Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026

Michael L. Leetzow, P.A.

6 pending office actions • 3 clients • 6 examiners • 4 art units • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Quality Metrics (n=328 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

81.8%
Allowance Rate
n=328
+0.64σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=328
3.6
OAs to Allowance
n=184
+0.07σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=184
1017 days
Time to Allowance
n=184
+8.3pp
Interview Lift
n=328
21.8%
RCE Rate
n=328
0.0%
Appeal Rate
n=328

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

§101 Overcome
n=18 (min 20)
78.7%
§102 Overcome
n=94
81.9%
§103 Overcome
n=138
82.1%
§112 Overcome
n=106

Specialization & Scale

A01D, A61B, G06Q
Top CPC Subclasses
17%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=328
1
Practitioners
n=328
328.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=328

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
0
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (83%)
1
Medium (17%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
Double-patenting + other1 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (83%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
4
Mechanical / Eng
67% of docket
2
Business / Other
33% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WAKELY, REECE ANTHONY 1 22.2% +93.3%
WEBB, SUNNY DANIELLE 1 83.9% +20.8%
YOUNG, EDWIN 1 91.4% +5.7%
KWIECINSKI, RYAN D 1 68.4% +19.5%
RAILEY, JENNIFER A 1 79.3% +8.5%
TANNER, JOCELIN C 1 72.0% +35.1%

Hard Cases (6)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18044286 DEVICE FOR ACHIEVING HEMOSTASIS TANNER, JOCELIN C 78d overdue
18581312 RECLINING MECHANISM FOR A FOLDING CHAIR KWIECINSKI, RYAN D 32d overdue
18488669 Maize Header For A Forage Harvester, And Forage Harvester Comprising Such A Maize Header RAILEY, JENNIFER A 14d
18612404 Agricultural Working Tool YOUNG, EDWIN 26d
18975650 Mower WAKELY, REECE ANTHONY
18975355 Mower WEBB, SUNNY DANIELLE

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18044286 DEVICE FOR ACHIEVING HEMOSTASIS TANNER, JOCELIN C 78d overdue
18581312 RECLINING MECHANISM FOR A FOLDING CHAIR KWIECINSKI, RYAN D 32d overdue
18975650 Mower WAKELY, REECE ANTHONY
18975355 Mower WEBB, SUNNY DANIELLE

Client Portfolio (3 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
CLAAS 4
Denovo Brands, LLC 1
Cyndrx 1

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36551
36351
36761
37711

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18975650 Mower Claas Saulgau GmbH WAKELY, REECE ANTHONY §103DP Non-Final OA Pending Dec 10, 2024
18975355 Mower Claas Saulgau GmbH WEBB, SUNNY DANIELLE §103§112 Non-Final OA Pending Dec 10, 2024
18612404 Agricultural Working Tool Claas Saulgau GmbH YOUNG, EDWIN 3655 §102§112 Non-Final OA 26d Pending Mar 21, 2024
18581312 RECLINING MECHANISM FOR A FOLDING CHAIR Denovo Brands, LLC KWIECINSKI, RYAN D 3635 §102§112 Non-Final OA 32d overdue Pending Feb 19, 2024
18488669 Maize Header For A Forage Harvester, And Forage Harvester Comprising Such A Maize Header Claas Saulgau GmbH RAILEY, JENNIFER A 3676 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 14d Pending Oct 17, 2023
18044286 DEVICE FOR ACHIEVING HEMOSTASIS Cyndrx, LLC TANNER, JOCELIN C 3771 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 78d overdue Pending Mar 07, 2023

Managing Michael L. Leetzow, P.A.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month