Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Endurance Law Group, PLC

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

11 pending office actions • 9 clients • 11 examiners • 9 art units • 0 of 11 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Endurance Law Group, PLC operates as a patent law firm with a focus on Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering. The firm has managed 773 career applications, indicating a specialized practice in this technical field. It maintains a resolved allowance rate of 88.32 percent, demonstrating a solid track record of successful patent acquisitions. This performance metric is a key indicator of its effectiveness in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering sector. The firm's prosecution history provides a clear data set for prospective clients.

The firm currently handles 10 pending office actions. Its average of 2.42 office actions per allowance reflects the typical level of engagement required with patent examiners. This figure, combined with the 88.32 percent allowance rate, provides a clear picture of the firm's prosecution strategy. Practitioners can use the 773 career applications and the 2.42 average office actions per allowance to evaluate the firm's operational results and prosecution intensity. These statistics offer a transparent view of the firm's work in its primary technology area.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=773 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

88.3%
Allowance Rate
n=773
+0.55σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=773
2.4
OAs to Allowance
n=499
-0.51σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=499
883 days
Time to Allowance
n=499
+8.8pp
Interview Lift
n=773
14.0%
RCE Rate
n=773
3.5%
Appeal Rate
n=773

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

72.1%
§101 Overcome
n=43
77.4%
§102 Overcome
n=181
81.5%
§103 Overcome
n=298
81.3%
§112 Overcome
n=257

Specialization & Scale

A61B, F04C, Y02E
Top CPC Subclasses
9%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=773
0
Practitioners
n=773
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=773 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

11
Total Pending OAs
9
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

6
Hard (55%)
4
Medium (36%)
1
Easy (9%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (9%)
§103 only3 (27%)
§102 only1 (9%)
§112 only1 (9%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (45%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
9% of docket
9
Mechanical / Eng
82% of docket
1
Business / Other
9% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

110 h
Manual time on pending OAs
22 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
38 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.0 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WU, PAMELA F 1 57.3% +22.2%
ADAMOS, THEODORE V 1 55.4% +44.6%
SANTOS, KIRSTEN JADE M 1 52.8% +35.2%
AYUB, HINA F 1 84.9% +17.4%
SADATE-MOUALEU, MIREILLE SANDRA 1 91.3% +10.5%
NGUYEN, HIEN NGOC 1 52.6% +40.6%
EBERSMAN, BRUCE I 1 64.1% +58.6%
HERRMANN, JOSEPH S 1 63.7% +40.4%
KASTURE, DNYANESH G 1 48.1% +26.5%
GRANT, MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER 1 21.8% +7.4%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18834356 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONFOCAL-CHROMATIC LINE DISTANCE MEASUREMENT AYUB, HINA F 76d

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18147913 ASSEMBLY AND ELECTRIC COMPRESSOR WITH NON-RADIAL CLAMPING FEATURE HERRMANN, JOSEPH S 89d overdue
19079181 SURGICAL ACCESS DEVICE HAVING ONBOARD BALLOON VISUALIZATION MODULE WU, PAMELA F 73d overdue
18913455 BACKER ROD FOR METAL ROOFS AND SIDING ADAMOS, THEODORE V —
18897461 AUTONOMOUS FARMING DEVICES, SYSTEMS AND METHODS SANTOS, KIRSTEN JADE M —
18721845 A DYNAMIC WEIGHING SYSTEM OF A VEHICLE SADATE-MOUALEU, MIREILLE SANDRA —
17887155 SYSTEM, METHOD, AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIA FOR PROVIDING CLASS II ROULETTE GAME GRANT, MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER —

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18247332 METHOD, DEVICE AND SYSTEM FOR INTERACTION WITH THIRD PARTIES EBERSMAN, BRUCE I 97d overdue
18147913 ASSEMBLY AND ELECTRIC COMPRESSOR WITH NON-RADIAL CLAMPING FEATURE HERRMANN, JOSEPH S 89d overdue
19079181 SURGICAL ACCESS DEVICE HAVING ONBOARD BALLOON VISUALIZATION MODULE WU, PAMELA F 73d overdue
18403831 SONOTRODE NGUYEN, HIEN NGOC 14d
18834356 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONFOCAL-CHROMATIC LINE DISTANCE MEASUREMENT AYUB, HINA F 76d
18913455 BACKER ROD FOR METAL ROOFS AND SIDING ADAMOS, THEODORE V —
18897461 AUTONOMOUS FARMING DEVICES, SYSTEMS AND METHODS SANTOS, KIRSTEN JADE M —
18721845 A DYNAMIC WEIGHING SYSTEM OF A VEHICLE SADATE-MOUALEU, MIREILLE SANDRA —

Client Portfolio (9 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37462
37951
36351
36641
28771
37971
36931
37151
37911

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19079181 SURGICAL ACCESS DEVICE HAVING ONBOARD BALLOON VISUALIZATION MODULE Cardiosight, Inc. WU, PAMELA F 3795 §103§112 Non-Final OA 73d overdue Pending Mar 13, 2025
18913455 BACKER ROD FOR METAL ROOFS AND SIDING Oil Can Rod, LLC ADAMOS, THEODORE V 3635 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 11, 2024
18897461 AUTONOMOUS FARMING DEVICES, SYSTEMS AND METHODS Mti Technologies Pty Limited SANTOS, KIRSTEN JADE M 3664 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 26, 2024
18834356 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR CONFOCAL-CHROMATIC LINE DISTANCE MEASUREMENT MICRO-EPSILON OPTRONIC GMBH AYUB, HINA F 2877 §103 Non-Final OA 76d Pending Jul 30, 2024
18721845 A DYNAMIC WEIGHING SYSTEM OF A VEHICLE Roberto Impero SADATE-MOUALEU, MIREILLE SANDRA §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 19, 2024
18403831 SONOTRODE Alma Lasers Ltd. NGUYEN, HIEN NGOC 3797 §103 Non-Final OA 14d Pending Jan 04, 2024
18247332 METHOD, DEVICE AND SYSTEM FOR INTERACTION WITH THIRD PARTIES Moßler GmbH EBERSMAN, BRUCE I 3693 §102 Non-Final OA 97d overdue Pending Mar 30, 2023
18147913 ASSEMBLY AND ELECTRIC COMPRESSOR WITH NON-RADIAL CLAMPING FEATURE Mahle International GmbH HERRMANN, JOSEPH S 3746 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 89d overdue Pending Dec 29, 2022
17944004 ELECTRIC COMPRESSOR WITH DOMED INVERTER COVER Mahle International GmbH KASTURE, DNYANESH G 3746 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 13, 2022
17887155 SYSTEM, METHOD, AND COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIA FOR PROVIDING CLASS II ROULETTE GAME Ags LLC GRANT, MICHAEL CHRISTOPHER 3715 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 12, 2022
16789250 MECHANICALLY LOCKING ADJUSTABLE CARDIAC TETHER Cardiosight, Inc. MATTHEWS, CHRISTINE HOPKINS 3791 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 12, 2020

Managing Endurance Law Group, PLC's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month