Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Apple Inc. AT Young Basile

Technology areas: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

11 pending office actions • 1 client • 11 examiners • 7 art units • 1 of 11 (9%) have an AI response strategy ready • 17 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

APPLE INC. at YOUNG BASILE is a high-volume firm in the Communications technology area, with 13050 career applications. This extensive experience provides a deep well of data for evaluating their prosecution performance. The firm is currently handling 8 pending office actions, a focused active workload relative to its historical volume.

The firm maintains a resolved allowance rate pct of 88.68, which is a strong success metric for such a large volume of applications. Prosecution is relatively efficient, with an avg office actions per allowance of 2.82. This indicates that the firm typically secures an allowance in several office actions on average.

The 88.68 resolved allowance rate pct across 13050 career applications underscores the firm's reliability in the Communications sector. The 2.82 avg office actions per allowance suggests a prosecution strategy that balances success with speed. With 8 pending office actions, the firm continues to demonstrate its expertise in navigating the USPTO for communications innovations.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=13050 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

88.7%
Allowance Rate
n=13050
+0.50σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=13050
2.8
OAs to Allowance
n=8859
-0.41σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=8859
878 days
Time to Allowance
n=8859
+6.1pp
Interview Lift
n=13050
20.5%
RCE Rate
n=13050
1.6%
Appeal Rate
n=13050

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

73.5%
§101 Overcome
n=849
80.3%
§102 Overcome
n=3908
80.6%
§103 Overcome
n=5965
82.9%
§112 Overcome
n=3617

Specialization & Scale

G06F, H04N, H04L
Top CPC Subclasses
13%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=13050
12
Practitioners
n=13050
1087.5
Apps / Practitioner
n=13050

Portfolio Summary

11
Total Pending OAs
8
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (45%)
6
Medium (55%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (9%)
§103 only2 (18%)
§102 only4 (36%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (36%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
9% of docket
2
Semiconductors
18% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
36% of docket
4
Business / Other
36% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

110 h
Manual time on pending OAs
22 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
38 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.0 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LAMB, CHRISTOPHER RAY 1 52.3% +9.2%
TEKA, ABIY 1 84.9% +10.2%
RICHMOND, GARTH DANIEL 1 75.0% +24.8%
AUGUSTIN, CHRISTOPHER L 1 78.1% +14.1%
LUBBERS, ANDREW J 1 — —
RICH, JOSEPHINE ELIZABETH 1 82.8% +11.1%
POON, DANA LEE 1 55.4% +41.8%
TA, THO DAC 1 86.4% +15.2%
EMMETT, MADISON B 1 80.2% +10.1%
BURCH, MELODY M 1 64.3% +26.3%

Quick Wins (3)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18851352 Automated Cleaning Of An Optical Element TEKA, ABIY —
18690100 Connector Assembly TA, THO DAC —
18688690 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MOBILE DEVICE MOVEMENT EMMETT, MADISON B —

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18434003 Trim Cover THOMAS, JASMINE JAMES 34d
18889138 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SHARED ELECTRONIC DEVICE OPERATION RICHMOND, GARTH DANIEL —
18611283 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DEVICE POSITIONING RICH, JOSEPHINE ELIZABETH —
18598433 Cleaning System POON, DANA LEE —
18443768 Spring System BURCH, MELODY M —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18851352 Automated Cleaning Of An Optical Element TEKA, ABIY —
18889138 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SHARED ELECTRONIC DEVICE OPERATION RICHMOND, GARTH DANIEL —
18806212 Electrostatic Grounding Structures AUGUSTIN, CHRISTOPHER L —
18611283 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DEVICE POSITIONING RICH, JOSEPHINE ELIZABETH —
18598433 Cleaning System POON, DANA LEE —
18690100 Connector Assembly TA, THO DAC —
18688690 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MOBILE DEVICE MOVEMENT EMMETT, MADISON B —
18443768 Spring System BURCH, MELODY M —

Client Portfolio (1 client)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Apple 11

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
26221
28411
37231
28341
36581
36161
36121

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19197077 Display System Apple Inc. LAMB, CHRISTOPHER RAY 2622 §103 Non-Final OA 15d AI Ready May 02, 2025
18851352 Automated Cleaning Of An Optical Element Apple Inc. TEKA, ABIY §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 26, 2024
18889138 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SHARED ELECTRONIC DEVICE OPERATION Apple Inc. RICHMOND, GARTH DANIEL §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 18, 2024
18806212 Electrostatic Grounding Structures Apple Inc. AUGUSTIN, CHRISTOPHER L 2841 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 15, 2024
18778342 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DEVICE MESSAGING Apple Inc. LUBBERS, ANDREW J §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 19, 2024
18611283 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR DEVICE POSITIONING Apple Inc. RICH, JOSEPHINE ELIZABETH §101§102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 20, 2024
18598433 Cleaning System Apple Inc. POON, DANA LEE 3723 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 07, 2024
18690100 Connector Assembly Apple Inc. TA, THO DAC 2834 §102 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 07, 2024
18688690 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MOBILE DEVICE MOVEMENT Apple Inc. EMMETT, MADISON B 3658 §102 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 01, 2024
18443768 Spring System Apple Inc. BURCH, MELODY M 3616 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 16, 2024
18434003 Trim Cover Apple Inc. THOMAS, JASMINE JAMES 3612 §102§103 Non-Final OA 34d Pending Feb 06, 2024

Managing Apple Inc. AT Young Basile's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month