Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Bodi Law LLC

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Networking & Security • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

7 pending office actions • 3 clients • 6 examiners • 5 art units • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Bodi Law LLC manages 3 pending office actions in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The firm has a resolved allowance rate of 82.44% based on 217 career applications. An average of 4.94 office actions per allowance reflects the level of examiner interaction required to reach a grant. The 82.44% allowance rate demonstrates a documented track record of success in reaching a grant.

These active matters provide a sample for observing current prosecution trends and examiner behavior. With 217 career applications, the firm has a documented history of navigating mechanical and e-commerce patent law. The average of 4.94 office actions per allowance provides a baseline for the expected intensity of prosecution. The 3 pending office actions represent the firm's current engagement with the patent office and offer a real-time view of their prosecution activity in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems area. This volume of active cases highlights their role in this technical field.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=217 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

82.4%
Allowance Rate
n=217
+0.67σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=217
4.9
OAs to Allowance
n=108
+0.63σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=108
1177 days
Time to Allowance
n=108
+19.2pp
Interview Lift
n=217
34.4%
RCE Rate
n=217
3.6%
Appeal Rate
n=217

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=18 (min 20)
75.0%
§102 Overcome
n=56
75.3%
§103 Overcome
n=97
79.0%
§112 Overcome
n=81

Specialization & Scale

F41H, B32B, E06B
Top CPC Subclasses
14%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=217
0
Practitioners
n=217
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=217 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
2
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due later (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (71%)
2
Medium (29%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (14%)
Double-patenting + other1 (14%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (71%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
14% of docket
1
Information Tech
14% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
43% of docket
2
Business / Other
29% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
BARRERA, JUAN C 2 63.3% +35.0%
MAESTRI, PATRICK J 1 73.4% +14.9%
GLESSNER, BRIAN E 1 35.7% +26.3%
YANG, ZHEREN J 1 57.4% +52.4%
ADAMOS, THEODORE V 1 55.4% +44.6%
SUH, JOSEPH JINWOO 1 78.1% +7.4%

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18099878 Glazed Curtain Wall Panel System ADAMOS, THEODORE V 71d
18934836 Fire Shelter Apparatus and Method BARRERA, JUAN C —
18934869 Bird Collision Prevention Device and Method MAESTRI, PATRICK J —
18104751 Fire Resistant Insulated Glass Structures YANG, ZHEREN J —
16994255 System, Device, and Method of Detecting Dangerous Situations SUH, JOSEPH JINWOO —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18197042 Fire Shelter Apparatus and Method BARRERA, JUAN C 9d overdue
18099878 Glazed Curtain Wall Panel System ADAMOS, THEODORE V 71d
18739250 Antiballistic Window Retrofitting Apparatus and Method GLESSNER, BRIAN E 83d
18934836 Fire Shelter Apparatus and Method BARRERA, JUAN C —
18934869 Bird Collision Prevention Device and Method MAESTRI, PATRICK J —
18104751 Fire Resistant Insulated Glass Structures YANG, ZHEREN J —

Client Portfolio (3 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36331
37521
17811
36351
24851

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18934836 Fire Shelter Apparatus and Method O'Keeffe'S, Inc. BARRERA, JUAN C §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 01, 2024
18934869 Bird Collision Prevention Device and Method O'Keeffe'S, Inc. MAESTRI, PATRICK J §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 01, 2024
18739250 Antiballistic Window Retrofitting Apparatus and Method Disruptive Dealings, LLC GLESSNER, BRIAN E 3633 §103DP Final Rejection 83d Pending Jun 10, 2024
18197042 Fire Shelter Apparatus and Method O'Keeffe'S, Inc. BARRERA, JUAN C 3752 §103 Final Rejection 9d overdue Pending May 13, 2023
18104751 Fire Resistant Insulated Glass Structures O'Keeffe'S, Inc. YANG, ZHEREN J 1781 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 01, 2023
18099878 Glazed Curtain Wall Panel System O'Keeffe'S, Inc. ADAMOS, THEODORE V 3635 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 71d Pending Jan 20, 2023
16994255 System, Device, and Method of Detecting Dangerous Situations Innovation By Imagination LLC SUH, JOSEPH JINWOO 2485 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 14, 2020

Managing Bodi Law LLC's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month