Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Lamorte & Associates P.C.

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

8 pending office actions • 8 clients • 8 examiners • 4 art units • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

LAMORTE & ASSOCIATES P.C. specializes in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area, with a history of 1227 career applications. The firm maintains a resolved allowance rate of 87.08 percent, demonstrating the percentage of its applications that successfully result in a patent grant. This total of 1227 career applications indicates the firm's experience in handling mechanical and medical device disclosures.

The firm's prosecution process involves an average of 2.29 office actions per allowance. This metric represents the typical number of communications with patent examiners required to reach an allowance for a given application. Currently, the firm has 4 pending office actions, which represent its active workload within the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering practice. These 4 pending office actions are fewer than the 1227 career applications filed by the firm.

The 87.08 percent allowance rate and the 2.29 office actions per allowance provide a data-grounded basis for evaluating the firm's prosecution performance. The 4 pending office actions show the firm's immediate focus, while the 1227 career applications document its involvement in the field over time. These figures offer a view of the firm's activity and results.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1227 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

87.1%
Allowance Rate
n=1227
+0.62σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1227
2.3
OAs to Allowance
n=876
-0.62σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=876
966 days
Time to Allowance
n=876
+11.2pp
Interview Lift
n=1227
4.7%
RCE Rate
n=1227
19.1%
Appeal Rate
n=1227

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

80.0%
§101 Overcome
n=30
86.4%
§102 Overcome
n=315
82.8%
§103 Overcome
n=517
81.6%
§112 Overcome
n=321

Specialization & Scale

A63H, A63B, Y10T
Top CPC Subclasses
13%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1227
1
Practitioners
n=1227
1227.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=1227

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (25%)
4
Medium (50%)
2
Easy (25%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (38%)
§102 only1 (12%)
§112 only1 (12%)
Double-patenting only1 (12%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
62% of docket
3
Business / Other
38% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
POLLOCK, ZACHARY JOSEPH 1 26.5% +39.6%
CAUDILL, JUSTIN REED 1 56.3% +30.9%
BAYS, PAMELA M 1 71.7% +37.5%
YOUNGER, KALYN GABRIELLE 1 0.0% +0.0%
FERGUSON, MICHAEL P 1 63.4% +73.3%
WRIGHT, KIMBERLEY S 1 70.2% +18.8%
WILSON, JERICA KATLYNN 1 61.4% +39.1%
STANCZAK, MATTHEW BRIAN 1 39.2% +35.5%

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18356216 Toy Block Construction Set Made from Elastomeric Material STANCZAK, MATTHEW BRIAN 19d
19538955 Book with Audio Output and Recording Function POLLOCK, ZACHARY JOSEPH —
19054700 Audio Matching Memory Game YOUNGER, KALYN GABRIELLE —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18913773 Buffering Device for the Slide Rail of a Drawer WRIGHT, KIMBERLEY S 22d overdue
19067788 Material Characteristics Ideal for Providing Either Partial or Total Mechanical Support to the Failing or Arrested Heart and Method for Developing Ideal Characteristics for Underlying Cardiac Disorders BAYS, PAMELA M 19d
18356216 Toy Block Construction Set Made from Elastomeric Material STANCZAK, MATTHEW BRIAN 19d
19538955 Book with Audio Output and Recording Function POLLOCK, ZACHARY JOSEPH —
19183572 Carry Bag with Sliding Cut-Out Panel CAUDILL, JUSTIN REED —
18934093 Mesh Fence FERGUSON, MICHAEL P —
18815698 Formulation for a Low Viscosity Agricultural Adjuvant Applied in a Spray Syrup WILSON, JERICA KATLYNN —

Client Portfolio (8 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37112
37151
37961
36371

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19538955 Book with Audio Output and Recording Function Jast Gifts Shenzhen Company Limited POLLOCK, ZACHARY JOSEPH 3715 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Feb 12, 2026
19183572 Carry Bag with Sliding Cut-Out Panel Funko, LLC CAUDILL, JUSTIN REED DP Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 18, 2025
19067788 Material Characteristics Ideal for Providing Either Partial or Total Mechanical Support to the Failing or Arrested Heart and Method for Developing Ideal Characteristics for Underlying Cardiac Disorders Lifebridge Technologies LLC BAYS, PAMELA M 3796 §112 Final Rejection 19d Pending Feb 28, 2025
19054700 Audio Matching Memory Game Green Straw LLC YOUNGER, KALYN GABRIELLE 3711 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 14, 2025
18934093 Mesh Fence UMC Innovation Limited FERGUSON, MICHAEL P §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 31, 2024
18913773 Buffering Device for the Slide Rail of a Drawer Jieyang City Lalale Industry Co., Ltd. WRIGHT, KIMBERLEY S 3637 §102 Final Rejection 22d overdue Pending Oct 11, 2024
18815698 Formulation for a Low Viscosity Agricultural Adjuvant Applied in a Spray Syrup Forquimica Agrociencia Ltda WILSON, JERICA KATLYNN §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 26, 2024
18356216 Toy Block Construction Set Made from Elastomeric Material Goliath Ip Stichting STANCZAK, MATTHEW BRIAN 3711 §103§112 Final Rejection 19d Pending Jul 20, 2023

Managing Lamorte & Associates P.C.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month