Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics
10 pending office actions • 3 clients • 9 examiners • 8 art units • 0 of 10 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 6 patents granted in the last 365 days
CANTOR COLBURN LLP - FastCAP Systems has 10 pending office actions in Chemistry & Materials. The reported career application record is 74576, with an 88.02% resolved allowance rate and an average of 3.15 office actions per allowance.
The pending-action figure shows current examination work for this profile. The historical figures describe the reported application base, resolved outcomes, and office-action activity associated with allowance. For prosecution planning, this combination can inform docket review and resource expectations while separating current FastCAP Systems matters from the broader historical record.
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 5 (50%) |
| §102 only | 1 (10%) |
| Double-patenting + other | 3 (30%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 1 (10%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| JONES, OLIVIA ANN | 2 | 58.6% | +52.3% |
| GRAY, GEORGE STERLING | 1 | 75.3% | +10.0% |
| FERGUSON, DION | 1 | 86.9% | +8.4% |
| MCCONNELL, WYATT P | 1 | 80.8% | +9.2% |
| LI, AIQUN | 1 | 63.7% | +23.1% |
| GILLIAM, BARBARA LEE | 1 | 24.1% | +13.4% |
| KASS-MULLET, BENJAMIN ELI | 1 | 71.4% | +6.3% |
| TALBOT, BRIAN K | 1 | 59.2% | +30.9% |
| MCFARLAND, DANIEL PATRICK | 1 | 38.1% | -14.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18945893 | CHIP FORM ULTRACAPACITOR | FERGUSON, DION | — |
| 18580319 | ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES | MCCONNELL, WYATT P | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18247849 | MANUFACTURE OF ELECTRODES FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES | GILLIAM, BARBARA LEE | 26d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18247849 | MANUFACTURE OF ELECTRODES FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES | GILLIAM, BARBARA LEE | 26d |
| 18220050 | ELECTRODES FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES | JONES, OLIVIA ANN | 34d |
| 18081057 | ELECTRODES FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES | JONES, OLIVIA ANN | 34d |
| 19451802 | POWER SYSTEM FOR DOWNHOLE TOOLSTRING | GRAY, GEORGE STERLING | — |
| 18481651 | ELECTRODES FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES | LI, AIQUN | — |
| 17986077 | ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES | TALBOT, BRIAN K | — |
| Client (Assignee) | Pending OAs |
|---|---|
| Nanoramic | 5 |
| FASTCAP ULTRACAPACITORS LLC | 3 |
| Fastcap Systems | 2 |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1727 | 2 |
| 1789 | 2 |
| 3676 | 1 |
| 2847 | 1 |
| 1766 | 1 |
| 1752 | 1 |
| 1712 | 1 |
| 2859 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Client | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19451802 | POWER SYSTEM FOR DOWNHOLE TOOLSTRING | Fastcap Ultracapacitors LLC | GRAY, GEORGE STERLING | 3676 | §102§103§112DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 16, 2026 |
| 18945893 | CHIP FORM ULTRACAPACITOR | Fastcap Ultracapacitors LLC | FERGUSON, DION | 2847 | §112DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Nov 13, 2024 |
| 18580319 | ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES | Fastcap Systems Corporation | MCCONNELL, WYATT P | 1727 | §102§103§112DP | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jan 18, 2024 |
| 18481651 | ELECTRODES FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES | Nanoramic, Inc. | LI, AIQUN | 1766 | §102 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Oct 05, 2023 |
| 18220050 | ELECTRODES FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES | Nanoramic, Inc. | JONES, OLIVIA ANN | 1789 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 34d | Pending | Jul 10, 2023 |
| 18247849 | MANUFACTURE OF ELECTRODES FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES | Nanoramic, Inc. | GILLIAM, BARBARA LEE | 1727 | §102§103Other | Non-Final OA | 26d | Pending | Apr 04, 2023 |
| 18081057 | ELECTRODES FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES | Fastcap Systems Corporation | JONES, OLIVIA ANN | 1789 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 34d | Pending | Dec 14, 2022 |
| 18062214 | ELECTRODES FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES | Nanoramic, Inc. | KASS-MULLET, BENJAMIN ELI | 1752 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Dec 06, 2022 |
| 17986077 | ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES | Nanoramic, Inc. | TALBOT, BRIAN K | 1712 | §103Other | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Nov 14, 2022 |
| 17976080 | ADVANCED ELECTROLYTES FOR HIGH TEMERATURE ENERGY STORAGE DEVICE | Fastcap Ultracapacitors LLC | MCFARLAND, DANIEL PATRICK | 2859 | §103 | Final Rejection | 29d overdue | Pending | Oct 28, 2022 |
IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial88.0% of resolved applications prosecuted by Cantor Colburn LLP - Fastcap Systems were allowed, across 74,576 applications in USPTO records.
3.15 office actions per allowed application on average.
10 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 3 clients, before 9 examiners in 8 art units.
