Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Polson Intellectual Property Law P.C.

Technology area: Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering

8 pending office actions • 7 clients • 8 examiners • 6 art units • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Polson Intellectual Property Law P.C. manages 1255 career applications in Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering. The firm has a high resolved allowance rate of 94.87 percent. Prosecution is exceptionally efficient, with an average of 1.4 office actions per allowance. There are 11 pending office actions currently.

The 94.87 percent allowance rate is a strong indicator of success. The 1.4 office actions per allowance metric suggests a very direct path to allowance. With 1255 career applications, the firm has a substantial and successful track record. This combination of a high success rate and low examiner interaction makes the firm a notable performer.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=1255 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

94.9%
Allowance Rate
n=1255
+0.39σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=1255
1.4
OAs to Allowance
n=1055
-1.40σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=1055
867 days
Time to Allowance
n=1055
-0.6pp
Interview Lift
n=1255
7.7%
RCE Rate
n=1255
0.5%
Appeal Rate
n=1255

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=10 (min 20)
87.1%
§102 Overcome
n=171
80.4%
§103 Overcome
n=250
87.2%
§112 Overcome
n=343

Specialization & Scale

A63G, A45D, B60R
Top CPC Subclasses
9%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=1255
1
Practitioners
n=1255
1255.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=1255

Portfolio Summary

8
Total Pending OAs
5
Non-Final OAs
3
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

1
Hard (12%)
5
Medium (62%)
2
Easy (25%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only5 (62%)
§112 only2 (25%)
Multi-statute (no §101)1 (12%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
1
Semiconductors
12% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
38% of docket
4
Business / Other
50% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

80 h
Manual time on pending OAs
16 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
28 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
MALDONADO, STEVEN 1 26.9% +42.9%
WELCH, DAVID T 1 81.3% +26.7%
MANCINI, EVAN THOMAS 1 57.8% +33.6%
BOHANNON, PAUL D 1 97.9% +0.6%
WOLFLEY, MARK DAVID 1 97.2% +3.1%
NGUYEN, NHAT HUY T 1 53.8% +23.4%
PRESSLEY, PAUL DEREK 1 60.5% +28.1%
WAN, DEMING 1 76.4% +42.4%

Quick Wins (3)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19001248 METHOD FOR DETERMINING MODEL ARRANGEMENT INFORMATION, ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM WELCH, DAVID T —
35525776 Massaging chair BOHANNON, PAUL D —
35525629 Easy chair WOLFLEY, MARK DAVID —

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19066709 MEDICAL DEVICE WITH BEADED STRUCTURE FOR LOCALIZATION AND MARKING MALDONADO, STEVEN —
18549994 Method to manufacture a cable tray component, crimp press to manufacture such cable tray component and cable tray component manufactured therewith PRESSLEY, PAUL DEREK —

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18547761 Dryer And Drying Unit For Drying Paper Tubes WAN, DEMING 3d overdue
19066709 MEDICAL DEVICE WITH BEADED STRUCTURE FOR LOCALIZATION AND MARKING MALDONADO, STEVEN —
19001248 METHOD FOR DETERMINING MODEL ARRANGEMENT INFORMATION, ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM WELCH, DAVID T —
18924553 DRY BLOCK TEMPERATURE CALIBRATOR MANCINI, EVAN THOMAS —
18412819 Computer Implemented Classification Tool And Method For Classification Of Microelectrode Recordings Taken During A Deep Brain Stimulation NGUYEN, NHAT HUY T —
18549994 Method to manufacture a cable tray component, crimp press to manufacture such cable tray component and cable tray component manufactured therewith PRESSLEY, PAUL DEREK —

Client Portfolio (7 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
37971
28551
29511
29311
37251
37621

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19066709 MEDICAL DEVICE WITH BEADED STRUCTURE FOR LOCALIZATION AND MARKING Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University MALDONADO, STEVEN 3797 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 28, 2025
19001248 METHOD FOR DETERMINING MODEL ARRANGEMENT INFORMATION, ELECTRONIC DEVICE AND STORAGE MEDIUM Hangzhou Qunhe Information Technology Co., Ltd. WELCH, DAVID T §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 24, 2024
18924553 DRY BLOCK TEMPERATURE CALIBRATOR Presys Instrumentos E Sistemas Ltda MANCINI, EVAN THOMAS 2855 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 23, 2024
35525776 Massaging chair Ceragem Co., Ltd. BOHANNON, PAUL D 2951 §112 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 05, 2024
35525629 Easy chair Ceragem Co., Ltd. WOLFLEY, MARK DAVID 2931 §112 Final Rejection — Pending Jun 27, 2024
18412819 Computer Implemented Classification Tool And Method For Classification Of Microelectrode Recordings Taken During A Deep Brain Stimulation Naukowa I Akademicka Siec Komputerowa – Panstwowy Instytut Badawczy NGUYEN, NHAT HUY T §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 15, 2024
18549994 Method to manufacture a cable tray component, crimp press to manufacture such cable tray component and cable tray component manufactured therewith Obo Bettermann Produktion Deutschland GmbH & Co. Kg PRESSLEY, PAUL DEREK 3725 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 11, 2023
18547761 Dryer And Drying Unit For Drying Paper Tubes International Tobacco Machinery Poland Sp. Z O.O. WAN, DEMING 3762 §103 Non-Final OA 3d overdue Pending Aug 24, 2023

Managing Polson Intellectual Property Law P.C.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month