Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lindgren, Ltd.

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

10 pending office actions • 9 clients • 10 examiners • 6 art units • 0 of 10 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

LARKIN HOFFMAN DALY & LINDGREN, LTD. operates in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area, having managed 1434 career applications. The firm has established a resolved allowance rate of 89.82 percent, which reflects the proportion of its applications that reach a grant. This record of 1434 career applications serves as the basis for the firm's experience in the mechanical and commercial sectors.

The firm's prosecution process involves an average of 3.0 office actions per allowance. This metric indicates the typical number of interactions between the firm and patent examiners before an application reaches an allowance. Currently, the firm is handling 7 pending office actions, which represent its active workload in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems sector. These 7 pending office actions are fewer than the 1434 career applications on record.

With 1434 career applications and an 89.82 percent allowance rate, the firm has a historical record of performance. The 3.0 office actions per allowance provide a benchmark for the expected duration of the prosecution cycle. The 7 pending office actions show the firm's ongoing commitment to its clients' intellectual property goals.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1434 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

89.8%
Allowance Rate
n=1434
+0.59σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1434
3.0
OAs to Allowance
n=847
-0.35σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=847
1016 days
Time to Allowance
n=847
+7.1pp
Interview Lift
n=1434
22.9%
RCE Rate
n=1434
2.2%
Appeal Rate
n=1434

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

76.1%
§101 Overcome
n=67
85.3%
§102 Overcome
n=265
85.4%
§103 Overcome
n=493
88.7%
§112 Overcome
n=363

Specialization & Scale

A01C, G06F, A01B
Top CPC Subclasses
15%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1434
1
Practitioners
n=1434
1434.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=1434

Portfolio Summary

10
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 30 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

8
Hard (80%)
2
Medium (20%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (10%)
§103 only2 (20%)
Multi-statute (no §101)7 (70%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
10% of docket
6
Mechanical / Eng
60% of docket
3
Business / Other
30% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

100 h
Manual time on pending OAs
20 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
35 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.9 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ROBLES, EILEEN 1 — —
GRAHAM, CHANTEL LORAN 1 71.7% +11.5%
KEASEL, ERIC S 1 79.7% +14.7%
PATEL, OM 1 58.6% +54.6%
NEWAY, BLAINE GIRMA 1 30.2% +39.8%
WALSH, MICHAEL THOMAS 1 77.6% +26.5%
LARKIN, DANIEL SEAN 1 82.6% +8.0%
MILLER, DANIEL A 1 34.3% +57.8%
OJIAKU, CHIKAODINAKA 1 45.9% +8.5%
BROWN, SETH RICHARD 1 48.9% +44.3%

Hard Cases (8)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18190944 EWALLET PLATFORM TO FACILITATE FLEXIBILITY IN USER TRANSACTIONS OJIAKU, CHIKAODINAKA 140d overdue
18414420 TUNING KIT AND RELATED METHOD FOR TUNING ANKLE FOOT ORTHOSIS MILLER, DANIEL A 46d overdue
18444163 CONFIGURABLE AND CUSTOMIZABLE CART WALSH, MICHAEL THOMAS 2d overdue
19092731 LIGHT THERAPY DEVICE CONFIGURED FOR OPERATION IN WET ENVIRONMENTS ROBLES, EILEEN —
18652489 CROP INPUT APPLICATION APPARATUS, SYSTEMS AND METHODS KEASEL, ERIC S —
18641174 BLOOD COLLECTION ASSEMBLY PATEL, OM —
18623896 PAPER-BASED BAKEABLE TRAY WITH DIECUTS NEWAY, BLAINE GIRMA —
18431781 FLUID COLLECTION WORKSTATION LARKIN, DANIEL SEAN —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18414420 TUNING KIT AND RELATED METHOD FOR TUNING ANKLE FOOT ORTHOSIS MILLER, DANIEL A 46d overdue
18444163 CONFIGURABLE AND CUSTOMIZABLE CART WALSH, MICHAEL THOMAS 2d overdue
18189063 STIRRUP FOR USE IN AN ANKLE FOOT ORTHOSIS BROWN, SETH RICHARD 16d
18858605 ZERO METHANE OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION FACILITY DESIGN GRAHAM, CHANTEL LORAN —
18652489 CROP INPUT APPLICATION APPARATUS, SYSTEMS AND METHODS KEASEL, ERIC S —
18641174 BLOOD COLLECTION ASSEMBLY PATEL, OM —
18623896 PAPER-BASED BAKEABLE TRAY WITH DIECUTS NEWAY, BLAINE GIRMA —

Client Portfolio (9 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37862
37531
37351
36131
28551
36921

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19092731 LIGHT THERAPY DEVICE CONFIGURED FOR OPERATION IN WET ENVIRONMENTS Alexander Gerard ROBLES, EILEEN §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 27, 2025
18858605 ZERO METHANE OIL AND GAS PRODUCTION FACILITY DESIGN Synergy Thermogen, Inc. GRAHAM, CHANTEL LORAN §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 21, 2024
18652489 CROP INPUT APPLICATION APPARATUS, SYSTEMS AND METHODS Ma Industries, LLC KEASEL, ERIC S 3753 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 01, 2024
18641174 BLOOD COLLECTION ASSEMBLY The Monarch Company, LLC PATEL, OM §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 19, 2024
18623896 PAPER-BASED BAKEABLE TRAY WITH DIECUTS Smart Packaging, LLC NEWAY, BLAINE GIRMA 3735 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Apr 01, 2024
18444163 CONFIGURABLE AND CUSTOMIZABLE CART Techmaster Carts, LLC WALSH, MICHAEL THOMAS 3613 §103§112 Final Rejection 2d overdue Pending Feb 16, 2024
18431781 FLUID COLLECTION WORKSTATION Getty Box Gizmo LLC LARKIN, DANIEL SEAN 2855 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 02, 2024
18414420 TUNING KIT AND RELATED METHOD FOR TUNING ANKLE FOOT ORTHOSIS Launchpad O & P LLC MILLER, DANIEL A 3786 §103§112 Final Rejection 46d overdue Pending Jan 16, 2024
18190944 EWALLET PLATFORM TO FACILITATE FLEXIBILITY IN USER TRANSACTIONS Craig Potts OJIAKU, CHIKAODINAKA 3692 §101 Final Rejection 140d overdue Pending Mar 27, 2023
18189063 STIRRUP FOR USE IN AN ANKLE FOOT ORTHOSIS Launchpad O &P LLC BROWN, SETH RICHARD 3786 §103 Final Rejection 16d Pending Mar 23, 2023

Managing Larkin Hoffman Daly & Lindgren, Ltd.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month