Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Espatent OY

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

19 pending office actions • 9 clients • 19 examiners • 17 art units • 0 of 19 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 18 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Espatent Oy handles matters in Chemistry & Materials and records 170 career applications. Its profile includes 18 pending office actions, showing active prosecution alongside a defined application history.

The resolved allowance rate is 71.64%, and the average office actions per allowance is 4.46. The outcome measure indicates that resolved matters have reached allowance at a lower rate than profiles with higher reported rates, while the action average reflects substantial examination activity before allowance.

For practitioners, these figures make prosecution planning particularly relevant. Chemistry and materials claims may require sustained work on distinctions, support, and claim scope. The profile provides both an outcome measure and an effort measure, allowing applicants to consider not only whether matters are allowed, but also how much office-action interaction may accompany that result.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=170 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

71.6%
Allowance Rate
n=170
+0.25σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=170
4.5
OAs to Allowance
n=48
+0.26σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=48
1077 days
Time to Allowance
n=48
+11.9pp
Interview Lift
n=170
46.3%
RCE Rate
n=170
2.0%
Appeal Rate
n=170

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=19 (min 20)
48.1%
§102 Overcome
n=52
47.2%
§103 Overcome
n=72
47.8%
§112 Overcome
n=69

Specialization & Scale

C23C, H10P, H04W
Top CPC Subclasses
17%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=170
1
Practitioners
n=170
170.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=170

Portfolio Summary

19
Total Pending OAs
12
Non-Final OAs
6
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 30 days (2)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

12
Hard (63%)
6
Medium (32%)
1
Easy (5%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (5%)
§101 + other5 (26%)
§103 only4 (21%)
§102 only2 (11%)
§112 only1 (5%)
Multi-statute (no §101)6 (32%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

9
Life Sciences
47% of docket
3
Information Tech
16% of docket
1
Communications
5% of docket
2
Semiconductors
11% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
16% of docket
1
Business / Other
5% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

190 h
Manual time on pending OAs
38 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
66 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MINSKEY, JACOB T 1 69.2% +33.1%
VERA, ELISA H 1 72.4% +26.3%
MARSH, OWEN LEWIS 1 66.7% +50.0%
JARRETT, RYAN A 1 80.9% +7.2%
MOUTAOUAKIL, MOUNIR 1 81.1% +16.6%
CARRILLO, BIBI SHARIDAN 1 62.5% -15.3%
BREWSTER, HAYDEN R 1 62.8% +46.8%
DINH, JOSEPH NGHIA 1 100.0% +0.0%
GURTOWSKI, RICHARD C 1 72.3% +37.8%
JACKSON, JORDAN L 1 40.4% +39.0%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18863357 Management of a distributed energy storage, DES, arrangement JARRETT, RYAN A —

Hard Cases (12)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17442704 CRANE ANTI-COLLISION SYSTEM, METHOD, PROGRAM, AND MANUFACTURING METHOD PETTIEGREW, TOYA R 155d overdue
18476382 Personalized curriculum MCATEE, PATRICK 23d overdue
18695977 A method for defining neighbor relations in a communication network DINH, JOSEPH NGHIA 30d
18875193 Biocide control in paper making MINSKEY, JACOB T —
18874116 Method for controlling a process in making pulp, paper, or board VERA, ELISA H —
18976395 SENSOR GEOMETRY FOR A WEARABLE DEVICE MARSH, OWEN LEWIS —
18862188 Controlling a communications network MOUTAOUAKIL, MOUNIR —
18721670 A METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MONITORING BIOSLUDGE QUALITY IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT BREWSTER, HAYDEN R —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18875193 Biocide control in paper making MINSKEY, JACOB T —
18874116 Method for controlling a process in making pulp, paper, or board VERA, ELISA H —
18976395 SENSOR GEOMETRY FOR A WEARABLE DEVICE MARSH, OWEN LEWIS —
18862188 Controlling a communications network MOUTAOUAKIL, MOUNIR —
18721670 A METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MONITORING BIOSLUDGE QUALITY IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT BREWSTER, HAYDEN R —
18695041 A METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CONTROLLING A COAGULANT DOSAGE IN A WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM GURTOWSKI, RICHARD C —
18565090 ANALYZING MEASUREMENT RESULTS OF A COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK OR OTHER TARGET SYSTEM JACKSON, JORDAN L —

Client Portfolio (9 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
17482
37961
21161
24761
17111
26411
17731
28571
16531
16451

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18875193 Biocide control in paper making Kemira Oyj MINSKEY, JACOB T 1748 §101§102§103§112DP Final Rejection — Pending Dec 16, 2024
18874116 Method for controlling a process in making pulp, paper, or board Kemira Oyj VERA, ELISA H 1748 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 12, 2024
18976395 SENSOR GEOMETRY FOR A WEARABLE DEVICE Oura Health OY MARSH, OWEN LEWIS 3796 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 11, 2024
18863357 Management of a distributed energy storage, DES, arrangement Elisa Oyj JARRETT, RYAN A 2116 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 06, 2024
18862188 Controlling a communications network Elisa Oyj MOUTAOUAKIL, MOUNIR 2476 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 01, 2024
18824950 Method and apparatus for cleaning a reaction chamber Picosun OY CARRILLO, BIBI SHARIDAN 1711 §103 Final Rejection 55d Pending Sep 05, 2024
18721670 A METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MONITORING BIOSLUDGE QUALITY IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT Kemira Oyj BREWSTER, HAYDEN R §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 19, 2024
18695977 A method for defining neighbor relations in a communication network Elisa Oyj DINH, JOSEPH NGHIA 2641 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA 30d Pending Mar 27, 2024
18695041 A METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR CONTROLLING A COAGULANT DOSAGE IN A WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM Kemira Oyj GURTOWSKI, RICHARD C 1773 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 25, 2024
18565090 ANALYZING MEASUREMENT RESULTS OF A COMMUNICATIONS NETWORK OR OTHER TARGET SYSTEM Elisa Oyj JACKSON, JORDAN L 2857 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 29, 2023
18553904 METHOD FOR PRODUCING CELL GROWTH MEDIUM Solar Foods Oyj NGUYEN, NGHI V 1653 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 04, 2023
18553946 VARIANT BACTERIAL STRAINS AND PROCESSES FOR PROTEIN OR BIOMASS PRODUCTION Solar Foods Oyj GRASER, JENNIFER E 1645 §112 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 04, 2023
18476382 Personalized curriculum Yousician OY MCATEE, PATRICK 3698 §101 Non-Final OA 23d overdue Pending Sep 28, 2023
18551904 METHODS OF PRODUCING MEAT ANALOGUE FOOD INGREDIENTS Solar Foods Oyj DIVIESTI, KARLA ISOBEL 1792 §103 Non-Final OA 1d overdue Pending Sep 22, 2023
18550850 METHODS OF ADDING FEED MEDIUM INTO BIOPROCESS Solar Foods Oyj HERNANDEZ, RITCHIE EVAN 1799 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 15, 2023
18461570 SERVICE DEPLOYMENT CONTROL OY Idlis AB TABOR, AMARE F 2434 §103 Non-Final OA 14d Pending Sep 06, 2023
18002391 MEMS RESONATOR AND MANUFACTURING METHOD Kyocera Technologies OY MATA, SARA M 2837 §102 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 19, 2022
17791075 SUBSTRATE PROCESSING APPARATUS AND METHOD Picosun OY SWEELY, KURT D 1718 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 06, 2022
17442704 CRANE ANTI-COLLISION SYSTEM, METHOD, PROGRAM, AND MANUFACTURING METHOD Konecranes Global OY PETTIEGREW, TOYA R 3662 §101§103 Non-Final OA 155d overdue Pending Sep 24, 2021

Managing Espatent OY's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Espatent OY's patent allowance rate?

71.6% of resolved applications prosecuted by Espatent OY were allowed, across 170 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Espatent OY average before allowance?

4.46 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Espatent OY have?

19 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 9 clients, before 19 examiners in 17 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month