Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Examiner: RAMESH, TIRUMALE K

Tech Center 2800 • Art Units: 2121 2125 2872

This examiner grants 26% of resolved cases

Analysis

Tirumale K Ramesh handles cases in Tech Center 2800 and Art Unit 2121. The data shows a total of 49 resolved cases. The allowance rate stands at 26.5 percent, indicating the probability of applications reaching a grant. Furthermore, the median days to allowance is 1730, suggesting that successful applications face a specific duration before reaching a final grant. This 1730-day timeline is a key consideration for applicants in this unit.

Despite the 26.5 percent allowance rate, the interview lift of 23.7 percent offers a potential tactical advantage. Engaging in an interview may improve the baseline probability of success. Practitioners should prepare for a long-term engagement, as the 1730-day median timeline requires persistence. The 23.7 percent lift suggests that verbal communication is a productive use of resources for the 49 resolved cases. Applicants can use these figures to set expectations for prosecution in Art Unit 2121.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Performance Statistics

26.5%
Allow Rate
-41.5% vs TC avg
85
Total Applications
+23.7%
Interview Lift
1730
Avg Prosecution Days
Based on 49 resolved cases, 2023–2026

Rejection Statute Breakdown

26.8%
§101 Eligibility
4.2%
§102 Novelty
63.9%
§103 Obviousness
4.6%
§112 Clarity

Currently Pending Office Actions

App #TitleStatusAssignee
18458209 LEARNING APPARATUS, METHOD, NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER READABLE MEDIUM AND INFERENCE APPARATUS Final Rejection KABUSHIKI KAISHA TOSHIBA
18172460 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR TIME SERIES FORECASTING VIA ENSEMBLE MACHINE LEARNING Final Rejection Verizon Patent and Licensing Inc.
18295791 NEURAL NETWORK LAYER FOR NON-LINEAR NORMALIZATION Final Rejection Robert Bosch GmbH
17625041 DEVICE AND COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHOD FOR THE PROCESSING OF DIGITAL SENSOR DATA AND TRAINING METHOD THEREFOR Non-Final OA Robert Bosch GmbH
18746109 MACHINE LEARNING APPARATUS, MACHINE LEARNING METHOD, AND COMPUTER READABLE NON-TRANSITORY RECORDING MEDIUM STORING MACHINE LEARNING PROGRAM Non-Final OA JVCKENWOOD Corporation
18285578 FULL-STACK HARDWARE ACCELERATOR SEARCH Non-Final OA Google LLC
16953387 MACHINE LEARNING BASED IMAGING METHOD OF DETERMINING AUTHENTICITY OF A CONSUMER GOOD Final Rejection The Procter & Gamble Company
17129590 NEURAL NETWORK DENSE LAYER SPARSIFICATION AND MATRIX COMPRESSION Final Rejection Intel Corporation
18613095 PROMPT SESSION OPTIMIZATION Non-Final OA INTERNATIONAL BUSINESS MACHINES CORPORATION
17159730 QUANTUM PROCESSOR ARCHITECTURE WITH COMPILER SUPPORT Non-Final OA International Business Machines Corporation
17248845 ASSISTED LEARNING WITH MODULE PRIVACY Final Rejection Regents of the University of Minnesota
18620125 ADVERSARIAL IMITATION LEARNING MODEL Non-Final OA NEC Laboratories America, Inc.
17166965 HYBRID PHYSICS/MACHINE LEARNING MODELING OF PROCESSES Non-Final OA Applied Materials, Inc.
17721372 MACHINE LEARNING DATA GENERATION DEVICE, MACHINE LEARNING DEVICE, AND MACHINE LEARNING DATA GENERATION METHOD Non-Final OA Kabushiki Kaisha Yaskawa Denki
17751089 Automated Selection of Neural Architecture Using a Smoothed Super-Net Final Rejection Arm Limited
17135249 AUTOMATICALLY GENERATING CONDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR RESOLVING PREDICTED SYSTEM ISSUES USING MACHINE LEARNING TECHNIQUES Non-Final OA Dell Products L.P.
18140856 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR QUANTUM SIMULATION WITH ANALOG COMPILATION Final Rejection University of Maryland, College Park

Facing This Examiner?

IP Author analyzes examiner patterns and generates tailored response strategies with the highest chance of allowance.

Build Your Strategy

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month