inc. are frequently seen in the 229 resolved cases. The 79.5% allowance rate provides a baseline for success in Art Unit 2139.

The data also reveals an interview lift of 24.1%. This 24.1% lift provides a boost to the 79.5% allowance rate, suggesting that direct engagement is effective. Firms such as AGORA LAW GROUP, PLLC, BROOKS, CAMERON & HUEBSCH, PLLC, and FISH & RICHARD P.C. (TC) should take advantage of this lift to secure grants. With 229 resolved cases, the examiner's profile demonstrates responsiveness to interviews. The 800-day median pendency is a reliable benchmark for planning in this art unit.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Performance Statistics

79.5%
Allow Rate
+24.5% vs TC avg
259
Total Applications
+24.1%
Interview Lift
800
Avg Prosecution Days
Based on 229 resolved cases, 2023–2026

Rejection Statute Breakdown

8.7%
§101 Eligibility
7.6%
§102 Novelty
44.9%
§103 Obviousness
33.2%
§112 Clarity

Currently Pending Office Actions

App #TitleStatusAssignee
18767619 STORAGE DEVICE AND OPERATION METHOD THEREOF Final Rejection SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
19067578 ESTIMATING A REMAINING LIFESPAN OF A STORAGE DEVICE Final Rejection PURE STORAGE, INC.
18958952 COORDINATION SNAPSHOTS IN A DISTRIBUTED STORAGE SYSTEM Non-Final OA PURE STORAGE, INC.
19065649 ENHANCED REGION TAGGING Final Rejection QUALCOMM Incorporated
19302401 MEMORY SYSTEM CHARACTERISTIC CONTROL Non-Final OA Micron Technology, Inc.
19301737 MAXIMUM ROW ACTIVE TIME ENFORCEMENT FOR MEMORY DEVICES Non-Final OA Micron Technology, Inc.
19249564 MEMORY CHIP TEST PAD ACCESS MANAGEMENT TO FACILITATE DATA SECURITY Non-Final OA Micron Technology, Inc.
19044094 Logical to Physical Translation Table Adapted to Facilitate Tracking of Data of a Storage Space of a Memory Sub-System Cached or Buffered in a Memory Space of the Memory Sub-System Non-Final OA Micron Technology, Inc.
19020825 READ COUNTER FOR QUALITY OF SERVICE DESIGN Non-Final OA Micron Technology, Inc.
18950828 DIFFERENTIAL WORDLINE SCAN IN A MEMORY SUB-SYSTEM Non-Final OA Micron Technology, Inc.
18772878 DATA THROUGHPUT USING TCM Non-Final OA Micron Technology, Inc.
19299798 MEMORY SYSTEM AND METHOD OF CONTROLLING NONVOLATILE MEMORY Non-Final OA KIOXIA CORPORATION
18507936 MEMORY MANAGEMENT APPARATUS, MEMORY MANAGEMENT METHOD, PROCESSOR, AND COMPUTER SYSTEM Final Rejection Alibaba Group Holding Limited
19248215 CONTROLLER AND STORAGE DEVICE INCLUDING DATA STRUCTURE INFORMATION CORRESPONDING TO MAP DATA Non-Final OA SK hynix Inc.
18463041 METHODS, SYSTEMS, AND APPARATUSES FOR SHREDDING DATA Final Rejection STMicroelectronics International N.V.

Facing This Examiner?

IP Author analyzes examiner patterns and generates tailored response strategies with the highest chance of allowance.

Build Your Strategy

Who Appears Before This Examiner

Top companies before this examiner

Law firms appearing most often

Frequently Asked Questions

What is examiner Curtis James Kortman's allowance rate?

79.5% of resolved applications examined by Curtis James Kortman were allowed (229 resolved cases), compared with 76.6% across Art Unit 2139 over the last five years.

Does an interview help with examiner Curtis James Kortman?

This examiner's interview lift is +24.1 percentage points: the difference in allowance rate between resolved applications that had an examiner interview and those that did not.

How long does examiner Curtis James Kortman take to allow a patent?

Applications allowed by Curtis James Kortman took 800 days on average from filing to allowance.

Which art unit does examiner Curtis James Kortman work in?

Curtis James Kortman examines applications in Art Unit 2139 in Tech Center 2100 (Computing & Software).

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month