Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Martin & Ferraro, LLP

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

10 pending office actions • 6 clients • 8 examiners • 6 art units • 0 of 10 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

MARTIN & FERRARO, LLP has a history of 1295 career applications. The firm reports a resolved allowance rate of 90.75 percent. This rate is achieved with an average of 3.57 office actions per allowance. These figures summarize the firm's historical performance in patent prosecution.

The firm is currently managing 6 pending office actions. These matters are focused in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering technology area. The 1295 career applications show the firm's experience level in the patent system. The 90.75 percent resolved allowance rate provides a measure of their results in securing allowances.

The 3.57 average office actions per allowance indicates the length of the prosecution process for this firm. With 6 pending office actions, the firm continues to represent clients in the Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering field. This data set offers a clear picture of the firm's prosecution profile.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1295 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

90.8%
Allowance Rate
n=1295
+0.63σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1295
3.6
OAs to Allowance
n=903
-0.03σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=903
1142 days
Time to Allowance
n=903
+3.6pp
Interview Lift
n=1295
30.2%
RCE Rate
n=1295
2.8%
Appeal Rate
n=1295

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

89.6%
§101 Overcome
n=77
80.1%
§102 Overcome
n=261
83.5%
§103 Overcome
n=454
85.6%
§112 Overcome
n=327

Specialization & Scale

A61B, A61F, H04L
Top CPC Subclasses
31%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1295
1
Practitioners
n=1295
1295.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=1295

Portfolio Summary

10
Total Pending OAs
7
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

4
Hard (40%)
5
Medium (50%)
1
Easy (10%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only4 (40%)
§102 only1 (10%)
Double-patenting only1 (10%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (40%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
10% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
7
Mechanical / Eng
70% of docket
2
Business / Other
20% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

100 h
Manual time on pending OAs
20 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
35 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.9 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ORTIZ, RAFAEL ALFREDO 2 61.2% +35.2%
WOLFF, ARIELLE R 2 47.1% +34.7%
COTRONEO, STEVEN J 1 69.4% +31.9%
KIM, SHIN H 1 64.4% +11.5%
CHIANG, JENNIFER C 1 70.5% +30.0%
LEE, JOHN 1 30.0% +39.6%
HUYNH, NAM TRUNG 1 74.7% +11.8%
TROOST, AARON L 1 74.7% +10.5%

Hard Cases (4)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19418633 PATIENT-POSITIONING SYSTEM, COMPUTER-CONTROL AND DATA-INTEGRATION SYSTEM, SURGICAL COMPONENTRY, AND SURGICAL METHODS OF USING SAME COTRONEO, STEVEN J —
19324691 BOOKLET PACKAGING ORTIZ, RAFAEL ALFREDO —
18951520 DEODORANT CONTAINER CHIANG, JENNIFER C —
18512004 Mobile Control Unit, Facility Management System, Mobile Unit Control System, Facility Management Method, and Mobile Unit Control Method TROOST, AARON L —

Interview Candidates (10)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18537720 ULTRASONIC MIST INHALER WOLFF, ARIELLE R 89d overdue
16959940 ULTRASONIC MIST INHALER WOLFF, ARIELLE R 89d overdue
18807857 CELL LYSIS SYSTEMS AND METHODS LEE, JOHN 3d overdue
19418633 PATIENT-POSITIONING SYSTEM, COMPUTER-CONTROL AND DATA-INTEGRATION SYSTEM, SURGICAL COMPONENTRY, AND SURGICAL METHODS OF USING SAME COTRONEO, STEVEN J —
19337580 BOOKLET PACKAGING ORTIZ, RAFAEL ALFREDO —
19324691 BOOKLET PACKAGING ORTIZ, RAFAEL ALFREDO —
19200010 PLANT STAKE AND DISPLAY TAG HOLDER KIM, SHIN H —
18951520 DEODORANT CONTAINER CHIANG, JENNIFER C —

Client Portfolio (6 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37362
37852
37731
37541
17941
36661

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19418633 PATIENT-POSITIONING SYSTEM, COMPUTER-CONTROL AND DATA-INTEGRATION SYSTEM, SURGICAL COMPONENTRY, AND SURGICAL METHODS OF USING SAME Emplase Medical Technologies, LLC COTRONEO, STEVEN J 3773 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 12, 2025
19337580 BOOKLET PACKAGING Shaheen Innovations Holding Limited ORTIZ, RAFAEL ALFREDO 3736 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 23, 2025
19324691 BOOKLET PACKAGING Shaheen Innovations Holding Limited ORTIZ, RAFAEL ALFREDO 3736 §103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 10, 2025
19200010 PLANT STAKE AND DISPLAY TAG HOLDER Orora Visual LLC KIM, SHIN H DP Non-Final OA — Pending May 06, 2025
18951520 DEODORANT CONTAINER Orora Packaging Solutions CHIANG, JENNIFER C 3754 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 18, 2024
18807857 CELL LYSIS SYSTEMS AND METHODS Shaheen Innovations Holding Limited LEE, JOHN 1794 §103 Final Rejection 3d overdue Pending Aug 16, 2024
18804491 TELEPHONE NETWORK SYSTEM AND METHOD Flypsi, Inc. HUYNH, NAM TRUNG §102Other Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 14, 2024
18537720 ULTRASONIC MIST INHALER Shaheen Innovations Holding Limited WOLFF, ARIELLE R 3785 §103 Final Rejection 89d overdue Pending Dec 12, 2023
18512004 Mobile Control Unit, Facility Management System, Mobile Unit Control System, Facility Management Method, and Mobile Unit Control Method Concorde Asia Pte.Ltd. TROOST, AARON L 3666 §102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 16, 2023
16959940 ULTRASONIC MIST INHALER Shaheen Innovations Holding Limited WOLFF, ARIELLE R 3785 §103 Non-Final OA 89d overdue Pending Jul 02, 2020

Managing Martin & Ferraro, LLP's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month