8 pending office actions • 5 clients • 8 examiners • 6 art units • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §101 + other | 1 (12%) |
| §103 only | 3 (38%) |
| §102 only | 1 (12%) |
| §112 only | 1 (12%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (25%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| WENDMAGEGN, GIRUMSEW | 1 | 76.9% | +21.2% |
| KASENGE, CHARLES R | 1 | 84.3% | +13.4% |
| CARLSON, JEFFREY D | 1 | 28.9% | +22.0% |
| MEJIAS, SAMANTHA LEE | 1 | 50.0% | +60.0% |
| SCHLIENTZ, LEAH H | 1 | 41.9% | +38.5% |
| CHAWLA, JYOTI | 1 | 52.5% | +30.2% |
| YOUNG, BRIAN ELLIS | 1 | 65.7% | +30.1% |
| GIRI, PURSOTTAM | 1 | 19.0% | +12.6% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18889354 | SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND APPARATUSES FOR ADAPTIVE IRRIGATION ZONE CONTROL USING PRESSURE, TIME, FLOW, AND PREDICTED BEHAVIOR | KASENGE, CHARLES R | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17114433 | PREDICTING AND PREVENTING HYPOGLYCEMIA IN PATIENTS HAVING TYPE 1 DIABETES DURING PERIODS OF INCOGNIZANCE USING BIG DATA ANALYTICS AND DECISION THEORETIC ANALYSIS | GIRI, PURSOTTAM | 14d |
| 18216361 | Two-Wheeled, Self-Balancing Vehicle with Independently Movable Foot Platform Sections | CARLSON, JEFFREY D | — |
| 18042209 | SMALL MOLECULE ALBUMIN BINDERS | SCHLIENTZ, LEAH H | — |
| 17753592 | CRISPR-MEDIATED CAPTURE OF NUCLEIC ACIDS | YOUNG, BRIAN ELLIS | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17114433 | PREDICTING AND PREVENTING HYPOGLYCEMIA IN PATIENTS HAVING TYPE 1 DIABETES DURING PERIODS OF INCOGNIZANCE USING BIG DATA ANALYTICS AND DECISION THEORETIC ANALYSIS | GIRI, PURSOTTAM | 14d |
| 18145831 | PRODUCTION OF LEGUME-BASED NUTRIENT-DENSE DOUGHS AND FOOD PRODUCTS | CHAWLA, JYOTI | 27d |
| 18044444 | STABILIZED HYDROPHOBIC NANOPARTICLES FOR ULTRASOUND IMAGING | MEJIAS, SAMANTHA LEE | 42d |
| 19037185 | WORKSTATION SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATED INSPECTION OF ROBOTICALLY OR MANUALLY PERFORMED DEXTEROUS TASKS | WENDMAGEGN, GIRUMSEW | 84d |
| 18889354 | SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND APPARATUSES FOR ADAPTIVE IRRIGATION ZONE CONTROL USING PRESSURE, TIME, FLOW, AND PREDICTED BEHAVIOR | KASENGE, CHARLES R | — |
| 18216361 | Two-Wheeled, Self-Balancing Vehicle with Independently Movable Foot Platform Sections | CARLSON, JEFFREY D | — |
| 18042209 | SMALL MOLECULE ALBUMIN BINDERS | SCHLIENTZ, LEAH H | — |
| 17753592 | CRISPR-MEDIATED CAPTURE OF NUCLEIC ACIDS | YOUNG, BRIAN ELLIS | — |
| Client (Assignee) | Pending OAs |
|---|---|
| OHSU | 4 |
| Rapta Inc. | 1 |
| Hydropoint Data Systems, Inc. | 1 |
| Shane Chen | 1 |
| Antithesis Foods Inc. | 1 |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1618 | 2 |
| 2484 | 1 |
| 3992 | 1 |
| 1791 | 1 |
| 1684 | 1 |
| 2186 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Client | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19037185 | WORKSTATION SYSTEM FOR AUTOMATED INSPECTION OF ROBOTICALLY OR MANUALLY PERFORMED DEXTEROUS TASKS | Rapta Inc. | WENDMAGEGN, GIRUMSEW | 2484 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 84d | Pending | Jan 25, 2025 |
| 18889354 | SYSTEMS, METHODS, AND APPARATUSES FOR ADAPTIVE IRRIGATION ZONE CONTROL USING PRESSURE, TIME, FLOW, AND PREDICTED BEHAVIOR | Hydropoint Data Systems, Inc. | KASENGE, CHARLES R | §102 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Sep 18, 2024 | |
| 18216361 | Two-Wheeled, Self-Balancing Vehicle with Independently Movable Foot Platform Sections | Shane Chen | CARLSON, JEFFREY D | 3992 | §112Other | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jun 29, 2023 |
| 18044444 | STABILIZED HYDROPHOBIC NANOPARTICLES FOR ULTRASOUND IMAGING | Oregon Health & Science University | MEJIAS, SAMANTHA LEE | 1618 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 42d | Pending | Mar 08, 2023 |
| 18042209 | SMALL MOLECULE ALBUMIN BINDERS | Oregon Health & Science University | SCHLIENTZ, LEAH H | 1618 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Feb 17, 2023 |
| 18145831 | PRODUCTION OF LEGUME-BASED NUTRIENT-DENSE DOUGHS AND FOOD PRODUCTS | Antithesis Foods Inc. | CHAWLA, JYOTI | 1791 | §103 | Final Rejection | 27d | Pending | Dec 22, 2022 |
| 17753592 | CRISPR-MEDIATED CAPTURE OF NUCLEIC ACIDS | Oregon Health & Science University | YOUNG, BRIAN ELLIS | 1684 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Mar 08, 2022 |
| 17114433 | PREDICTING AND PREVENTING HYPOGLYCEMIA IN PATIENTS HAVING TYPE 1 DIABETES DURING PERIODS OF INCOGNIZANCE USING BIG DATA ANALYTICS AND DECISION THEORETIC ANALYSIS | Oregon Health & Science University | GIRI, PURSOTTAM | 2186 | §101§102§103 | Non-Final OA | 14d | Pending | Dec 07, 2020 |
IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial