Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 21, 2026

Reising Ethington-Borgwarner

Technology areas: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

6 pending office actions • 2 clients • 6 examiners • 5 art units • 0 of 6 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 14 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

REISING ETHINGTON-BORGWARNER focuses on the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area with 188 career applications. The firm has secured a resolved allowance rate pct of 86.96. Prosecution requires 2.98 average office actions per allowance, and there are 6 pending office actions currently active.

The 86.96 resolved allowance rate pct across 188 career applications shows a consistent ability to obtain patents in the semiconductor field. The 2.98 average office actions per allowance provides a benchmark for the expected duration of the prosecution cycle. This average suggests that most applications reach allowance after approximately three rounds of correspondence.

With 6 pending office actions, the firm maintains a presence in Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics. The 86.96 resolved allowance rate pct indicates that the firm's strategy is effective for its 188 career applications. Practitioners can use the 2.98 average office actions per allowance to estimate the resources needed for successful prosecution in this technical domain.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=189 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

87.1%
Allowance Rate
n=189
+0.45σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=189
3.0
OAs to Allowance
n=101
-0.22σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=101
789 days
Time to Allowance
n=101
+10.3pp
Interview Lift
n=189
21.6%
RCE Rate
n=189
7.6%
Appeal Rate
n=189

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

—
§101 Overcome
n=2 (min 20)
68.3%
§102 Overcome
n=60
73.8%
§103 Overcome
n=80
82.7%
§112 Overcome
n=52

Specialization & Scale

F01L, F16H, B60L
Top CPC Subclasses
38%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=189
0
Practitioners
n=189
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=189 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

6
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 1 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

3
Hard (50%)
3
Medium (50%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only1 (17%)
§102 only2 (33%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (50%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
4
Semiconductors
67% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
17% of docket
1
Business / Other
17% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

60 h
Manual time on pending OAs
12 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
21 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.5 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LANE, NICHOLAS J 1 65.8% +6.9%
BROWN, JOSEPH HENRY 1 60.3% +38.0%
PEREZ, BRYAN REYNALDO 1 83.9% +13.8%
DHAKAL, BICKEY 1 84.2% +16.5%
HENZE, DAVID V 1 69.7% +23.2%
ORTIZ, ELIM 1 79.4% +22.8%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18649296 VARIABLE FREQUENCY PULSED ELECTRIC MACHINE CONTROL SYSTEM DHAKAL, BICKEY 53d

Hard Cases (3)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18988074 PILOT VALVE SEAT AND ELECTROMAGNETIC VALVE LANE, NICHOLAS J —
18939584 ELECTRIC VEHICLE (EV) GEARBOX ASSEMBLY BROWN, JOSEPH HENRY —
18753325 THREE PHASE TO SINGLE PHASE POWER SUPPLY EQUIPMENT PEREZ, BRYAN REYNALDO —

Interview Candidates (5)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18649296 VARIABLE FREQUENCY PULSED ELECTRIC MACHINE CONTROL SYSTEM DHAKAL, BICKEY 53d
18939584 ELECTRIC VEHICLE (EV) GEARBOX ASSEMBLY BROWN, JOSEPH HENRY —
18753325 THREE PHASE TO SINGLE PHASE POWER SUPPLY EQUIPMENT PEREZ, BRYAN REYNALDO —
18702475 ELECTRIC VEHICLE SUPPLY EQUIPMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM HENZE, DAVID V —
18638776 STATIONARY BATTERY ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGERS WITH ENHANCED POWER MODULES ORTIZ, ELIM —

Client Portfolio (2 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36181
28381
28961
28591
28361

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18988074 PILOT VALVE SEAT AND ELECTROMAGNETIC VALVE Borgwarner Automotive Components (Tianjin) Co., Ltd. LANE, NICHOLAS J §102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 19, 2024
18939584 ELECTRIC VEHICLE (EV) GEARBOX ASSEMBLY BORGWARNER, INC. BROWN, JOSEPH HENRY 3618 §102§103 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 07, 2024
18753325 THREE PHASE TO SINGLE PHASE POWER SUPPLY EQUIPMENT BORGWARNER, INC. PEREZ, BRYAN REYNALDO 2838 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 25, 2024
18649296 VARIABLE FREQUENCY PULSED ELECTRIC MACHINE CONTROL SYSTEM BORGWARNER, INC. DHAKAL, BICKEY 2896 §102 Final Rejection 53d Pending Apr 29, 2024
18702475 ELECTRIC VEHICLE SUPPLY EQUIPMENT MANAGEMENT SYSTEM BORGWARNER, INC. HENZE, DAVID V 2859 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 18, 2024
18638776 STATIONARY BATTERY ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGERS WITH ENHANCED POWER MODULES BORGWARNER, INC. ORTIZ, ELIM 2836 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 18, 2024

Managing Reising Ethington-Borgwarner's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Frequently Asked Questions

What is Reising Ethington-Borgwarner's patent allowance rate?

87.1% of resolved applications prosecuted by Reising Ethington-Borgwarner were allowed, across 189 applications in USPTO records.

How many office actions does Reising Ethington-Borgwarner average before allowance?

2.97 office actions per allowed application on average.

How many pending office actions does Reising Ethington-Borgwarner have?

6 pending office actions as of October 2026, for 2 clients, before 6 examiners in 5 art units.

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month