Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026

Parker Justiss, P.C.

8 pending office actions • 7 clients • 8 examiners • 7 art units • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Quality Metrics (n=1808 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

83.4%
Allowance Rate
n=1808
+0.44σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1808
3.6
OAs to Allowance
n=768
+0.11σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=768
1212 days
Time to Allowance
n=768
+11.8pp
Interview Lift
n=1808
29.9%
RCE Rate
n=1808
4.1%
Appeal Rate
n=1808

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

79.8%
§101 Overcome
n=89
83.4%
§102 Overcome
n=326
83.5%
§103 Overcome
n=515
85.7%
§112 Overcome
n=300

Specialization & Scale

Y10T, G06F, H04L
Top CPC Subclasses
14%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1808
4
Practitioners
n=1808
452.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=1808

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 3 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (38%)
5
Medium (62%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other1 (12%)
§103 only3 (38%)
§102 only2 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
25% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
2
Semiconductors
25% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
38% of docket
1
Business / Other
12% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SHRESTHA, BIJENDRA K 1 60.9% +40.8%
MCALLISTER, MICHAEL F 1 85.9% +6.2%
HALL, ZACHARY A 1 61.6% +49.8%
SAMUELS, LAWRENCE H 1 56.0% +37.5%
BOEHLER, ANNE MARIE M 1 67.1% +13.6%
TRAN, HAI V 1 79.0% +18.7%
OLSEN, KAELEIGH ELIZABETH 1 38.5% +72.7%
WALLS, CYNTHIA KYUNG SOO 1 71.5% -0.8%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18932270 CABLE DESIGN FOR ALL-ELECTRIC AIRCRAFT MCALLISTER, MICHAEL F

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18984289 AUTOMATED SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR COMPARING INSURANCE DOCUMENTS, HIGHLIGHTING SIMILARITIES AND VARIANCES, RECOMMENDING AN OPTIMUM INSURANCE COVERAGE, AND DELIVERING PLACEMENT INSIGHTS SHRESTHA, BIJENDRA K
18460329 A METHOD OF PRODUCING A FINISHED, AGED DISTILLED SPIRIT SAMUELS, LAWRENCE H
17927635 A NO MALODOR HAIR PERM FORMULATION AND METHOD OF USE OLSEN, KAELEIGH ELIZABETH

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18704725 DELIVERY DEVICE HALL, ZACHARY A 27d
18038811 PEDAL-DRIVE VEHICLE AND FRAME FOR A PEDAL-DRIVE VEHICLE BOEHLER, ANNE MARIE M 28d
18984289 AUTOMATED SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR COMPARING INSURANCE DOCUMENTS, HIGHLIGHTING SIMILARITIES AND VARIANCES, RECOMMENDING AN OPTIMUM INSURANCE COVERAGE, AND DELIVERING PLACEMENT INSIGHTS SHRESTHA, BIJENDRA K
18460329 A METHOD OF PRODUCING A FINISHED, AGED DISTILLED SPIRIT SAMUELS, LAWRENCE H
18036803 MOBILE NETWORK ARCHITECTURE AND METHOD OF USE THEREOF TRAN, HAI V
17927635 A NO MALODOR HAIR PERM FORMULATION AND METHOD OF USE OLSEN, KAELEIGH ELIZABETH

Client Portfolio (7 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36911
28471
36781
36111
28451
16191
17511

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18984289 AUTOMATED SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR COMPARING INSURANCE DOCUMENTS, HIGHLIGHTING SIMILARITIES AND VARIANCES, RECOMMENDING AN OPTIMUM INSURANCE COVERAGE, AND DELIVERING PLACEMENT INSIGHTS Bluepond AI, Inc. SHRESTHA, BIJENDRA K 3691 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA Pending Dec 17, 2024
18932270 CABLE DESIGN FOR ALL-ELECTRIC AIRCRAFT BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM MCALLISTER, MICHAEL F 2847 §102 Non-Final OA Pending Oct 30, 2024
18704725 DELIVERY DEVICE Rotolatch, LLC HALL, ZACHARY A 3678 §102 Non-Final OA 27d Pending Apr 25, 2024
18460329 A METHOD OF PRODUCING A FINISHED, AGED DISTILLED SPIRIT James Joseph Sanctified Spirits, LLC SAMUELS, LAWRENCE H §103§112 Non-Final OA Pending Nov 15, 2023
18038811 PEDAL-DRIVE VEHICLE AND FRAME FOR A PEDAL-DRIVE VEHICLE Freeflow Technologies Limited BOEHLER, ANNE MARIE M 3611 §103 Final Rejection 28d Pending May 25, 2023
18036803 MOBILE NETWORK ARCHITECTURE AND METHOD OF USE THEREOF Atr Electronics, LLC TRAN, HAI V 2845 §103 Non-Final OA Pending May 12, 2023
17927635 A NO MALODOR HAIR PERM FORMULATION AND METHOD OF USE Cali-Curl, LLC OLSEN, KAELEIGH ELIZABETH 1619 §103§112 Non-Final OA Pending Nov 23, 2022
17771907 SURFACE-STABILIZED LINIO2 AS HIGH CAPACITY CATHODE FOR LI ION BATTERIES BOARD OF REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SYSTEM WALLS, CYNTHIA KYUNG SOO 1751 §103 Final Rejection 59d overdue Pending Apr 26, 2022

Managing Parker Justiss, P.C.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month