Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Grell & Watson Patent Attorneys LLC

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

6 pending office actions • 5 clients • 6 examiners • 4 art units • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Grell & Watson Patent Attorneys LLC operates in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The firm has handled 886 career applications, which provides data on their prosecution history. Currently, the firm is managing 6 pending office actions, indicating a steady current docket of active matters.

The firm maintains a resolved allowance rate of 88.62 percent. This success is achieved with an average of 2.45 office actions per allowance. This 2.45 average indicates a prosecution process typically requiring multiple rounds of interaction with examiners to reach a grant in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems field. The 88.62 percent allowance rate across 886 career applications demonstrates a track record of securing patent rights.

With 6 pending office actions, the firm continues to prosecute new matters for its clients. The 886 career applications establish a basis for evaluating their performance. Practitioners can use the 88.62 percent resolved allowance rate and the 2.45 average office actions per allowance as key metrics for the firm's efficiency and effectiveness in their primary technology area.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=886 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

88.6%
Allowance Rate
n=886
+0.61σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=886
2.4
OAs to Allowance
n=522
-0.51σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=522
888 days
Time to Allowance
n=522
+4.7pp
Interview Lift
n=886
12.2%
RCE Rate
n=886
0.0%
Appeal Rate
n=886

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

75.0%
§101 Overcome
n=52
77.9%
§102 Overcome
n=240
81.1%
§103 Overcome
n=370
81.8%
§112 Overcome
n=270

Specialization & Scale

G06Q, Y10T, G06F
Top CPC Subclasses
10%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=886
2
Practitioners
n=886
443.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=886

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
1
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (67%)
1
Medium (17%)
1
Easy (17%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (17%)
§103 only1 (17%)
§112 only1 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
17% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
2
Business / Other
33% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WOODWORTH, II, ALLAN J 1 38.7% +40.0%
HAYES, BRET C 1 80.4% +15.3%
OBAID, HAMZEH M 1 38.3% +22.4%
ADAMS, PHILIP CHARLES 1 75.0% +0.0%
CONDO, VERONICA MARIE 1 82.0% +6.9%
O'HERN, BRENT T 1 78.5% +19.8%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18749458 AIRCRAFT BOARDING VEHICLE AND METHODS OF USE CONDO, VERONICA MARIE —

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18941335 System And Method For The Quantitative Measurement and Reduction Of Marketing Entropy Using Geometric Methods And Heuristics OBAID, HAMZEH M 5d
18385671 SEASONING BLEND CONTAINING TETRAHYDROCANNABINOL O'HERN, BRENT T 40d
19367155 LAUNCHER ADAPTATION KIT HAYES, BRET C —
18894033 Ergonomic Elevated Foot Board Device for Vehicles with a Floor Mounted Pedal or Pedals ADAMS, PHILIP CHARLES —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18941335 System And Method For The Quantitative Measurement and Reduction Of Marketing Entropy Using Geometric Methods And Heuristics OBAID, HAMZEH M 5d
18385671 SEASONING BLEND CONTAINING TETRAHYDROCANNABINOL O'HERN, BRENT T 40d
19375760 System and Method for Optical-Wave Modeling of Customer Behavior in Marketing Ecosystems WOODWORTH, II, ALLAN J —
19367155 LAUNCHER ADAPTATION KIT HAYES, BRET C —

Client Portfolio (5 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36221
36411
36241
17931

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19375760 System and Method for Optical-Wave Modeling of Customer Behavior in Marketing Ecosystems Pelatro Pte. Ltd. WOODWORTH, II, ALLAN J 3622 §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 31, 2025
19367155 LAUNCHER ADAPTATION KIT Msi Defense Solutions, LLC HAYES, BRET C 3641 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 23, 2025
18941335 System And Method For The Quantitative Measurement and Reduction Of Marketing Entropy Using Geometric Methods And Heuristics Pelatro Pte. Ltd. OBAID, HAMZEH M 3624 §101§102 Final Rejection 5d Pending Nov 08, 2024
18894033 Ergonomic Elevated Foot Board Device for Vehicles with a Floor Mounted Pedal or Pedals Niteworks LLC ADAMS, PHILIP CHARLES §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 24, 2024
18749458 AIRCRAFT BOARDING VEHICLE AND METHODS OF USE Dovetail Boarding Systems LLC CONDO, VERONICA MARIE §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 20, 2024
18385671 SEASONING BLEND CONTAINING TETRAHYDROCANNABINOL Tanya Diaz O'HERN, BRENT T 1793 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 40d Pending Oct 31, 2023

Managing Grell & Watson Patent Attorneys LLC's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month