Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Burr & Forman LLP - Fgtl

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

10 pending office actions • 1 client • 9 examiners • 5 art units • 0 of 10 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Burr & Forman LLP - FGTL operates within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The firm has a career applications count of 341, which represents a specialized portfolio. There are 7 pending office actions currently being handled, showing a focused and manageable active workload. This profile highlights a specific segment of the firm's overall patent practice.

The resolved allowance rate pct for this group stands at 45.68, which is a distinct metric for its success in obtaining grants. This rate is achieved with an avg_office_actions_per_allowance of 2.84. This average indicates that when allowances are secured, they often occur with a specific number of interactions. The 45.68 resolved allowance rate pct suggests a challenging prosecution environment for these 341 career applications. These figures provide a detailed look at the firm's performance in this niche, offering insights into the expected pace of patent prosecution based on the 2.84 avg_office_actions_per_allowance.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=341 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

45.7%
Allowance Rate
n=341
-0.16σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=341
2.8
OAs to Allowance
n=74
-0.37σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=74
953 days
Time to Allowance
n=74
-20.1pp
Interview Lift
n=341
43.8%
RCE Rate
n=341
4.0%
Appeal Rate
n=341

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=18 (min 20)
27.9%
§102 Overcome
n=111
21.3%
§103 Overcome
n=202
26.0%
§112 Overcome
n=100

Specialization & Scale

B29C, B62D, B33Y
Top CPC Subclasses
11%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=341
0
Practitioners
n=341
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=341 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

10
Total Pending OAs
3
Non-Final OAs
7
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
2
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

8
Hard (80%)
2
Medium (20%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only2 (20%)
Multi-statute (no §101)8 (80%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
9
Mechanical / Eng
90% of docket
1
Business / Other
10% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

100 h
Manual time on pending OAs
20 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
35 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.9 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SAHNI, VISHAL R 2 75.4% +18.9%
KECK, DANIEL M 1 82.0% +19.7%
BRAUCH, CHARLES JOSEPH 1 81.7% +13.5%
GILBERT, WILLIAM V 1 57.9% +25.8%
BAILEY, JOHN D 1 78.9% +17.2%
MILLER, CAITLIN ANNE 1 89.6% +9.1%
COMINO, EVA L 1 70.4% +32.3%
MORRIS, DAVID R. 1 81.9% +14.3%
BURCH, MELODY M 1 64.3% +26.3%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19040286 WHEEL SLIP CONTROLS AND RESPONSE TO TIRE PRESSURE BRAUCH, CHARLES JOSEPH —

Hard Cases (8)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18538142 BRAKE DUST SHIELD DESIGN FOR BRAKE DUST SHIELD ROBUSTNESS BURCH, MELODY M 29d
18581022 WHEEL COVER RETENTION ASSEMBLY COMINO, EVA L 34d
19052467 ADDITIVE MANUFACTURED SUSPENSION COMPONENTS WITH AN INTEGRATED FLUID PASSAGE KECK, DANIEL M —
18956183 LUG NUT UTILIZING OPEN-FRAME DESIGNS GILBERT, WILLIAM V —
18623398 COMBINED MOTOR ROTOR AND WHEEL RIM ASSEMBLY MILLER, CAITLIN ANNE —
18581761 BRAKE ARCHITECTURE FOR PARKING BRAKE BACKUP RESPONSE SAHNI, VISHAL R —
18423513 ADDITIVELY MANUFACTURED JOUNCE BUMPER WITH DIFFERENT INTERNAL PROPERTIES MORRIS, DAVID R. —
18515573 SPRING ISOLATOR PAD WITH INTEGRATED SPRING ROTATION STOP AND PAD ROTATION STOP SAHNI, VISHAL R —

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18538142 BRAKE DUST SHIELD DESIGN FOR BRAKE DUST SHIELD ROBUSTNESS BURCH, MELODY M 29d
18581022 WHEEL COVER RETENTION ASSEMBLY COMINO, EVA L 34d
18800541 BRAKE ASSIST FOR HOLDING TORQUE WITHIN A BRAKE ASSEMBLY BAILEY, JOHN D 43d
19052467 ADDITIVE MANUFACTURED SUSPENSION COMPONENTS WITH AN INTEGRATED FLUID PASSAGE KECK, DANIEL M —
19040286 WHEEL SLIP CONTROLS AND RESPONSE TO TIRE PRESSURE BRAUCH, CHARLES JOSEPH —
18956183 LUG NUT UTILIZING OPEN-FRAME DESIGNS GILBERT, WILLIAM V —
18581761 BRAKE ARCHITECTURE FOR PARKING BRAKE BACKUP RESPONSE SAHNI, VISHAL R —
18423513 ADDITIVELY MANUFACTURED JOUNCE BUMPER WITH DIFFERENT INTERNAL PROPERTIES MORRIS, DAVID R. —

Client Portfolio (1 client)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Ford 10

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36164
36142
37472
39931
36151

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19052467 ADDITIVE MANUFACTURED SUSPENSION COMPONENTS WITH AN INTEGRATED FLUID PASSAGE Ford Global Technologies, LLC KECK, DANIEL M 3614 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 13, 2025
19040286 WHEEL SLIP CONTROLS AND RESPONSE TO TIRE PRESSURE Ford Global Technologies, LLC BRAUCH, CHARLES JOSEPH 3747 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 29, 2025
18956183 LUG NUT UTILIZING OPEN-FRAME DESIGNS Ford Global Technologies, LLC GILBERT, WILLIAM V 3993 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 22, 2024
18800541 BRAKE ASSIST FOR HOLDING TORQUE WITHIN A BRAKE ASSEMBLY Ford Global Technologies, LLC BAILEY, JOHN D 3747 §103 Final Rejection 43d Pending Aug 12, 2024
18623398 COMBINED MOTOR ROTOR AND WHEEL RIM ASSEMBLY Ford Global Technologies, LLC MILLER, CAITLIN ANNE 3614 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 01, 2024
18581761 BRAKE ARCHITECTURE FOR PARKING BRAKE BACKUP RESPONSE Ford Global Technologies, LLC SAHNI, VISHAL R 3616 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 20, 2024
18581022 WHEEL COVER RETENTION ASSEMBLY Ford Global Technologies, LLC COMINO, EVA L 3615 §102§112 Final Rejection 34d Pending Feb 19, 2024
18423513 ADDITIVELY MANUFACTURED JOUNCE BUMPER WITH DIFFERENT INTERNAL PROPERTIES Ford Global Technologies, LLC MORRIS, DAVID R. 3616 §102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 26, 2024
18538142 BRAKE DUST SHIELD DESIGN FOR BRAKE DUST SHIELD ROBUSTNESS Ford Global Technologies, LLC BURCH, MELODY M 3616 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 29d Pending Dec 13, 2023
18515573 SPRING ISOLATOR PAD WITH INTEGRATED SPRING ROTATION STOP AND PAD ROTATION STOP Ford Global Technologies, LLC SAHNI, VISHAL R 3616 §102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 21, 2023

Managing Burr & Forman LLP - Fgtl's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month