Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Merchant & Gould P.C. - Polaris

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

11 pending office actions • 1 client • 10 examiners • 8 art units • 0 of 11 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 52 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

MERCHANT & GOULD P.C. - Polaris demonstrates a specific performance profile in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. With 175 career applications, the firm has achieved a resolved allowance rate of 95.4 percent. This rate indicates the firm's current success in securing patent grants for their clients.

The firm averages 3.11 office actions per allowance, which provides a benchmark for the expected duration of prosecution. Currently, the firm is managing 7 pending office actions. This workload is small compared to the 175 career applications. Practitioners can use the 3.11 average office actions per allowance to set client expectations for the timeline of these outstanding matters. The 95.4 percent resolved allowance rate remains the primary success metric for this portfolio. This experience informs the handling of the 7 pending office actions currently in the queue. The firm's long-term engagement with the patent office is reflected in these comprehensive metrics.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=181 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

95.6%
Allowance Rate
n=181
+0.58σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=181
3.1
OAs to Allowance
n=88
-0.18σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=88
981 days
Time to Allowance
n=88
-4.0pp
Interview Lift
n=181
41.3%
RCE Rate
n=181
0.7%
Appeal Rate
n=181

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=9 (min 20)
61.0%
§102 Overcome
n=59
65.8%
§103 Overcome
n=79
72.0%
§112 Overcome
n=50

Specialization & Scale

B62D, B60K, B62M
Top CPC Subclasses
26%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=181
0
Practitioners
n=181
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=181 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

11
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
6
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
1
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

10
Hard (91%)
1
Medium (9%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other4 (36%)
§103 only1 (9%)
Multi-statute (no §101)6 (55%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
9% of docket
1
Communications
9% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
6
Mechanical / Eng
55% of docket
3
Business / Other
27% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

110 h
Manual time on pending OAs
22 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
38 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.0 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
HAILE, BENYAM 2 61.6% +24.6%
KNUTSON, JACOB D 1 79.6% +20.5%
SHARMA, NABIN KUMAR 1 54.7% +56.6%
ESPINOZA, ABIGAIL LEE 1 72.7% +12.1%
KHONG, ALEXANDER 1 84.1% +27.8%
ARTIMEZ, DANA FERREN 1 57.7% +38.5%
ELARABI, TAREK A 1 69.5% +36.3%
DELICH, STEPHANIE ZAGARELLA 1 38.7% +36.1%
CLARE, MARK C 1 14.2% +19.9%
MILLS JR., JOE E 1 72.4% +15.5%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18711215 VEHICLE SMART TAG KHONG, ALEXANDER 6d

Hard Cases (10)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19169707 SNOWMOBILE KNUTSON, JACOB D —
19033693 VEHICLE COMMUNICATION AND MONITORING HAILE, BENYAM —
18804701 VEHICLE COMMUNICATION AND MONITORING HAILE, BENYAM —
18725540 ELECTRIC SNOWMOBILE SHARMA, NABIN KUMAR —
18678149 MANAGING LOCATION-BASED TASKS WITH A LOCATION-AWARE VEHICLE ESPINOZA, ABIGAIL LEE —
18663347 AUTONOMOUS AND SEMI-AUTONOMOUS OFF-ROAD VEHICLE CONTROL ARTIMEZ, DANA FERREN —
18657978 SECURE MULTI-BUS CONTROL SYSTEM FOR RECREATIONAL VEHICLES ELARABI, TAREK A —
18416365 VEHICLE SERVICE SCHEDULING DELICH, STEPHANIE ZAGARELLA —

Interview Candidates (11)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18711215 VEHICLE SMART TAG KHONG, ALEXANDER 6d
19169707 SNOWMOBILE KNUTSON, JACOB D —
19033693 VEHICLE COMMUNICATION AND MONITORING HAILE, BENYAM —
18804701 VEHICLE COMMUNICATION AND MONITORING HAILE, BENYAM —
18725540 ELECTRIC SNOWMOBILE SHARMA, NABIN KUMAR —
18678149 MANAGING LOCATION-BASED TASKS WITH A LOCATION-AWARE VEHICLE ESPINOZA, ABIGAIL LEE —
18663347 AUTONOMOUS AND SEMI-AUTONOMOUS OFF-ROAD VEHICLE CONTROL ARTIMEZ, DANA FERREN —
18657978 SECURE MULTI-BUS CONTROL SYSTEM FOR RECREATIONAL VEHICLES ELARABI, TAREK A —

Client Portfolio (1 client)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Polaris 11

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
26881
36571
21681
36671
36611
36231
36281
37611

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19169707 SNOWMOBILE Polaris Industries Inc. KNUTSON, JACOB D §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 03, 2025
19033693 VEHICLE COMMUNICATION AND MONITORING Polaris Industries Inc. HAILE, BENYAM §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 22, 2025
18804701 VEHICLE COMMUNICATION AND MONITORING Polaris Industries Inc. HAILE, BENYAM 2688 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 14, 2024
18725540 ELECTRIC SNOWMOBILE Polaris Industries Inc. SHARMA, NABIN KUMAR §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 28, 2024
18678149 MANAGING LOCATION-BASED TASKS WITH A LOCATION-AWARE VEHICLE Polaris Industries Inc. ESPINOZA, ABIGAIL LEE 3657 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending May 30, 2024
18711215 VEHICLE SMART TAG Polaris Industries Inc. KHONG, ALEXANDER 2168 §103 Final Rejection 6d Pending May 17, 2024
18663347 AUTONOMOUS AND SEMI-AUTONOMOUS OFF-ROAD VEHICLE CONTROL Polaris Industries Inc. ARTIMEZ, DANA FERREN 3667 §101§102§103 Final Rejection — Pending May 14, 2024
18657978 SECURE MULTI-BUS CONTROL SYSTEM FOR RECREATIONAL VEHICLES Polaris Industries Inc. ELARABI, TAREK A 3661 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending May 08, 2024
18416365 VEHICLE SERVICE SCHEDULING Polaris Industries Inc. DELICH, STEPHANIE ZAGARELLA 3623 §101§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 18, 2024
18543108 DISTRIBUTED RESOURCE ORCHESTRATION PLATFORM Polaris Industries Inc. CLARE, MARK C 3628 §101§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 18, 2023
17844303 Recreational Vehicles With Heated Steering Components Polaris Industries Inc. MILLS JR., JOE E 3761 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 20, 2022

Managing Merchant & Gould P.C. - Polaris's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month