Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Global Ip Services, Pllc

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Networking & Security • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

8 pending office actions • 8 clients • 8 examiners • 4 art units • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 1 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

GLOBAL IP SERVICES, PLLC focuses its practice in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. The firm has a career total of 1357 applications, which provides a foundation for evaluating their performance. Currently, the firm is managing 5 pending office actions, indicating a focused and active docket of current matters.

The firm has a resolved allowance rate of 95.61 percent. This success is achieved with a low average of 1.62 office actions per allowance. This 1.62 average indicates an efficient prosecution process, where patents are granted after few rounds of interaction with the patent office. The 95.61 percent allowance rate across 1357 career applications is a strong indicator of the firm's effectiveness in the Chemistry & Materials sector.

With 5 pending office actions and 1357 career applications, the firm has a history of success. The 95.61 percent resolved allowance rate serves as a primary benchmark for their performance. Practitioners can look at the 1.62 average office actions per allowance to understand the firm's typical speed and efficiency in reaching an allowance for their clients.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1357 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

95.6%
Allowance Rate
n=1357
+0.37σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1357
1.6
OAs to Allowance
n=1241
-1.32σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=1241
869 days
Time to Allowance
n=1241
-2.9pp
Interview Lift
n=1357
8.1%
RCE Rate
n=1357
2.5%
Appeal Rate
n=1357

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

89.9%
§101 Overcome
n=109
81.4%
§102 Overcome
n=188
85.7%
§103 Overcome
n=329
92.5%
§112 Overcome
n=466

Specialization & Scale

G06F, H04L, H04N
Top CPC Subclasses
20%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1357
1
Practitioners
n=1357
1357.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=1357

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 30 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (50%)
3
Medium (38%)
1
Easy (12%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (12%)
§101 + other1 (12%)
§103 only2 (25%)
§102 only1 (12%)
§112 only1 (12%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
25% of docket
1
Information Tech
12% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
12% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
4
Business / Other
50% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
STEPHENS, MATTHEW 1 65.5% +22.6%
BLANCHETTE, JOSHUA B 1 47.8% +31.8%
MENSH, ANDREW J 1 64.3% +19.2%
WAGGONER, TIMOTHY R 1 71.6% +7.7%
BARBEE, MANUEL L 1 81.7% +13.9%
WEYDEMEYER, ALICIA JANE 1 46.2% +27.7%
TELAN, MICHAEL R 1 42.8% +27.0%
PIRO, NICHOLAS ANTHONY 1 45.9% +35.9%

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18270504 HIGH-PRECISION VEHICLE VELOCITY CALCULATION METHOD BARBEE, MANUEL L 147d overdue
18105823 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR EXTRACTION OF IRON VALUES FROM RED MUD PIRO, NICHOLAS ANTHONY 88d overdue
18210007 CHECKERED COMPOSITE PLATE AND PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGY THEREOF WEYDEMEYER, ALICIA JANE 22d
19017986 AGENTIC GPT-BASED INTERACTIVE ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS BLANCHETTE, JOSHUA B —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18270504 HIGH-PRECISION VEHICLE VELOCITY CALCULATION METHOD BARBEE, MANUEL L 147d overdue
18105823 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR EXTRACTION OF IRON VALUES FROM RED MUD PIRO, NICHOLAS ANTHONY 88d overdue
18130459 USER-CHOSEN, OBJECT GUIDED REGION OF INTEREST (ROI) ENABLED DIGITAL VIDEO TELAN, MICHAEL R 1d overdue
18210007 CHECKERED COMPOSITE PLATE AND PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGY THEREOF WEYDEMEYER, ALICIA JANE 22d
19073240 GRINDING DEVICE STEPHENS, MATTHEW —
19017986 AGENTIC GPT-BASED INTERACTIVE ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS BLANCHETTE, JOSHUA B —
18871824 NON-WOVEN FABRIC HAVING STRIPE PROTRUSIONS ON SURFACE, AND ABSORPTION PRODUCT THEREOF MENSH, ANDREW J —

Client Portfolio (8 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
28571
17811
24261
17381

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19073240 GRINDING DEVICE Ningbo Chefshere Kitchen Technology Co., Ltd. STEPHENS, MATTHEW §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 07, 2025
19017986 AGENTIC GPT-BASED INTERACTIVE ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS Cardiaccloud AI, Inc. BLANCHETTE, JOSHUA B §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 13, 2025
18871824 NON-WOVEN FABRIC HAVING STRIPE PROTRUSIONS ON SURFACE, AND ABSORPTION PRODUCT THEREOF Xiamen Yanjan New Material Co., Ltd. MENSH, ANDREW J §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 05, 2024
18721202 CONTROL SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GUIDING CLASSIFIED STORAGE AND FEEDING/DISCHARGING TAKEOUT AND PLACEMENT OF LOCK PINS Shanghai Zhenhua Heavy Industries Co., Ltd. WAGGONER, TIMOTHY R §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 18, 2024
18270504 HIGH-PRECISION VEHICLE VELOCITY CALCULATION METHOD Huizhou Desay Sv Automotive Co., Ltd. BARBEE, MANUEL L 2857 §101 Non-Final OA 147d overdue Pending Jun 30, 2023
18210007 CHECKERED COMPOSITE PLATE AND PRODUCTION TECHNOLOGY THEREOF Ningbo Golden Elephant Kitchenware Co., Ltd. WEYDEMEYER, ALICIA JANE 1781 §102§103§112 Final Rejection 22d Pending Jun 14, 2023
18130459 USER-CHOSEN, OBJECT GUIDED REGION OF INTEREST (ROI) ENABLED DIGITAL VIDEO Ittiam Systems (P) Ltd. TELAN, MICHAEL R 2426 §103 Final Rejection 1d overdue Pending Apr 04, 2023
18105823 METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR EXTRACTION OF IRON VALUES FROM RED MUD Eesavyasa Technologies Pvt Ltd. PIRO, NICHOLAS ANTHONY 1738 §103§112 Final Rejection 88d overdue Pending Feb 04, 2023

Managing Global Ip Services, Pllc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month