Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Weiss & Moy, P.C.

Technology areas: Communications • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

19 pending office actions • 9 clients • 19 examiners • 10 art units • 0 of 19 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

WEISS & MOY, P.C. handles patent prosecution in the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area, with 2030 career applications on record. The firm has a resolved allowance rate of 68.95 percent. Its prosecution history shows an average of 2.56 office actions per allowance. Currently, the firm is managing 9 pending office actions.

The 2030 career applications and 68.95 percent allowance rate establish the firm's historical performance in this sector. The 2.56 average helps practitioners understand the typical procedural requirements for reaching an allowance. With 9 pending office actions, the firm maintains its presence in Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems. This data set reflects the firm's documented experience and current workload within the patent office. The recorded metrics provide a baseline for procedural duration in this specific field. Practitioners can evaluate the intensity of examiner interaction and resource requirements based on these historical figures. These statistics offer a view of the firm's prosecution profile.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=2030 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

69.0%
Allowance Rate
n=2030
+0.29σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=2030
2.6
OAs to Allowance
n=1146
-0.44σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=1146
1011 days
Time to Allowance
n=1146
+9.8pp
Interview Lift
n=2030
12.4%
RCE Rate
n=2030
1.3%
Appeal Rate
n=2030

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

68.5%
§101 Overcome
n=111
68.9%
§102 Overcome
n=466
70.1%
§103 Overcome
n=686
79.2%
§112 Overcome
n=471

Specialization & Scale

G06Q, Y10T, H01L
Top CPC Subclasses
9%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=2030
0
Practitioners
n=2030
—
Apps / Practitioner
n=2030 (min 20)

Portfolio Summary

19
Total Pending OAs
15
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
2
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

11
Hard (58%)
6
Medium (32%)
2
Easy (11%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only3 (16%)
§101 + other2 (11%)
§103 only5 (26%)
§102 only1 (5%)
§112 only2 (11%)
Multi-statute (no §101)6 (32%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
1
Information Tech
5% of docket
2
Communications
11% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
6
Mechanical / Eng
32% of docket
10
Business / Other
53% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

190 h
Manual time on pending OAs
38 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
66 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
TRIEU, VAN THANH 1 84.5% +13.8%
HOLWERDA, STEPHEN 1 73.2% +19.8%
EASTMAN, AARON ROBERT 1 79.2% +19.1%
AZIZ, ADNAN 1 76.7% +35.0%
KEATON, SHERROD L 1 53.3% +35.7%
ELCHANTI, ZEINA 1 64.3% +25.0%
CHEN, SIBIN 1 86.6% +5.2%
MILLER, ALAN S 1 70.6% +26.6%
BIEGER, VIRGINIA RUTH 1 42.9% +15.8%
ABOUZAHRA, MAHMOUD KAMAL 1 68.9% +2.7%

Quick Wins (2)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19206509 VEHICLE ANTI-THEFT DEVICE AND METHOD THEREFOR TRIEU, VAN THANH —
18759833 CHARGE BASED SWITCHED MATRIX AND METHOD THEREFOR CHEN, SIBIN —

Hard Cases (11)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17748285 GROUND WORKING APPARATUS MITCHELL, JOEL F 51d overdue
18581829 PREDICTING TAKEOVERS ACROSS MOBILITIES FOR FUTURE PERSONALIZED MOBILITY SERVICES GUILIANO, CHARLES A 12d
19002183 UNDERSTANDING ROBOTIC TOUCH PARAMETERS THROUGH PARTICIPATORY EXPERIMENTS OF PHYSICAL HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTIONS HOLWERDA, STEPHEN —
18940059 AIR MATTRESS ASSEMBLY AND METHOD THEREFOR EASTMAN, AARON ROBERT —
18924329 AUTOMOTIVE PLUG-IN FOR A COMPUTER DESIGN PROGRAM FOR A COMPUTER NUMERICAL CONTROL (CNC) MACHINE AZIZ, ADNAN —
18759840 CHARGE BASED SWITCHED MATRIX AND METHOD THEREFOR ELCHANTI, ZEINA —
18733032 ROLLING PAPER FILTER TIP HAVING A FLAVOR POD HOLDER BIEGER, VIRGINIA RUTH —
18618010 LIDARGRID A 3D OPACITY GRID FROM LIDAR FOR SCENE FORECASTING BALI, VIKKRAM —

Interview Candidates (8)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19206509 VEHICLE ANTI-THEFT DEVICE AND METHOD THEREFOR TRIEU, VAN THANH —
19002183 UNDERSTANDING ROBOTIC TOUCH PARAMETERS THROUGH PARTICIPATORY EXPERIMENTS OF PHYSICAL HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTIONS HOLWERDA, STEPHEN —
18940059 AIR MATTRESS ASSEMBLY AND METHOD THEREFOR EASTMAN, AARON ROBERT —
18924329 AUTOMOTIVE PLUG-IN FOR A COMPUTER DESIGN PROGRAM FOR A COMPUTER NUMERICAL CONTROL (CNC) MACHINE AZIZ, ADNAN —
18759838 CHARGE BASED SWITCHED MATRIX AND METHOD THEREFOR KEATON, SHERROD L —
18759840 CHARGE BASED SWITCHED MATRIX AND METHOD THEREFOR ELCHANTI, ZEINA —
18759464 CHARGE BASED SWITCHED MATRIX AND METHOD THEREFOR MILLER, ALAN S —
18733032 ROLLING PAPER FILTER TIP HAVING A FLAVOR POD HOLDER BIEGER, VIRGINIA RUTH —

Client Portfolio (9 clients)

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
36561
36731
26851
24861
41001
36231
26751
36681
37611
36711

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19206509 VEHICLE ANTI-THEFT DEVICE AND METHOD THEREFOR Keyfree Technologies Inc. TRIEU, VAN THANH §103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 13, 2025
19002183 UNDERSTANDING ROBOTIC TOUCH PARAMETERS THROUGH PARTICIPATORY EXPERIMENTS OF PHYSICAL HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTIONS Honda Motor Co., Ltd. HOLWERDA, STEPHEN 3656 §101§102§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 26, 2024
18940059 AIR MATTRESS ASSEMBLY AND METHOD THEREFOR Star W Professional Services LLC EASTMAN, AARON ROBERT 3673 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 07, 2024
18924329 AUTOMOTIVE PLUG-IN FOR A COMPUTER DESIGN PROGRAM FOR A COMPUTER NUMERICAL CONTROL (CNC) MACHINE Honda Motor Co., Ltd. AZIZ, ADNAN 2685 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 23, 2024
18759838 CHARGE BASED SWITCHED MATRIX AND METHOD THEREFOR Aistorm Inc. KEATON, SHERROD L §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 29, 2024
18759840 CHARGE BASED SWITCHED MATRIX AND METHOD THEREFOR Aistorm Inc. ELCHANTI, ZEINA §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 29, 2024
18759833 CHARGE BASED SWITCHED MATRIX AND METHOD THEREFOR Aistorm Inc. CHEN, SIBIN §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 29, 2024
18759464 CHARGE BASED SWITCHED MATRIX AND METHOD THEREFOR Aistorm Inc. MILLER, ALAN S §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 28, 2024
18733032 ROLLING PAPER FILTER TIP HAVING A FLAVOR POD HOLDER Abellio Ltd. BIEGER, VIRGINIA RUTH §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 04, 2024
18669706 SYSTEM AND METHOD USING REASONING FOR VIDEO ANOMALY DETECTION WITH LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS Honda Motor Co., Ltd. ABOUZAHRA, MAHMOUD KAMAL 2486 §103 Final Rejection 51d overdue Pending May 21, 2024
18659373 PACKING DEVICE FOR SMOKING CONES Bbk Tobacco & Foods, LLP LE, TOBEY CHOU §103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 09, 2024
18618010 LIDARGRID A 3D OPACITY GRID FROM LIDAR FOR SCENE FORECASTING Honda Motor Co., Ltd. BALI, VIKKRAM §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 27, 2024
18601434 COLLAPSIBLE SHIELDING DEVICE FOR SMOKING ARTICLES AND METHOD THEREFOR Bbk Tobacco & Foods, LLP PAUDEL, PRADEEP 4100 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 11, 2024
18583149 SYSTEM AND METHOD TRANSFORMING VISUAL COMMONSENSE REASONING AS COMMONSENSE REASONING AND VISUAL RECOGNITION WITH LARGE LANGUAGE MODELS Honda Motor Co., Ltd. SPIELER, WILLIAM §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 21, 2024
18581829 PREDICTING TAKEOVERS ACROSS MOBILITIES FOR FUTURE PERSONALIZED MOBILITY SERVICES Honda Motor Co., Ltd. GUILIANO, CHARLES A 3623 §101 Final Rejection 12d Pending Feb 20, 2024
18539590 OBJECT-CENTRIC VIDEO REPRESENTATION FOR ACTION PREDICTION Brown University NASHER, AHMED ABDULLALIM-M 2675 §103 Final Rejection 14d Pending Dec 14, 2023
18386319 MULTI-PROFILE QUADRATIC PROGRAMMING (MPQP) FOR OPTIMAL GAP SELECTION AND SPEED PLANNING OF AUTONOMOUS DRIVING Honda Motor Co., Ltd. SCHNEIDER, PAULA LYNN 3668 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 02, 2023
18241955 COCONUT DRILLING, TAPPING, AND FLAVORING DEVICE AND METHOD THEREFOR Monarch Media ROSARIO-APONTE, ALBA T 3761 §102§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 04, 2023
17748285 GROUND WORKING APPARATUS Ruts Plus Limited MITCHELL, JOEL F 3671 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 51d overdue Pending May 19, 2022

Managing Weiss & Moy, P.C.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month