Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 06, 2026

Qubit Ip, Pllc

12 pending office actions • 4 clients • 11 examiners • 6 art units • 0 of 12 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Quality Metrics (n=74 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

96.2%
Allowance Rate
n=74
+0.52σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=74
3.6
OAs to Allowance
n=25
-0.26σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=25
822 days
Time to Allowance
n=25
+12.5pp
Interview Lift
n=74
96.2%
RCE Rate
n=74
0.0%
Appeal Rate
n=74

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

§101 Overcome
n=11 (min 20)
38.5%
§102 Overcome
n=26
42.1%
§103 Overcome
n=38
42.9%
§112 Overcome
n=28

Specialization & Scale

G02C, B29D, G02B
Top CPC Subclasses
42%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=74
0
Practitioners
n=74
Apps / Practitioner
n=74 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

12
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 7 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

4
Overdue
0
Due this week
3
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 7 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (4)Due ≤ 30 days (3)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (42%)
6
Medium (50%)
1
Easy (8%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (17%)
§103 only5 (42%)
§102 only1 (8%)
§112 only1 (8%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (25%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

1
Life Sciences
8% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
4
Semiconductors
33% of docket
5
Mechanical / Eng
42% of docket
2
Business / Other
17% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

120 h
Manual time on pending OAs
24 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
42 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
WILKES, ZACHARY W 2 66.5% +22.2%
TRAN, MAI THI NGOC 1 85.9% +4.3%
RICKEL, ALEX PARK 1 71.7% +13.7%
NGUYEN, LAM S 1 78.8% +0.9%
WEINERTH, GIDEON R 1 57.4% +15.0%
SMITH, JACOB A 1 81.7% +17.9%
MELLOTT, JAMES M 1 50.8% +45.3%
FERRERO, EDUARDO R 1 62.0% +43.6%
GARNER, LILY CRABTREE 1 68.2% +15.2%
GERTH, KATIE L 1 75.1% +16.9%

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18647121 PROGRESSIVE SPECTACLE LENS WILKES, ZACHARY W 27d
18693027 MACHINE AND METHOD FOR RUNNING A MACHINE SMITH, JACOB A 29d
19004709 SET OF VIRTUAL REPRESENTATION DATA OF A SPECTACLE LENS AND METHOD AND DEVICE FOR GENERATING SUCH TRAN, MAI THI NGOC
18777948 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING AT LEAST ONE VISUAL PARAMETER RICKEL, ALEX PARK
17905216 METHOD, APPARATUS, DEVICE AND SYSTEM FOR THE GENERATION OF ELECTRICITY GARNER, LILY CRABTREE

Interview Candidates (9)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18360595 METHOD AND LENS HOLDER FOR TINTING A SPECTACLE LENS MELLOTT, JAMES M 189d overdue
17782041 WORKING TOOL GERTH, KATIE L 88d overdue
17721630 COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHOD FOR INDIVIDUALISING A SPECTACLE FRAME ELEMENT BY DETERMINING A PARAMETRIC SUBSTITUTION MODEL OF A SPECTACLE FRAME ELEMENT, AND DEVICE AND SYSTEMS USING SUCH A METHOD WILKES, ZACHARY W 71d overdue
18740123 DRINKING VESSEL WITH COVERING, AND HANDBAG AND HOLDING DEVICE FOR DRINKING VESSEL WEINERTH, GIDEON R 45d overdue
18647121 PROGRESSIVE SPECTACLE LENS WILKES, ZACHARY W 27d
18693027 MACHINE AND METHOD FOR RUNNING A MACHINE SMITH, JACOB A 29d
18777948 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING AT LEAST ONE VISUAL PARAMETER RICKEL, ALEX PARK
18019345 MACHINE AND METHOD FOR RUNNING A MACHINE FERRERO, EDUARDO R

Client Portfolio (4 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
Carl Zeiss 7
Hilti 3
AnnLee GmbH 1
Suneel Navnitdas Parekh 1

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
28723
37313
28531
37361
17591
36461

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19004709 SET OF VIRTUAL REPRESENTATION DATA OF A SPECTACLE LENS AND METHOD AND DEVICE FOR GENERATING SUCH Carl Zeiss Vision International GmbH TRAN, MAI THI NGOC §102§103 Non-Final OA Pending Dec 30, 2024
18777948 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING AT LEAST ONE VISUAL PARAMETER Carl Zeiss Vision International GmbH RICKEL, ALEX PARK §103§112 Non-Final OA Pending Jul 19, 2024
18747800 COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHOD FOR DETERMINING PRINTING PARAMETER VALUES OF AN INKJET PRINTING DEVICE, A DATA PROCESSING SYSTEM, A METHOD FOR INKJET PRINTING AND AN INKJET PRINTING DEVICE Carl Zeiss Vision International GmbH NGUYEN, LAM S 2853 §103 Final Rejection 21d Pending Jun 19, 2024
18740123 DRINKING VESSEL WITH COVERING, AND HANDBAG AND HOLDING DEVICE FOR DRINKING VESSEL AnnLee GmbH WEINERTH, GIDEON R 3736 §103 Final Rejection 45d overdue Pending Jun 11, 2024
18647121 PROGRESSIVE SPECTACLE LENS Carl Zeiss Vision International GmbH WILKES, ZACHARY W 2872 §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA 27d Pending Apr 26, 2024
18693027 MACHINE AND METHOD FOR RUNNING A MACHINE Hilti Aktiengesellschaft SMITH, JACOB A 3731 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 29d Pending Mar 18, 2024
18360595 METHOD AND LENS HOLDER FOR TINTING A SPECTACLE LENS Carl Zeiss Vision International GmbH MELLOTT, JAMES M 1759 §112 Non-Final OA 189d overdue Pending Jul 27, 2023
18019345 MACHINE AND METHOD FOR RUNNING A MACHINE Hilti Aktiengesellschaft FERRERO, EDUARDO R 3731 §103 Final Rejection Pending Feb 02, 2023
17905216 METHOD, APPARATUS, DEVICE AND SYSTEM FOR THE GENERATION OF ELECTRICITY Suneel Navnitdas Parekh GARNER, LILY CRABTREE 3646 §101§102§112 Final Rejection Pending Aug 29, 2022
17782041 WORKING TOOL Hilti Aktiengesellschaft GERTH, KATIE L 3731 §103 Non-Final OA 88d overdue Pending Jun 02, 2022
17721630 COMPUTER-IMPLEMENTED METHOD FOR INDIVIDUALISING A SPECTACLE FRAME ELEMENT BY DETERMINING A PARAMETRIC SUBSTITUTION MODEL OF A SPECTACLE FRAME ELEMENT, AND DEVICE AND SYSTEMS USING SUCH A METHOD Carl Zeiss Vision International GmbH WILKES, ZACHARY W 2872 §102 Final Rejection 71d overdue Pending Apr 15, 2022
17406293 INTERFERENCE LAYER SYSTEM WITHOUT A CARRIER SUBSTRATE, METHOD FOR PRODUCING SAME, AND USE THEREOF Carl Zeiss Vision International GmbH HUSTOFT, JUSTIN WAYNE 2872 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Aug 19, 2021

Managing Qubit Ip, Pllc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month