Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Hershkovitz And Associates, Pllc

Technology areas: Chemistry & Materials • Computing & Software • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

5 pending office actions • 5 clients • 5 examiners • 4 art units • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Hershkovitz and Associates, PLLC has 1702 career applications in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering. The firm currently manages 6 pending office actions. The resolved allowance rate pct is 82.71, showing the proportion of its applications that successfully reach allowance. This history of 1702 applications provides a strong data set for assessing the firm's long-term performance in these fields.

The average office actions per allowance is 2.76. This figure indicates the typical number of office actions required to reach an allowance. With 1702 career applications and an 82.71 resolved allowance rate pct, the firm has an established record of performance. The average of 2.76 office actions per allowance provides a benchmark for the expected level of examiner interaction. The 6 pending office actions reflect the firm's current workload in its primary technology area.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1702 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

82.7%
Allowance Rate
n=1702
+0.66σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1702
2.8
OAs to Allowance
n=1301
-0.36σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=1301
1021 days
Time to Allowance
n=1301
+9.6pp
Interview Lift
n=1702
15.6%
RCE Rate
n=1702
1.9%
Appeal Rate
n=1702

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

87.5%
§101 Overcome
n=112
80.5%
§102 Overcome
n=498
82.7%
§103 Overcome
n=822
86.3%
§112 Overcome
n=577

Specialization & Scale

H04L, H04W, Y10T
Top CPC Subclasses
16%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1702
0
Practitioners
n=1702
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=1702 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
2
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (60%)
2
Medium (40%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (20%)
Double-patenting + other1 (20%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (60%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
20% of docket
1
Information Tech
20% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
2
Mechanical / Eng
40% of docket
1
Business / Other
20% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LACHICA, ERICSON M 1 30.0% +35.4%
KIM, CHRISTOPHER S 1 63.3% +21.5%
HALL JR, TYRONE VINCENT 1 76.4% +23.7%
JUNG, ANDREW J 1 57.8% +40.0%
ADAMS, MICHELLE 1 58.6% +40.5%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18079868 ADJUSTABLE FLIP STOP HALL JR, TYRONE VINCENT 190d overdue
18106392 SYSTEM FOR DETECTING FLUID FLOW IN A FLUID COMMUNICATING DEVICE AND A WATERING SYSTEM COMPRISING A FLUID FLOW DETECTING SYSTEM KIM, CHRISTOPHER S 182d overdue
17282747 USE OF A SUBSTITUTED OR UNSUBSTITUTED POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBON COMPOUND FOR HIGH-RESOLUTION MICROSCOPY ADAMS, MICHELLE —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18079868 ADJUSTABLE FLIP STOP HALL JR, TYRONE VINCENT 190d overdue
18106392 SYSTEM FOR DETECTING FLUID FLOW IN A FLUID COMMUNICATING DEVICE AND A WATERING SYSTEM COMPRISING A FLUID FLOW DETECTING SYSTEM KIM, CHRISTOPHER S 182d overdue
17752860 COMPUTER SYSTEM USING ENERGY BARRIER INSTRUCTIONS JUNG, ANDREW J 41d
18961437 CAPSULE CONTAINING BEVERAGE POWDER, IN PARTICULAR FORPREPARING BREWED COFFEE LACHICA, ERICSON M —
17282747 USE OF A SUBSTITUTED OR UNSUBSTITUTED POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBON COMPOUND FOR HIGH-RESOLUTION MICROSCOPY ADAMS, MICHELLE —

Client Portfolio (5 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37521
37231
21751
17971

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18961437 CAPSULE CONTAINING BEVERAGE POWDER, IN PARTICULAR FORPREPARING BREWED COFFEE Swiss Coffee Innovation AG LACHICA, ERICSON M §103§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 26, 2024
18106392 SYSTEM FOR DETECTING FLUID FLOW IN A FLUID COMMUNICATING DEVICE AND A WATERING SYSTEM COMPRISING A FLUID FLOW DETECTING SYSTEM 7Sense Products AS KIM, CHRISTOPHER S 3752 §102§112 Non-Final OA 182d overdue Pending Feb 06, 2023
18079868 ADJUSTABLE FLIP STOP Hui-Chuan Liao HALL JR, TYRONE VINCENT 3723 §102§103 Final Rejection 190d overdue Pending Dec 12, 2022
17752860 COMPUTER SYSTEM USING ENERGY BARRIER INSTRUCTIONS Onio AS JUNG, ANDREW J 2175 §103 Final Rejection 41d Pending May 25, 2022
17282747 USE OF A SUBSTITUTED OR UNSUBSTITUTED POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBON COMPOUND FOR HIGH-RESOLUTION MICROSCOPY Max-Planck-Gesellschaft zur Förderung der Wissenschaften e.V. ADAMS, MICHELLE 1797 §102§112Other Final Rejection — Pending Apr 02, 2021

Managing Hershkovitz And Associates, Pllc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month