Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Michael L. Leetzow, P.A.

Technology areas: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

8 pending office actions • 3 clients • 8 examiners • 4 art units • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Michael L. Leetzow, P.A. operates primarily within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. The firm has managed 329 career applications, demonstrating a consistent presence in this sector. Currently, there are 5 pending office actions requiring attention within their portfolio. This volume of pending work suggests an active engagement with the USPTO on behalf of their clients in the mechanical and commercial fields.

The firm maintains a resolved allowance rate pct of 81.94. This success rate is achieved with an avg office actions per allowance of 3.63. These metrics provide a baseline for understanding the firm's efficiency and effectiveness in securing patent grants. For practitioners, the avg office actions per allowance of 3.63 indicates the typical procedural duration expected when working with this firm. The resolved allowance rate pct of 81.94 reflects a strong probability of success for applications that reach a final resolution.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=329 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

81.9%
Allowance Rate
n=329
+0.68σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=329
3.6
OAs to Allowance
n=186
+0.07σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=186
1015 days
Time to Allowance
n=186
+8.4pp
Interview Lift
n=329
21.6%
RCE Rate
n=329
0.0%
Appeal Rate
n=329

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=18 (min 20)
77.1%
§102 Overcome
n=96
82.7%
§103 Overcome
n=139
81.6%
§112 Overcome
n=109

Specialization & Scale

A01D, A61B, G06Q
Top CPC Subclasses
17%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=329
1
Practitioners
n=329
329.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=329

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
8
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (62%)
2
Medium (25%)
1
Easy (12%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§112 only1 (12%)
Double-patenting + other2 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (62%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
50% of docket
4
Business / Other
50% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MENDEZ, KATHERINE H 1 66.8% +33.6%
HUTCHINS, CATHLEEN R 1 83.9% +7.9%
WEBB, SUNNY DANIELLE 1 82.1% +23.1%
WAKELY, REECE ANTHONY 1 23.8% +94.1%
YOUNG, EDWIN 1 91.4% +5.8%
MEDWAY, SCOTT J 1 66.7% +23.4%
RAILEY, JENNIFER A 1 79.5% +8.1%
TANNER, JOCELIN C 1 72.2% +34.8%

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18460781 Method and control device for operating an agricultural harvester and agricultural harvester RAILEY, JENNIFER A 91d overdue
18044286 DEVICE FOR ACHIEVING HEMOSTASIS TANNER, JOCELIN C 78d overdue
18612404 Agricultural Working Tool YOUNG, EDWIN 26d
19039178 Mower HUTCHINS, CATHLEEN R —
18975355 Mower WEBB, SUNNY DANIELLE —
18975650 Mower WAKELY, REECE ANTHONY —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18044286 DEVICE FOR ACHIEVING HEMOSTASIS TANNER, JOCELIN C 78d overdue
19068516 Vessel Sealing Device MENDEZ, KATHERINE H —
18975355 Mower WEBB, SUNNY DANIELLE —
18975650 Mower WAKELY, REECE ANTHONY —
18497964 Valve for Regulating the Flow of A Liquid MEDWAY, SCOTT J —

Client Portfolio (3 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
CLAAS 5
Cyndrx 2
BioFlo, LLC 1

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36551
37831
36761
37711

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19068516 Vessel Sealing Device Cyndrx, LLC MENDEZ, KATHERINE H §112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 03, 2025
19039178 Mower Claas Saulgau GmbH HUTCHINS, CATHLEEN R §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 28, 2025
18975355 Mower Claas Saulgau GmbH WEBB, SUNNY DANIELLE §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 10, 2024
18975650 Mower Claas Saulgau GmbH WAKELY, REECE ANTHONY §103DP Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 10, 2024
18612404 Agricultural Working Tool Claas Saulgau GmbH YOUNG, EDWIN 3655 §102§112 Non-Final OA 26d Pending Mar 21, 2024
18497964 Valve for Regulating the Flow of A Liquid Bioflo, LLC MEDWAY, SCOTT J 3783 §102§112DP Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 30, 2023
18460781 Method and control device for operating an agricultural harvester and agricultural harvester Claas Saulgau GmbH RAILEY, JENNIFER A 3676 §102§112 Non-Final OA 91d overdue Pending Sep 05, 2023
18044286 DEVICE FOR ACHIEVING HEMOSTASIS Cyndrx, LLC TANNER, JOCELIN C 3771 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 78d overdue Pending Mar 07, 2023

Managing Michael L. Leetzow, P.A.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month