Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Cantor Colburn LLP - Fastcap Systems

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

10 pending office actions • 4 clients • 8 examiners • 7 art units • 0 of 10 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 6 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

CANTOR COLBURN LLP - FastCAP Systems operates in the Chemistry & Materials technology area, utilizing the firm's broad experience of 74190 career applications. This specific designation currently manages 6 pending office actions, representing a focused set of active matters. The firm's history across a wide range of technical fields provides a context for its work in chemical and material science patents.

The firm reports a resolved allowance rate pct of 88.07, indicating success in securing patent rights. This success is achieved with an avg_office_actions_per_allowance of 3.16, suggesting that the firm typically navigates the examination process in a specific number of office actions. The 88.07 resolved allowance rate pct is a key indicator of the firm's effectiveness in the Chemistry & Materials sector. With 74190 career applications, the 3.16 avg_office_actions_per_allowance provides a reliable benchmark for the expected duration of the prosecution cycle. These data points offer a view of the firm's performance and capacity.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=74190 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

88.1%
Allowance Rate
n=74190
+0.55σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=74190
3.2
OAs to Allowance
n=52133
-0.21σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=52133
1018 days
Time to Allowance
n=52133
+3.9pp
Interview Lift
n=74190
25.8%
RCE Rate
n=74190
2.1%
Appeal Rate
n=74190

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

74.8%
§101 Overcome
n=3210
80.4%
§102 Overcome
n=23947
80.7%
§103 Overcome
n=37287
82.0%
§112 Overcome
n=23674

Specialization & Scale

H10K, G02F, G06F
Top CPC Subclasses
10%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=74190
68
Practitioners
n=74190
1091.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=74190

Portfolio Summary

10
Total Pending OAs
9
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
2
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (20%)
8
Medium (80%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (30%)
§102 only2 (20%)
Double-patenting + other3 (30%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (20%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

6
Life Sciences
60% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
2
Semiconductors
20% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
10% of docket
1
Business / Other
10% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

100 h
Manual time on pending OAs
20 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
35 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.9 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
FERGUSON, DION 2 87.0% +8.2%
JONES, OLIVIA ANN 2 58.6% +52.3%
GRAY, GEORGE STERLING 1 75.3% +9.9%
MCCONNELL, WYATT P 1 80.6% +9.4%
LI, AIQUN 1 63.8% +23.1%
WEST, ROBERT GENE 1 74.8% +24.4%
GILLIAM, BARBARA LEE 1 24.1% +13.4%
KASS-MULLET, BENJAMIN ELI 1 70.4% +8.3%

Quick Wins (3)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18029199 ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES FERGUSON, DION 112d overdue
18945893 CHIP FORM ULTRACAPACITOR FERGUSON, DION —
18580319 ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES MCCONNELL, WYATT P —

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18247849 MANUFACTURE OF ELECTRODES FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES GILLIAM, BARBARA LEE 26d
18240545 ELECTRODES FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES WEST, ROBERT GENE —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18247849 MANUFACTURE OF ELECTRODES FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES GILLIAM, BARBARA LEE 26d
18220050 ELECTRODES FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES JONES, OLIVIA ANN 34d
18081057 ELECTRODES FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES JONES, OLIVIA ANN 34d
18481651 ELECTRODES FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES LI, AIQUN —
18240545 ELECTRODES FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES WEST, ROBERT GENE —

Client Portfolio (4 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
28472
17892
36761
17661
17211
17271
17521

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19451802 POWER SYSTEM FOR DOWNHOLE TOOLSTRING Fastcap Ultracapacitors LLC GRAY, GEORGE STERLING 3676 §102§103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 16, 2026
18945893 CHIP FORM ULTRACAPACITOR Fastcap Ultracapacitors LLC FERGUSON, DION 2847 §112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 13, 2024
18580319 ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES Fastcap Systems Corporation MCCONNELL, WYATT P §102§103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 18, 2024
18481651 ELECTRODES FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES Nanoramic, Inc. LI, AIQUN 1766 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 05, 2023
18240545 ELECTRODES FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES Fastcap Ultracapacitors LLC WEST, ROBERT GENE 1721 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 31, 2023
18220050 ELECTRODES FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES Nanoramic, Inc. JONES, OLIVIA ANN 1789 §103 Non-Final OA 34d Pending Jul 10, 2023
18247849 MANUFACTURE OF ELECTRODES FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES Nanoramic, Inc. GILLIAM, BARBARA LEE 1727 §102§103Other Non-Final OA 26d Pending Apr 04, 2023
18029199 ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES Nanoramic, Inc. FERGUSON, DION 2847 §102Other Non-Final OA 112d overdue Pending Mar 29, 2023
18081057 ELECTRODES FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES Fastcap Systems Corporation JONES, OLIVIA ANN 1789 §103 Non-Final OA 34d Pending Dec 14, 2022
18062214 ELECTRODES FOR ENERGY STORAGE DEVICES Nanoramic, Inc. KASS-MULLET, BENJAMIN ELI 1752 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 06, 2022

Managing Cantor Colburn LLP - Fastcap Systems's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month