Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 25, 2026

Piroozi-Ip, LLC And Prf

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

13 pending office actions • 3 clients • 13 examiners • 13 art units • 0 of 13 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 21 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Piroozi-IP, LLC and PRF has 13 pending office actions in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering and 398 career applications. The current workload is accompanied by a substantial recorded application history in device and mechanical prosecution.

The resolved allowance rate is 93.24%, and the average is 2.54 office actions per allowance. This combination indicates that most resolved matters reached allowance, generally after more than one office-action event. The profile therefore points to a practice with experience handling both successful outcomes and the iterative examination work often involved in medical-device and mechanical claims.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=398 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

93.2%
Allowance Rate
n=398
+0.52σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=398
2.5
OAs to Allowance
n=207
-0.50σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=207
819 days
Time to Allowance
n=207
-6.0pp
Interview Lift
n=398
23.9%
RCE Rate
n=398
2.8%
Appeal Rate
n=398

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

86.4%
§101 Overcome
n=22
77.6%
§102 Overcome
n=67
77.2%
§103 Overcome
n=136
82.6%
§112 Overcome
n=109

Specialization & Scale

G06F, G01N, G06T
Top CPC Subclasses
17%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=398
0
Practitioners
n=398
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=398 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

13
Total Pending OAs
8
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (2)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

10
Hard (77%)
3
Medium (23%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (15%)
§103 only3 (23%)
Multi-statute (no §101)8 (62%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

2
Life Sciences
15% of docket
2
Information Tech
15% of docket
2
Communications
15% of docket
2
Semiconductors
15% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
38% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

130 h
Manual time on pending OAs
26 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
46 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
VERA, ELISA H 1 72.4% +26.3%
OMGBA, ESSAMA 1 59.2% +32.9%
CROCKETT, JOSHUA BRIGHAM 1 82.5% +20.2%
AHMED, MOBEEN 1 61.3% +8.4%
BELL, LAUREN R 1 40.3% +32.8%
HASKINS, TWYLER LAMB 1 58.1% +8.6%
ALLI, KASIM A 1 65.8% +36.4%
GARNER, LILY CRABTREE 1 68.2% +16.3%
MUI, CHRISTINE T 1 78.4% +19.8%
TRAN, THIEN JASON 1 74.7% +18.2%

Hard Cases (10)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18238423 WIRELESSLY-POWERED IMPLANTABLE EMG RECORDING SYSTEM NATNITHITHADHA, NAVIN 1d overdue
18835723 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MOLDING OF CNF-CMC ONTO MOLDED PULP AHMED, MOBEEN 28d
18227969 POWER DEVICES WITH IMPROVED ON-RESISTANCE MAI, ANH D 72d
18889005 METHOD OF MAKING FLEXIBLE TRANSDUCERS OMGBA, ESSAMA —
18884032 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ROAD CONDITION ASSESSMENT AND FEEDBACK CROCKETT, JOSHUA BRIGHAM —
18793625 ULTRA-SHORT CHANNEL LENGTHS IN SIC MOS-BASED POWER DEVICES AND METHOD OF MAKING THE SAME BELL, LAUREN R —
18748010 METHOD FOR DIURNAL VARIATION CALIBRATION FOR PLANT PHENOTYPING HASKINS, TWYLER LAMB —
18672891 REACTOR CORE SYSTEM GARNER, LILY CRABTREE —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19088051 CONTINUOUS PROCESSING OF CELLULOSE NANOFIBRIL SHEETS THROUGH CONVENTIONAL EXTRUSION VERA, ELISA H —
18889005 METHOD OF MAKING FLEXIBLE TRANSDUCERS OMGBA, ESSAMA —
18884032 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ROAD CONDITION ASSESSMENT AND FEEDBACK CROCKETT, JOSHUA BRIGHAM —
18793625 ULTRA-SHORT CHANNEL LENGTHS IN SIC MOS-BASED POWER DEVICES AND METHOD OF MAKING THE SAME BELL, LAUREN R —
18674820 METHOD FOR SECURE, SIMPLE, AND FAST SPECULATIVE EXECUTION ALLI, KASIM A —
18672891 REACTOR CORE SYSTEM GARNER, LILY CRABTREE —
18657406 MICROFLUIDIC SYSTEM AND METHOD OF USE AND MEASUREMENT MUI, CHRISTINE T —
18608768 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR STIMULUS FEEDBACK INTERVENTION TRAN, THIEN JASON —

Client Portfolio (3 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
17481
37461
26611
37311
28961
26391
21831
36461
17971
37921

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19088051 CONTINUOUS PROCESSING OF CELLULOSE NANOFIBRIL SHEETS THROUGH CONVENTIONAL EXTRUSION U.S. Department Of Agriculture VERA, ELISA H 1748 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 24, 2025
18889005 METHOD OF MAKING FLEXIBLE TRANSDUCERS Purdue Research Foundation OMGBA, ESSAMA 3746 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 18, 2024
18884032 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR ROAD CONDITION ASSESSMENT AND FEEDBACK Purdue Research Foundation CROCKETT, JOSHUA BRIGHAM 2661 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 12, 2024
18835723 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR MOLDING OF CNF-CMC ONTO MOLDED PULP Purdue Research Foundation AHMED, MOBEEN 3731 §103§112 Final Rejection 28d Pending Aug 03, 2024
18793625 ULTRA-SHORT CHANNEL LENGTHS IN SIC MOS-BASED POWER DEVICES AND METHOD OF MAKING THE SAME Purdue Research Foundation BELL, LAUREN R 2896 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 02, 2024
18748010 METHOD FOR DIURNAL VARIATION CALIBRATION FOR PLANT PHENOTYPING Purdue Research Foundation HASKINS, TWYLER LAMB 2639 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 19, 2024
18674820 METHOD FOR SECURE, SIMPLE, AND FAST SPECULATIVE EXECUTION Purdue Research Foundation ALLI, KASIM A 2183 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 25, 2024
18672891 REACTOR CORE SYSTEM UT-BATTELLE, LLC GARNER, LILY CRABTREE 3646 §102§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending May 23, 2024
18657406 MICROFLUIDIC SYSTEM AND METHOD OF USE AND MEASUREMENT Purdue Research Foundation MUI, CHRISTINE T 1797 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 07, 2024
18608768 SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR STIMULUS FEEDBACK INTERVENTION Purdue Research Foundation TRAN, THIEN JASON 3792 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 18, 2024
18689861 MEMORY MANAGEMENT METHOD FOR PSEUDO-FUNCTIONAL DIFFERENTIABLE PROGRAMMING Purdue Research Foundation TSAI, SHENG JEN 2139 §103 Final Rejection 16d Pending Mar 06, 2024
18238423 WIRELESSLY-POWERED IMPLANTABLE EMG RECORDING SYSTEM Purdue Research Foundation NATNITHITHADHA, NAVIN 3791 §103§112 Non-Final OA 1d overdue Pending Aug 25, 2023
18227969 POWER DEVICES WITH IMPROVED ON-RESISTANCE Purdue Research Foundation MAI, ANH D 2893 §103§112 Final Rejection 72d Pending Jul 30, 2023

Managing Piroozi-Ip, LLC And Prf's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Piroozi-Ip, LLC And Prf's patent allowance rate?

93.2% of resolved applications prosecuted by Piroozi-Ip, LLC And Prf were allowed, across 398 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Piroozi-Ip, LLC And Prf average before allowance?

2.54 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Piroozi-Ip, LLC And Prf have?

13 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 3 clients, before 13 examiners in 13 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month