Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Law Office Of David H. Judson

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

11 pending office actions • 8 clients • 10 examiners • 7 art units • 0 of 11 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 12 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Law Office of David H. Judson focuses on the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area, with 786 career applications. The firm achieves a resolved allowance rate of 88.31 percent, indicating the proportion of its cases that successfully reach a grant. This volume of 786 career applications provides a historical basis for the firm's experience in navigating the requirements of the patent office within the life sciences sector.

The firm's prosecution process averages 3.39 office actions per allowance. This figure represents the typical number of interactions with patent examiners required to reach a grant. Currently, the firm has 6 pending office actions, which represent its active workload in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals sector. These 6 pending office actions are fewer than the 786 career applications on record.

The 88.31 percent allowance rate and the 3.39 office actions per allowance offer specific metrics for evaluating prosecution timelines. The 6 pending office actions show the firm's current focus, while the 786 career applications document its historical involvement in the field. These figures provide a data-grounded view of the firm's activity and results.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=786 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

88.3%
Allowance Rate
n=786
+0.47σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=786
3.4
OAs to Allowance
n=476
-0.09σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=476
983 days
Time to Allowance
n=476
+10.5pp
Interview Lift
n=786
33.6%
RCE Rate
n=786
1.6%
Appeal Rate
n=786

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

76.2%
§101 Overcome
n=122
82.5%
§102 Overcome
n=154
80.6%
§103 Overcome
n=278
85.0%
§112 Overcome
n=127

Specialization & Scale

G06F, H04L, G06Q
Top CPC Subclasses
48%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=786
1
Practitioners
n=786
786.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=786

Portfolio Summary

11
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

6
Hard (55%)
4
Medium (36%)
1
Easy (9%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (9%)
§101 + other3 (27%)
§103 only4 (36%)
Double-patenting only1 (9%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (18%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
18% of docket
1
Information Tech
9% of docket
1
Communications
9% of docket
1
Semiconductors
9% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
27% of docket
3
Business / Other
27% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

110 h
Manual time on pending OAs
22 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
38 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.0 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SAUNDERS, ANNA JOSEPHINE 2 76.0% +15.7%
EL-BATHY, MOHAMED N 1 28.9% +32.2%
IMPINK, MOLLIE LLEWELLYN 1 55.4% +24.7%
ABU ROUMI, MAHRAN Y 1 72.9% +32.6%
VARNDELL, ROSS E 1 84.7% +13.3%
KRIANGCHAIVECH, KETTIP 1 19.3% +28.7%
SULTANA, DILARA 1 80.9% +16.1%
PASSANITI, SEBASTIANO 1 83.0% +15.5%
NEGIN, RUSSELL SCOTT 1 55.9% +34.2%
CERVETTI, DAVID GARCIA 1 82.8% +15.3%

Quick Wins (3)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18378214 Adjustable and interchangeable modular hosel golf club assembly PASSANITI, SEBASTIANO 33d
18526661 Digital linear measuring device calibration SULTANA, DILARA —
17397103 Secure network protocol and transit system to protect communications deliverability and attribution CERVETTI, DAVID GARCIA —

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18982567 Automated product design using generative AI and attitudinal data assets EL-BATHY, MOHAMED N 28d
18915475 Versioned file system with global lock ABU ROUMI, MAHRAN Y —
18779255 Deep machine learning-assisted detection of objects of interest for live cells-based assays VARNDELL, ROSS E —
18659837 Level system with multiple level extrusions and an interchangeable level module SAUNDERS, ANNA JOSEPHINE —
18443534 Protein engineering workflow using a generative model of protein families KRIANGCHAIVECH, KETTIP —
18084757 Protein database search using learned representations NEGIN, RUSSELL SCOTT —

Interview Candidates (11)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18965874 Re-configurable and re-sizable modular storage container system IMPINK, MOLLIE LLEWELLYN 43d overdue
18982567 Automated product design using generative AI and attitudinal data assets EL-BATHY, MOHAMED N 28d
18378214 Adjustable and interchangeable modular hosel golf club assembly PASSANITI, SEBASTIANO 33d
18915475 Versioned file system with global lock ABU ROUMI, MAHRAN Y —
18779255 Deep machine learning-assisted detection of objects of interest for live cells-based assays VARNDELL, ROSS E —
18659837 Level system with multiple level extrusions and an interchangeable level module SAUNDERS, ANNA JOSEPHINE —
18659908 Level system with illumination elements for visual movement cues SAUNDERS, ANNA JOSEPHINE —
18443534 Protein engineering workflow using a generative model of protein families KRIANGCHAIVECH, KETTIP —

Client Portfolio (8 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
16862
36241
37991
26741
28581
37111
24091

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18982567 Automated product design using generative AI and attitudinal data assets Zappistore Limited EL-BATHY, MOHAMED N 3624 §101 Non-Final OA 28d Pending Dec 16, 2024
18965874 Re-configurable and re-sizable modular storage container system Vaikin Kansepts Inc. IMPINK, MOLLIE LLEWELLYN 3799 §103 Final Rejection 43d overdue Pending Dec 02, 2024
18915475 Versioned file system with global lock Nasuni Corporation ABU ROUMI, MAHRAN Y §103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 15, 2024
18779255 Deep machine learning-assisted detection of objects of interest for live cells-based assays Ctl Analyzers LLC VARNDELL, ROSS E 2674 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 22, 2024
18659837 Level system with multiple level extrusions and an interchangeable level module Reekon Tools Inc. SAUNDERS, ANNA JOSEPHINE §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 09, 2024
18659908 Level system with illumination elements for visual movement cues Reekon Tools Inc. SAUNDERS, ANNA JOSEPHINE §103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 09, 2024
18443534 Protein engineering workflow using a generative model of protein families Ne47 Bio, Inc. KRIANGCHAIVECH, KETTIP 1686 §101§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Feb 16, 2024
18526661 Digital linear measuring device calibration Reekon Tools Inc. SULTANA, DILARA 2858 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 01, 2023
18378214 Adjustable and interchangeable modular hosel golf club assembly Dogleg Right Partners, LP PASSANITI, SEBASTIANO 3711 §103 Non-Final OA 33d Pending Oct 10, 2023
18084757 Protein database search using learned representations Ne47 Bio, Inc. NEGIN, RUSSELL SCOTT 1686 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 20, 2022
17397103 Secure network protocol and transit system to protect communications deliverability and attribution Secureco, Inc. CERVETTI, DAVID GARCIA 2409 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 09, 2021

Managing Law Office Of David H. Judson's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month