Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Lewis & Reese, Pllc

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

27 pending office actions • 4 clients • 23 examiners • 6 art units • 0 of 27 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Lewis & Reese, PLLC manages a portfolio in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering with 1127 career applications. The firm maintains a resolved allowance rate of 94.77 percent for applications that reach a final resolution. Achieving these results involves an average of 3.8 office actions per allowance. Currently, the firm has 15 pending office actions to address.

The 1127 career applications and 94.77 percent allowance rate reflect the firm's practice in its primary technology area. The 3.8 average office actions per allowance provides a benchmark for expected examiner interaction during the patent acquisition process. These figures offer a data-grounded view of the firm's historical performance and current workload for practitioners evaluating the firm's Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering experience.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1127 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

94.8%
Allowance Rate
n=1127
+0.68σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1127
3.8
OAs to Allowance
n=671
+0.07σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=671
941 days
Time to Allowance
n=671
+0.9pp
Interview Lift
n=1127
31.4%
RCE Rate
n=1127
3.0%
Appeal Rate
n=1127

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

74.3%
§101 Overcome
n=70
83.6%
§102 Overcome
n=353
86.4%
§103 Overcome
n=516
85.4%
§112 Overcome
n=246

Specialization & Scale

A61N, A61B, H02J
Top CPC Subclasses
55%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1127
0
Practitioners
n=1127
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=1127 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

27
Total Pending OAs
15
Non-Final OAs
11
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 11 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

5
Overdue
1
Due this week
3
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 11 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (5)Due ≤ 7 days (1)Due ≤ 30 days (3)Due ≤ 60 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

11
Hard (41%)
15
Medium (56%)
1
Easy (4%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other3 (11%)
§103 only12 (44%)
§102 only3 (11%)
§112 only1 (4%)
Multi-statute (no §101)8 (30%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
4% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
1
Communications
4% of docket
1
Semiconductors
4% of docket
12
Mechanical / Eng
44% of docket
12
Business / Other
44% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

270 h
Manual time on pending OAs
54 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
94 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
2.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MARSH, OWEN LEWIS 2 66.7% +50.0%
HILSMIER, HEIDI ANN 2 58.3% +61.1%
BAIG, RUMAISA RASHID 2 34.0% +33.2%
SISON, CHRISTINE ANDREA PAN 2 33.3% +37.7%
WEHRHEIM, LINDSEY GAIL 1 78.8% +19.7%
WU, TONG E 1 70.8% +15.1%
DIETRICH, JOSEPH M 1 80.8% +8.6%
SCHLUETER, MARY GRACE 1 77.8% +33.3%
EDWARDS, PHILIP CHARLES 1 85.1% +15.2%
PORTER, JR, GARY A 1 68.8% +25.2%

Hard Cases (11)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18596368 Filtering Algorithm for Assessing Communications Wirelessly Received by an Implantable Medical Device COLLARD JR, DWANE EDWARD 7d
18651034 Current Mode-Based Programming for Implantable Stimulators SISON, CHRISTINE ANDREA PAN 29d
18663527 Adjustment of Stimulation in a Stimulator Using Detected Evoked Compound Action Potentials JOHNSON, NICOLE F 39d
19080381 Paresthesia-Free Spinal Cord Stimulation Occurring at Lower Frequencies and Sweet Spot Searching Using Paresthesia DIETRICH, JOSEPH M —
19055355 Assessment and Adjustment of Time-Varying Pulse Patterns in a Spinal Cord Stimulator System SCHLUETER, MARY GRACE —
19044030 Deep Brain Stimulation Neuromodulation Targeting MARSH, OWEN LEWIS —
19044098 Paresthesia-Free Spinal Cord Stimulation Occurring at Lower Frequencies Involving Perception Threshold Determinations EDWARDS, PHILIP CHARLES —
18991320 Treating Orthostatic Intolerance Conditions Using Spinal Cord Stimulation PORTER, JR, GARY A —

Interview Candidates (13)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18694300 System for In-Flight Detection of Physiological Data and Kit for In-Flight Monitoring of Physiological Parameters HILSMIER, HEIDI ANN 77d overdue
18753787 Bolus Stimulation in a Neurostimulation Device Particularly Useful in Providing Sub-Perception Stimulation BAIG, RUMAISA RASHID 15d
18651034 Current Mode-Based Programming for Implantable Stimulators SISON, CHRISTINE ANDREA PAN 29d
19201648 Stimulation Configuration Variation to Control Evoked Temporal Patterns WEHRHEIM, LINDSEY GAIL —
19090876 Precise Targeting in a Spinal Cord Stimulation System WU, TONG E —
19055355 Assessment and Adjustment of Time-Varying Pulse Patterns in a Spinal Cord Stimulator System SCHLUETER, MARY GRACE —
19044030 Deep Brain Stimulation Neuromodulation Targeting MARSH, OWEN LEWIS —
19044098 Paresthesia-Free Spinal Cord Stimulation Occurring at Lower Frequencies Involving Perception Threshold Determinations EDWARDS, PHILIP CHARLES —

Client Portfolio (4 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37969
37922
26861
28591
37001
17581

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19201648 Stimulation Configuration Variation to Control Evoked Temporal Patterns Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation WEHRHEIM, LINDSEY GAIL §102 Non-Final OA — Pending May 07, 2025
19090876 Precise Targeting in a Spinal Cord Stimulation System Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation WU, TONG E §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 26, 2025
19080381 Paresthesia-Free Spinal Cord Stimulation Occurring at Lower Frequencies and Sweet Spot Searching Using Paresthesia Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation DIETRICH, JOSEPH M §102§103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 14, 2025
19055355 Assessment and Adjustment of Time-Varying Pulse Patterns in a Spinal Cord Stimulator System Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation SCHLUETER, MARY GRACE §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 17, 2025
19044030 Deep Brain Stimulation Neuromodulation Targeting Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation MARSH, OWEN LEWIS §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 03, 2025
19044098 Paresthesia-Free Spinal Cord Stimulation Occurring at Lower Frequencies Involving Perception Threshold Determinations Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation EDWARDS, PHILIP CHARLES §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 03, 2025
18991320 Treating Orthostatic Intolerance Conditions Using Spinal Cord Stimulation Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation PORTER, JR, GARY A §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 20, 2024
18991255 Neural Sensing in an Implantable Stimulator Device During Passive Charge Recovery Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation ANTHONY, MARIA CATHERINE §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 20, 2024
18949609 Sub-Perception Spinal Cord Stimulation at Low Frequencies Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation HILSMIER, HEIDI ANN §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 15, 2024
18931821 Use of N-let Pulses in a Deep Brain Stimulation System to Selectively Treat Symptoms Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation CHRISTIANSON, SKYLAR LINDSEY §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 30, 2024
18915053 Use of Brain Anatomical Features to Optimize Deep Brain Stimulation Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation MARSH, OWEN LEWIS 3796 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 14, 2024
18901858 Passive Charge Recovery Circuitry for an Implantable Medical Device Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation EVANISKO, GEORGE ROBERT §112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 30, 2024
18791093 Determination and Use of a Wellness Factor in an Implantable Medical Device System Using Qualitative and Quantitative Measurements Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation KUO, JONATHAN T §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 31, 2024
18753787 Bolus Stimulation in a Neurostimulation Device Particularly Useful in Providing Sub-Perception Stimulation Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation BAIG, RUMAISA RASHID 3796 §103 Final Rejection 15d Pending Jun 25, 2024
18663527 Adjustment of Stimulation in a Stimulator Using Detected Evoked Compound Action Potentials Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation JOHNSON, NICOLE F 3796 §101§103 Non-Final OA 39d Pending May 14, 2024
18651034 Current Mode-Based Programming for Implantable Stimulators Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation SISON, CHRISTINE ANDREA PAN 3796 §101§103§112 Final Rejection 29d Pending Apr 30, 2024
18694300 System for In-Flight Detection of Physiological Data and Kit for In-Flight Monitoring of Physiological Parameters Aircraft Cabin Modification GmbH HILSMIER, HEIDI ANN 3796 §103 Final Rejection 77d overdue Pending Mar 21, 2024
18596368 Filtering Algorithm for Assessing Communications Wirelessly Received by an Implantable Medical Device Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation COLLARD JR, DWANE EDWARD 3792 §101§102§103 Final Rejection 7d Pending Mar 05, 2024
18399243 Remote Monitoring of Assets Machinery Monitoring Systems, LLC EUSTAQUIO, CAL J 2686 §103 Non-Final OA 26d Pending Dec 28, 2023
18497665 Spinal Cord Stimulation Occurring Using Monophasic Pulses of Alternating Polarities and Passive Charge Recovery Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation BAIG, RUMAISA RASHID 3796 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 30, 2023
18188063 Implantable Pulse Generator Charging Alerts Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation OMAR, AHMED H 2859 §103 Non-Final OA 16d overdue Pending Mar 22, 2023
17932928 Using Evoked Potentials for Brain Stimulation Therapies Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation SOLOMON, JOSHUA BRENDON 3700 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 16, 2022
17904891 Varying Optimal Sub-Perception Stimulation as a Function of Time Using a Modulation Function Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation ANJARIA, SHREYA PARAG 3796 §103 Non-Final OA 51d overdue Pending Aug 24, 2022
17816931 Multi-Chambered Ultraviolet Air Sterilizer and Purifier Calyxpure, Inc. SEGED, NEBYATE SAMUEL 1758 §103 Final Rejection 4d overdue Pending Aug 02, 2022
17757922 Techniques to Allow Patient Control of the Location in an Electrode Array at Which Sub-Perception Stimulation is Provided to Spinal Neural Tissue of a Patient Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation WEBSTER, KARMEL JOHANNA 3792 §103 Final Rejection 79d Pending Jun 23, 2022
17654343 Automatic Calibration in an Implantable Stimulator Device Having Neural Sensing Capability Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation SISON, CHRISTINE ANDREA PAN 3796 §102 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 10, 2022
17632922 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR MONITORING NEUTRAL ACTIVITY Boston Scientific Neuromodulation Corporation LEE, ERICA SHENGKAI 3796 §103 Final Rejection 4d overdue Pending Feb 04, 2022

Managing Lewis & Reese, Pllc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month