Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Shield Intellectual Property Pc

Technology area: Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

13 pending office actions • 5 clients • 11 examiners • 10 art units • 0 of 13 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

Shield Intellectual Property PC works in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area with 898 career applications. The firm has a resolved allowance rate of 95.58 percent. It currently manages 11 pending office actions. These metrics offer a view into the firm's historical performance and current active matters.

The firm averages 3.9 office actions per allowance. This average of 3.9 office actions and the 95.58 percent allowance rate describe the firm's results for its 898 career applications. The 11 pending office actions represent the firm's current workload in transportation and e-commerce. Practitioners can look to the 95.58 percent allowance rate as an indicator of the firm's success in resolving applications. The 3.9 average provides a timeframe for the expected number of interactions with the USPTO before an allowance is issued.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=898 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

95.6%
Allowance Rate
n=898
+0.63σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=898
3.9
OAs to Allowance
n=649
+0.11σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=649
884 days
Time to Allowance
n=649
+2.8pp
Interview Lift
n=898
35.2%
RCE Rate
n=898
2.3%
Appeal Rate
n=898

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

88.0%
§101 Overcome
n=142
89.2%
§102 Overcome
n=185
89.9%
§103 Overcome
n=407
92.0%
§112 Overcome
n=226

Specialization & Scale

H04L, G06F, H04N
Top CPC Subclasses
46%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=898
0
Practitioners
n=898
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=898 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

13
Total Pending OAs
8
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
1
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
3
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (3)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

11
Hard (85%)
2
Medium (15%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (8%)
§101 + other8 (62%)
§103 only2 (15%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (15%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
8% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
11
Mechanical / Eng
85% of docket
1
Business / Other
8% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

130 h
Manual time on pending OAs
26 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
46 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
ALVAREZ, RAQUEL 2 49.6% +7.2%
AUSTIN, JAMIE H 2 24.8% +33.2%
MOORE, WHITNEY 1 88.1% +10.1%
TAYLOR, JOSHUA D 1 59.2% +30.8%
ABRAHAM, JOSE K 1 83.2% +32.9%
HELLNER, MARK 1 90.4% +8.5%
MILLER, PRESTON JAY 1 54.2% +24.4%
ANDREI, RADU 1 36.3% +20.0%
KANG, TIMOTHY J 1 45.7% +26.8%
NASRI, MARYAM A 1 73.6% +2.7%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18383793 PER LAYER ANTI-PAD STRUCTURE FOR BALL GRID ARRAY PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURE ABRAHAM, JOSE K 2d overdue

Hard Cases (11)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18101107 Online Asset Recommendation System ALVAREZ, RAQUEL 8d overdue
18231642 ENSEMBLE-BASED MULTIMEDIA ASSET RECOMMENDATION SYSTEM ALVAREZ, RAQUEL 21d
18086192 INTELLIGENT SPEED CHECK MILLER, PRESTON JAY 22d
16809430 SELECTING DIGITAL MEDIA ASSETS BASED ON TRANSITIONS ACROSS CATEGORIES AUSTIN, JAMIE H 28d
18100286 SELECTING DIGITAL MEDIA ASSETS BASED ON TRANSITIONS ACROSS CATEGORIES AUSTIN, JAMIE H 34d
19007376 MOTORCYCLE LANE SPLITTING DETECTION SYSTEM MOORE, WHITNEY —
18967560 MITIGATING COSTS OF PRESENTATION AND DELIVERY OF DIGITAL MEDIA ASSETS BASED ON GEOGRAPHICALLY DISTRIBUTED CACHE MEMORY CONTENTS TAYLOR, JOSHUA D —
18373512 HYBRID 3D SENSING USING TIME-OF-FLIGHT, EVENT-BASED STRUCTURED LIGHT AND STEREO VISION HELLNER, MARK —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18383793 PER LAYER ANTI-PAD STRUCTURE FOR BALL GRID ARRAY PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURE ABRAHAM, JOSE K 2d overdue
18086192 INTELLIGENT SPEED CHECK MILLER, PRESTON JAY 22d
16809430 SELECTING DIGITAL MEDIA ASSETS BASED ON TRANSITIONS ACROSS CATEGORIES AUSTIN, JAMIE H 28d
18100286 SELECTING DIGITAL MEDIA ASSETS BASED ON TRANSITIONS ACROSS CATEGORIES AUSTIN, JAMIE H 34d
19007376 MOTORCYCLE LANE SPLITTING DETECTION SYSTEM MOORE, WHITNEY —
18967560 MITIGATING COSTS OF PRESENTATION AND DELIVERY OF DIGITAL MEDIA ASSETS BASED ON GEOGRAPHICALLY DISTRIBUTED CACHE MEMORY CONTENTS TAYLOR, JOSHUA D —
17949811 DUAL-OPTIMIZATION OF TARGETED DIGITAL ASSETS UNDER VOLUME AND POSITION CONSTRAINTS ANDREI, RADU —
17942686 METHOD, NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIA, AND SYSTEM FOR PRESENTATION OF DIGITAL MEDIA ASSETS BASED ON ASSESSED VALUE KANG, TIMOTHY J —

Client Portfolio (5 clients)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
IRIS.TV, INC. 7
Volkswagen 3
Astera Labs 1
CARIAD SE 1
Dolby 1

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36222
36252
36461
37291
36451
36611
36971
36891
24831
36281

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19007376 MOTORCYCLE LANE SPLITTING DETECTION SYSTEM Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft MOORE, WHITNEY 3646 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 31, 2024
18967560 MITIGATING COSTS OF PRESENTATION AND DELIVERY OF DIGITAL MEDIA ASSETS BASED ON GEOGRAPHICALLY DISTRIBUTED CACHE MEMORY CONTENTS Iris.Tv, Inc. TAYLOR, JOSHUA D §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 03, 2024
18383793 PER LAYER ANTI-PAD STRUCTURE FOR BALL GRID ARRAY PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURE Astera Labs, Inc. ABRAHAM, JOSE K 3729 §103 Non-Final OA 2d overdue Pending Oct 25, 2023
18373512 HYBRID 3D SENSING USING TIME-OF-FLIGHT, EVENT-BASED STRUCTURED LIGHT AND STEREO VISION Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft HELLNER, MARK 3645 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 27, 2023
18231642 ENSEMBLE-BASED MULTIMEDIA ASSET RECOMMENDATION SYSTEM Iris.Tv, Inc. ALVAREZ, RAQUEL 3622 §101DP Non-Final OA 21d Pending Aug 08, 2023
18101107 Online Asset Recommendation System Iris.Tv, Inc. ALVAREZ, RAQUEL 3622 §101 Non-Final OA 8d overdue Pending Jan 24, 2023
18100286 SELECTING DIGITAL MEDIA ASSETS BASED ON TRANSITIONS ACROSS CATEGORIES Iris.Tv, Inc. AUSTIN, JAMIE H 3625 §101§112 Non-Final OA 34d Pending Jan 23, 2023
18086192 INTELLIGENT SPEED CHECK Cariad SE MILLER, PRESTON JAY 3661 §101§103 Non-Final OA 22d Pending Dec 21, 2022
17949811 DUAL-OPTIMIZATION OF TARGETED DIGITAL ASSETS UNDER VOLUME AND POSITION CONSTRAINTS Iris.Tv, Inc. ANDREI, RADU 3697 §101§103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 21, 2022
17942686 METHOD, NON-TRANSITORY COMPUTER-READABLE STORAGE MEDIA, AND SYSTEM FOR PRESENTATION OF DIGITAL MEDIA ASSETS BASED ON ASSESSED VALUE Iris.Tv, Inc. KANG, TIMOTHY J 3689 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 12, 2022
17900738 VIRTUAL REALITY CINEMA-IMMERSIVE MOVIE WATCHING FOR HEADMOUNTED DISPLAYS Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation NASRI, MARYAM A 2483 §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 31, 2022
17874753 METHOD FOR REDUCING CARBON FOOTPRINT LEVERAGING A COST FUNCTION FOR FOCUSED OPTIMIZATION Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft GODBOLD, DAVID GARRISON 3628 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 27, 2022
16809430 SELECTING DIGITAL MEDIA ASSETS BASED ON TRANSITIONS ACROSS CATEGORIES Iris.Tv, Inc. AUSTIN, JAMIE H 3625 §101§103 Final Rejection 28d Pending Mar 04, 2020

Managing Shield Intellectual Property Pc's Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month