Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Arentfox Schiff, LLP & Dfci

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

9 pending office actions • 5 clients • 9 examiners • 5 art units • 0 of 9 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 20 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

ArentFox Schiff, LLP & DFCI operates in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area, with 33493 career applications. This massive volume of work demonstrates extensive experience across the patent landscape. The firm is currently managing 8 pending office actions, indicating a focused active workload for this specific partnership.

The firm maintains a resolved allowance rate pct of 88.06, showing a high success rate across its large portfolio. Prosecution typically involves an avg office actions per allowance of 3.27. This average suggests that securing an allowance in Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals often requires several rounds of negotiation with the USPTO.

The 88.06 resolved allowance rate pct across 33493 career applications underscores the firm's reliability as a large-scale prosecution partner. The 3.27 avg office actions per allowance provides a benchmark for clients expecting a thorough prosecution process. With 8 pending office actions, the firm continues to leverage its vast experience to achieve successful outcomes.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=33493 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

88.1%
Allowance Rate
n=33493
+0.53σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=33493
3.3
OAs to Allowance
n=22466
-0.12σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=22466
1016 days
Time to Allowance
n=22466
+7.4pp
Interview Lift
n=33493
28.8%
RCE Rate
n=33493
1.4%
Appeal Rate
n=33493

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

81.1%
§101 Overcome
n=3377
80.2%
§102 Overcome
n=9173
81.0%
§103 Overcome
n=14648
80.7%
§112 Overcome
n=8792

Specialization & Scale

H04L, H04W, G06F
Top CPC Subclasses
17%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=33493
20
Practitioners
n=33493
1674.6
Apps / Practitioner
n=33493

Portfolio Summary

9
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
2
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (2)Due ≤ 60 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (11%)
5
Medium (56%)
2
Easy (22%)
1
Unknown (11%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (11%)
§102 only1 (11%)
§112 only1 (11%)
Double-patenting only1 (11%)
Double-patenting + other3 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (11%)
No statute on record1 (11%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

9
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

90 h
Manual time on pending OAs
18 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
31 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.8 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
GAUGER, PAUL RANDALL 1 56.0% +12.1%
DEKARSKE, MADELINE MCGUIRE 1 0.0% +0.0%
CHICKS, ASHLI ARIANA 1 60.6% +50.3%
ABDALHAMEED, MANAHIL MIRGHANI ALI 1 50.3% +38.2%
TOWNSLEY, SARA ELIZABETH 1 25.5% +49.1%
LEE, CHIHYI NMN 1 33.7% +60.8%
HEITMEIER, KENDALL NICOLE 1 65.9% +41.0%
LADD, CAROLYN LOUISE 1 58.6% +47.1%
YOO, SUN JAE 1 71.1% +0.3%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17801709 POTENT AND SELECTIVE DEGRADERS OF ALK HEITMEIER, KENDALL NICOLE 182d overdue
18031077 PIPERIDINYL SMALL MOLECULE DEGRADERS OF HELIOS AND METHODS OF USE TOWNSLEY, SARA ELIZABETH 13d
18557225 CLASS IIA HISTONE DEACETYLASE (HDAC) DEGRADER LIGANDS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF DEKARSKE, MADELINE MCGUIRE —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17801709 POTENT AND SELECTIVE DEGRADERS OF ALK HEITMEIER, KENDALL NICOLE 182d overdue
18031077 PIPERIDINYL SMALL MOLECULE DEGRADERS OF HELIOS AND METHODS OF USE TOWNSLEY, SARA ELIZABETH 13d
18033872 COMPOUNDS FOR TARGETED PROTEIN DEGRADATION OF KINASES ABDALHAMEED, MANAHIL MIRGHANI ALI 22d
17926074 PIPERIDINE-2,6-DIONES AS SMALL MOLECULE DEGRADERS OF HELIOS AND METHODS OF USE LEE, CHIHYI NMN 34d
18281861 INHIBITORS OF THE PEPTIDYL-PROLYL CIS/TRANS ISOMERASE (PIN1) AND USES THEREOF CHICKS, ASHLI ARIANA 54d
18559655 INHIBITORS AND DEGRADERS OF PIP4K PROTEIN GAUGER, PAUL RANDALL —
17621057 HCK DEGRADERS AND USES THEREOF LADD, CAROLYN LOUISE —

Client Portfolio (5 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
16223
16292
16212
16261
16281

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18559655 INHIBITORS AND DEGRADERS OF PIP4K PROTEIN Cornell University GAUGER, PAUL RANDALL 1629 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 08, 2023
18557225 CLASS IIA HISTONE DEACETYLASE (HDAC) DEGRADER LIGANDS AND METHODS OF USE THEREOF DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE, INC. DEKARSKE, MADELINE MCGUIRE 1622 §103§112DPOther Final Rejection — Pending Oct 25, 2023
18281861 INHIBITORS OF THE PEPTIDYL-PROLYL CIS/TRANS ISOMERASE (PIN1) AND USES THEREOF Yeda Research And Devlopment Co. Ltd. CHICKS, ASHLI ARIANA 1626 §102Other Non-Final OA 54d Pending Sep 13, 2023
18033872 COMPOUNDS FOR TARGETED PROTEIN DEGRADATION OF KINASES Korea Institute Of Science And Technology (Kist) ABDALHAMEED, MANAHIL MIRGHANI ALI 1622 §103 Non-Final OA 22d Pending Apr 26, 2023
18031077 PIPERIDINYL SMALL MOLECULE DEGRADERS OF HELIOS AND METHODS OF USE Neomorph, Inc. TOWNSLEY, SARA ELIZABETH 1629 §112DP Non-Final OA 13d Pending Apr 10, 2023
17926074 PIPERIDINE-2,6-DIONES AS SMALL MOLECULE DEGRADERS OF HELIOS AND METHODS OF USE DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE, INC. LEE, CHIHYI NMN 1628 §112DP Final Rejection 34d Pending Nov 17, 2022
17801709 POTENT AND SELECTIVE DEGRADERS OF ALK DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE, INC. HEITMEIER, KENDALL NICOLE 1621 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 182d overdue Pending Aug 23, 2022
17621057 HCK DEGRADERS AND USES THEREOF DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE, INC. LADD, CAROLYN LOUISE 1622 DP Final Rejection — Pending Dec 20, 2021
17419965 SMALL MOLECULE DEGRADERS OF FKBP12 VIA RECRUITMENT OF VON HIPPEL-LINDAU E3 UBIQUITIN LIGASE (VHL) E3 UBIQUITIN LIGASE, AND USES IN dTAG SYSTEMS DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE, INC. YOO, SUN JAE 1621 — Final Rejection 15d overdue Pending Jun 30, 2021

Managing Arentfox Schiff, LLP & Dfci's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month