Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Abm Intellectual Property Inc.

Technology areas: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

9 pending office actions • 4 clients • 9 examiners • 7 art units • 0 of 9 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

ABM Intellectual Property Inc. is a patent law firm that operates in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The firm has managed 171 career applications, resulting in a resolved allowance rate of 83.33 percent. This rate provides an indication of the firm's results in securing patent rights within this specialized field for its clients.

The firm's current workload includes 6 pending office actions. On average, the firm reaches an allowance after 2.35 office actions. This average suggests a prosecution process with the rounds of rejection and response recorded in the data. For practitioners, the 2.35 figure is an indicator of the firm's interactions with examiners in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering.

With 171 career applications, the firm has established its presence in the industry. The 83.33 percent allowance rate, combined with the 2.35 office actions per allowance, highlights a practice that reaches resolutions for its clients. These metrics, along with the 6 pending office actions, offer insights for those evaluating the firm's historical performance and current capacity.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=171 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

83.3%
Allowance Rate
n=171
+0.54σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=171
2.4
OAs to Allowance
n=85
-0.57σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=85
909 days
Time to Allowance
n=85
+16.8pp
Interview Lift
n=171
18.6%
RCE Rate
n=171
0.0%
Appeal Rate
n=171

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

50.0%
§101 Overcome
n=20
78.7%
§102 Overcome
n=47
69.1%
§103 Overcome
n=81
59.6%
§112 Overcome
n=47

Specialization & Scale

A61B, B01L, A43B
Top CPC Subclasses
23%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=171
1
Practitioners
n=171
171.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=171

Portfolio Summary

9
Total Pending OAs
7
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

6
Hard (67%)
2
Medium (22%)
1
Easy (11%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other5 (56%)
§103 only2 (22%)
Double-patenting only1 (11%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (11%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
11% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
2
Semiconductors
22% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
56% of docket
1
Business / Other
11% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

90 h
Manual time on pending OAs
18 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
31 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.8 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ESTRADA, ANGEL R 1 85.5% -43.3%
TRA, ANH QUAN 1 72.9% +5.3%
HALL, SHAUNA-KAY N 1 81.1% +18.5%
JOYNER, KEVIN 1 68.3% +23.6%
GOMES, SRISTI DIVINA 1 25.0% -33.3%
ANDRISH, SEAN D 1 71.5% +32.1%
SHOHATEE, IBRAHIM NAGI 1 71.4% +30.0%
SANGHERA, STEVEN G.S. 1 30.8% +30.4%
KREMER, MATTHEW 1 43.6% +52.2%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18954902 ELECTRICALLY-CONDUCTIVE CORROSION-PROTECTIVE COVERING ESTRADA, ANGEL R —

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18549684 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CREATING A CRYPTOGRAPHICALLY SECURED DIGITAL ASSET HALL, SHAUNA-KAY N 44d overdue
18262246 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DECONTAMINATING A SURFACE USING GERMICIDAL UV LIGHT JOYNER, KEVIN 8d overdue
18188525 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ANALYZING USE OF A WEARABLE DEVICE SANGHERA, STEVEN G.S. 22d
18335493 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR QUANTIFYING AN INJURY RECOVERY STATE GOMES, SRISTI DIVINA —
18316350 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR EVALUATING USER PERFORMANCE ACROSS DIFFERENT ACTIVITIES SHOHATEE, IBRAHIM NAGI —
18046968 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR HETEROGENEOUS EVENT DETECTION KREMER, MATTHEW —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18549684 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CREATING A CRYPTOGRAPHICALLY SECURED DIGITAL ASSET HALL, SHAUNA-KAY N 44d overdue
18262246 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DECONTAMINATING A SURFACE USING GERMICIDAL UV LIGHT JOYNER, KEVIN 8d overdue
18188525 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ANALYZING USE OF A WEARABLE DEVICE SANGHERA, STEVEN G.S. 22d
18331984 METHODS AND ASSEMBLIES FOR ELECTRICALLY GROUNDING AND CORROSION-PROTECTING A METALLIC STRUCTURE ANDRISH, SEAN D —
18316350 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR EVALUATING USER PERFORMANCE ACROSS DIFFERENT ACTIVITIES SHOHATEE, IBRAHIM NAGI —
18046968 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR HETEROGENEOUS EVENT DETECTION KREMER, MATTHEW —

Client Portfolio (4 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37912
28431
37151
17991
36781
28571
36841

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18954902 ELECTRICALLY-CONDUCTIVE CORROSION-PROTECTIVE COVERING Shore Acres Enterprises Inc. (D/B/A Sae Inc.) ESTRADA, ANGEL R DP Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 21, 2024
18922727 WIRELESS CHARGING ASSEMBLIES FOR SENSORIZED INSOLES, METHODS FOR CHARGING SENSORIZED INSOLES, AND FOOTWEAR SYSTEMS INCLUDING SENSORIZED INSOLES Orpyx Medical Technologies Inc. TRA, ANH QUAN 2843 §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 22, 2024
18549684 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CREATING A CRYPTOGRAPHICALLY SECURED DIGITAL ASSET Orpyx Medical Technologies Inc. HALL, SHAUNA-KAY N 3715 §101§112 Non-Final OA 44d overdue Pending Sep 08, 2023
18262246 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR DECONTAMINATING A SURFACE USING GERMICIDAL UV LIGHT U TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION JOYNER, KEVIN 1799 §103§112 Non-Final OA 8d overdue Pending Jul 20, 2023
18335493 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR QUANTIFYING AN INJURY RECOVERY STATE Orpyx Medical Technologies Inc. GOMES, SRISTI DIVINA 3791 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 15, 2023
18331984 METHODS AND ASSEMBLIES FOR ELECTRICALLY GROUNDING AND CORROSION-PROTECTING A METALLIC STRUCTURE Shore Acres Enterprises Inc. ANDRISH, SEAN D 3678 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 09, 2023
18316350 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR EVALUATING USER PERFORMANCE ACROSS DIFFERENT ACTIVITIES Orpyx Medical Technologies Inc. SHOHATEE, IBRAHIM NAGI 2857 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending May 12, 2023
18188525 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR ANALYZING USE OF A WEARABLE DEVICE Orpyx Medical Technologies Inc. SANGHERA, STEVEN G.S. 3684 §101§103 Non-Final OA 22d Pending Mar 23, 2023
18046968 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR HETEROGENEOUS EVENT DETECTION Orpyx Medical Technologies Inc. KREMER, MATTHEW 3791 §101§112 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 17, 2022

Managing Abm Intellectual Property Inc.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month