Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Caseiro Burke LLC

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

5 pending office actions • 4 clients • 5 examiners • 3 art units • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Caseiro Burke LLC has handled 340 career applications in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The firm currently manages 2 pending office actions. Its resolved allowance rate is 77.19 percent, reflecting the proportion of cases that successfully reach allowance. The firm averages 2.93 office actions per allowance, which provides a measure of the typical prosecution effort required.

The 2.93 average office actions per allowance, paired with the 77.19 percent allowance rate, demonstrates the firm's consistent performance across 340 career applications. The 2 pending office actions indicate the firm's current active workload in this sector. These metrics allow practitioners to evaluate the firm's efficiency and its historical success rate in obtaining patents.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=340 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

77.2%
Allowance Rate
n=340
+0.41σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=340
2.9
OAs to Allowance
n=176
-0.36σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=176
1000 days
Time to Allowance
n=176
+6.6pp
Interview Lift
n=340
12.7%
RCE Rate
n=340
1.6%
Appeal Rate
n=340

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

60.0%
§101 Overcome
n=20
60.0%
§102 Overcome
n=95
69.5%
§103 Overcome
n=154
65.7%
§112 Overcome
n=105

Specialization & Scale

G01N, A61B, Y10T
Top CPC Subclasses
15%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=340
2
Practitioners
n=340
170.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=340

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (80%)
1
Medium (20%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (20%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (80%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
40% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
20% of docket
2
Business / Other
40% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MINTZ, RODNEY K 1 79.0% +10.7%
VERA, ELISA H 1 72.2% +26.5%
PATEL, PRANAV N 1 68.7% +21.7%
CASE, SARAH CATHERINE 1 41.1% +50.8%
HULL, JAMES B 1 45.4% +52.4%

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19097542 RESTRAINED JOINT APPARATUS, USES OF, AND METHODS FOR MAKING, THE SAME MINTZ, RODNEY K —
18896831 CELLULOSE-BASED INSULATION AND METHODS OF MAKING THE SAME VERA, ELISA H —
18600619 KINETIC FILTRATION DEVICE PATEL, PRANAV N —
18290202 HYBRID FIRE RETARDANT INSULATION AND METHOD OF MAKING THE SAME CASE, SARAH CATHERINE —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18547463 ANATOMICAL HEAD AND NECK SIMULATOR APPARATUS HULL, JAMES B 28d overdue
19097542 RESTRAINED JOINT APPARATUS, USES OF, AND METHODS FOR MAKING, THE SAME MINTZ, RODNEY K —
18896831 CELLULOSE-BASED INSULATION AND METHODS OF MAKING THE SAME VERA, ELISA H —
18600619 KINETIC FILTRATION DEVICE PATEL, PRANAV N —
18290202 HYBRID FIRE RETARDANT INSULATION AND METHOD OF MAKING THE SAME CASE, SARAH CATHERINE —

Client Portfolio (4 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
CLEANFIBER INC. 2
Norman L. Olson 1
Bastion Law, LLC 1
HALO MED LLC 1

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
17771
17481
37151

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19097542 RESTRAINED JOINT APPARATUS, USES OF, AND METHODS FOR MAKING, THE SAME Norman L. Olson MINTZ, RODNEY K §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 01, 2025
18896831 CELLULOSE-BASED INSULATION AND METHODS OF MAKING THE SAME Cleanfiber Inc. VERA, ELISA H §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 25, 2024
18600619 KINETIC FILTRATION DEVICE Bastion Law, LLC PATEL, PRANAV N 1777 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 08, 2024
18290202 HYBRID FIRE RETARDANT INSULATION AND METHOD OF MAKING THE SAME Cleanfiber Inc. CASE, SARAH CATHERINE 1748 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 10, 2023
18547463 ANATOMICAL HEAD AND NECK SIMULATOR APPARATUS Halo Med LLC HULL, JAMES B 3715 §103 Final Rejection 28d overdue Pending Aug 22, 2023

Managing Caseiro Burke LLC's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month