Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Mbhb - Massachusetts Institute Of Technology

Technology areas: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals • Chemistry & Materials

8 pending office actions • 1 client • 8 examiners • 7 art units • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 6 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

MBHB - Massachusetts Institute of Technology has handled 106 career applications, primarily in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. The firm maintains a resolved allowance rate pct of 71.05 for these filings. Prosecution typically involves an avg office actions per allowance of 4.07.

There are 6 pending office actions currently under management for this client. These active matters are concentrated in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals sector. The 106 career applications demonstrate the firm's experience in handling academic and research-based patent portfolios.

The resolved allowance rate pct of 71.05 reflects the nature of Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals prosecution. An avg office actions per allowance of 4.07 indicates the level of interaction with the USPTO. The 6 pending office actions represent its ongoing commitment to securing patent rights for MIT.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=106 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

71.0%
Allowance Rate
n=106
+0.51σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=106
4.1
OAs to Allowance
n=27
-0.03σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=27
1102 days
Time to Allowance
n=27
+25.8pp
Interview Lift
n=106
42.1%
RCE Rate
n=106
0.0%
Appeal Rate
n=106

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=5 (min 20)
41.7%
§102 Overcome
n=24
37.0%
§103 Overcome
n=27
54.3%
§112 Overcome
n=35

Specialization & Scale

A61K, C07K, A61P
Top CPC Subclasses
48%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=106
0
Practitioners
n=106
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=106 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (62%)
3
Medium (38%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only3 (38%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (62%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

7
Life Sciences
88% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
1
Business / Other
12% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
GOLDEN, CHINESSA T 1 57.9% +4.8%
MARTINEZ, TARA L 1 62.6% +65.4%
FAN, WEIHUA 1 83.4% +12.6%
DURYEE, ALEXANDER MARSH 1 33.3% +41.6%
MYERS, CARLA J 1 49.3% +46.1%
ZHANG, KELING NMN 1 66.8% +17.6%
JANOSKO, CHASITY PAIGE 1 15.9% +63.6%
REDDEN, KAREN M 1 88.4% -21.5%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18690033 A MICROBIAL ELECTROCHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY TO DETECT AND DEGRADE ORGANOPHOSPHATE PESTICIDES FAN, WEIHUA 8d overdue
16865684 NEXT GENERATION OF LIGHT-EMITTING PLANT LONGER DURATION AND BRIGHTER REDDEN, KAREN M —

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17907603 PRECISION DELIVERY OF MULTI-SCALE PAYLOADS TO TISSUE-SPECIFIC TARGETS IN PLANTS JANOSKO, CHASITY PAIGE 30d
17978010 Facile Synthesis of Aluminum Salts Using Activated Aluminum Precursor ZHANG, KELING NMN 57d
18836731 Impermeable 2D Polymer GOLDEN, CHINESSA T —
18770880 HEME-BINDING SMALL PEPTIDE MARTINEZ, TARA L —
18476900 Protection of Next-Generation Probiotics during Processing DURYEE, ALEXANDER MARSH —
18343768 Structured Nucleic Acid Templated Architectures MYERS, CARLA J —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18690033 A MICROBIAL ELECTROCHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY TO DETECT AND DEGRADE ORGANOPHOSPHATE PESTICIDES FAN, WEIHUA 8d overdue
17907603 PRECISION DELIVERY OF MULTI-SCALE PAYLOADS TO TISSUE-SPECIFIC TARGETS IN PLANTS JANOSKO, CHASITY PAIGE 30d
17978010 Facile Synthesis of Aluminum Salts Using Activated Aluminum Precursor ZHANG, KELING NMN 57d
18770880 HEME-BINDING SMALL PEPTIDE MARTINEZ, TARA L —
18476900 Protection of Next-Generation Probiotics during Processing DURYEE, ALEXANDER MARSH —
18343768 Structured Nucleic Acid Templated Architectures MYERS, CARLA J —

Client Portfolio (1 client)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
MIT 8

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
17811
16631
16571
16821
17321
16131
16611

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18836731 Impermeable 2D Polymer Massachusetts Institute Of Technology GOLDEN, CHINESSA T 1781 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 07, 2024
18770880 HEME-BINDING SMALL PEPTIDE Massachusetts Institute Of Technology MARTINEZ, TARA L §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 12, 2024
18690033 A MICROBIAL ELECTROCHEMICAL TECHNOLOGY TO DETECT AND DEGRADE ORGANOPHOSPHATE PESTICIDES Massachusetts Institute Of Technology FAN, WEIHUA 1663 §103 Final Rejection 8d overdue Pending Mar 07, 2024
18476900 Protection of Next-Generation Probiotics during Processing Massachusetts Institute Of Technology DURYEE, ALEXANDER MARSH 1657 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 28, 2023
18343768 Structured Nucleic Acid Templated Architectures Massachusetts Institute Of Technology MYERS, CARLA J 1682 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 29, 2023
17978010 Facile Synthesis of Aluminum Salts Using Activated Aluminum Precursor Massachusetts Institute Of Technology ZHANG, KELING NMN 1732 §102§103Other Final Rejection 57d Pending Oct 31, 2022
17907603 PRECISION DELIVERY OF MULTI-SCALE PAYLOADS TO TISSUE-SPECIFIC TARGETS IN PLANTS Massachusetts Institute Of Technology JANOSKO, CHASITY PAIGE 1613 §103 Final Rejection 30d Pending Sep 28, 2022
16865684 NEXT GENERATION OF LIGHT-EMITTING PLANT LONGER DURATION AND BRIGHTER Massachusetts Institute Of Technology REDDEN, KAREN M 1661 §103 Final Rejection — Pending May 04, 2020

Managing Mbhb - Massachusetts Institute Of Technology's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month