Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Yee & Associates, P.C.

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

19 pending office actions • 1 client • 19 examiners • 12 art units • 0 of 19 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

YEE AND ASSOCIATES, P.C. focuses on Computing & Software, with 342 career applications. The firm currently has 19 pending office actions. It has a resolved allowance rate of 43.62 percent, which is a notably low figure compared to other firms in this sector. The firm averages 6.42 office actions per allowance, suggesting an extremely intensive and prolonged prosecution process.

This high average of 6.42 indicates that the firm engages in many rounds of communication with examiners, yet the 43.62 percent allowance rate shows that these efforts often do not result in a grant. For clients with 342 career applications, these metrics highlight the significant challenges the firm faces in securing software patents. Practitioners can view the 19 pending office actions as a sign of ongoing efforts to navigate this difficult landscape. The combination of a 43.62 percent allowance rate and an average of 6.42 office actions per allowance across 342 career applications reflects a prosecution environment where success is difficult to achieve despite extensive and persistent interactions with the USPTO in the Computing & Software technology area.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Quality Metrics (n=342 apps, methodology: how we score firms)

43.6%
Allowance Rate
n=342
-0.09σ
Allowance Rate (norm)
n=342
6.4
OAs to Allowance
n=106
+0.57σ
OAs to Allow (norm)
n=106
1607 days
Time to Allowance
n=106
+1.8pp
Interview Lift
n=342
49.8%
RCE Rate
n=342
13.2%
Appeal Rate
n=342

Rejection Performance (% of received rejections ultimately overcome)

38.4%
§101 Overcome
n=177
41.8%
§102 Overcome
n=110
35.7%
§103 Overcome
n=255
40.3%
§112 Overcome
n=119

Specialization & Scale

G06F, G06Q, H04L
Top CPC Subclasses
65%
Top-3 CPC Share
n=342
1
Practitioners
n=342
342.0
Apps / Practitioner
n=342

Portfolio Summary

19
Total Pending OAs
8
Non-Final OAs
6
Final Rejections
5
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

10
Hard (53%)
9
Medium (47%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only5 (26%)
§101 + other2 (11%)
§103 only8 (42%)
§102 only1 (5%)
Multi-statute (no §101)3 (16%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
9
Information Tech
47% of docket
1
Communications
5% of docket
2
Semiconductors
11% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
16% of docket
4
Business / Other
21% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

190 h
Manual time on pending OAs
38 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
66 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.7 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
IQBAL, MUSTAFA 1 46.7% +25.8%
NEURAUTER JR, GEORGE C 1 76.4% +10.7%
KING, DANIEL JOHN 1 98.5% +2.1%
KOETH, MICHELLE M 1 76.7% +16.5%
MALIK, ZEERICK ASIM 1 — —
WHEATON, BRADFORD F 1 61.5% +11.2%
PHANTANA ANGKOOL, DAVID 1 86.3% +13.8%
SUN, ANDREW NMN 1 50.0% +100.0%
DETERDING, GWYNEVERE AMELIA 1 71.4% +35.7%
JOHNSON, TODD JEFFREY 1 — —

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18768474 Increasing Visibility of Similar Designators PHANTANA ANGKOOL, DAVID —

Hard Cases (10)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17037816 ENTITY INFORMATION ENRICHMENT FOR COMPANY DETERMINATIONS TRIEU, EM N 16d
19023183 Managing Workflow Instance Execution using a Workflow Sentinel IQBAL, MUSTAFA —
18964972 Vertically Stacked 8T Complementary FET SRAM KING, DANIEL JOHN —
18826280 SIMPLIFYING CONDITIONAL STRUCTURES FOR LOOP OPTIMIZATION MALIK, ZEERICK ASIM —
18636481 METHOD OF TRAINING MACHINE LEARING MODEL FOR MANAGING PROMPTS DETERDING, GWYNEVERE AMELIA —
18362726 Artificial Intelligence Model Factory ALI, NAYMUR RAHMAN —
18317475 New Data Class Generation Based on Static Reference Data NGUYEN, CAM LINH T —
18183248 Multivariate Skill Demand Forecasting System KOESTER, MICHAEL RICHARD —

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19023183 Managing Workflow Instance Execution using a Workflow Sentinel IQBAL, MUSTAFA —
19009249 SCHEDULING EVENTS IN A VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT NEURAUTER JR, GEORGE C —
18828278 Object Abstraction in Smart Vehicles to Balance Vehicle Functionality with Confidentiality Preservation KOETH, MICHELLE M —
18790258 OPTIMIZING DISRUPTIVE UPDATES FOR SINGLE NODE DEPLOYMENTS IN AN ORCHESTRATION PLATFORM WHEATON, BRADFORD F —
18768474 Increasing Visibility of Similar Designators PHANTANA ANGKOOL, DAVID —
18651801 Correlating Local Resolvers to Clients SUN, ANDREW NMN —
18636481 METHOD OF TRAINING MACHINE LEARING MODEL FOR MANAGING PROMPTS DETERDING, GWYNEVERE AMELIA —

Client Portfolio (1 client)

Client (Assignee)Pending OAs
IBM 19

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
21933
36242
36251
24591
28271
26711
21721
21231
21971
21961

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleClientExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19023183 Managing Workflow Instance Execution using a Workflow Sentinel International Business Machines Corporation IQBAL, MUSTAFA 3625 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 15, 2025
19009249 SCHEDULING EVENTS IN A VIRTUAL ENVIRONMENT International Business Machines Corporation NEURAUTER JR, GEORGE C 2459 §102 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 03, 2025
18964972 Vertically Stacked 8T Complementary FET SRAM International Business Machines Corporation KING, DANIEL JOHN 2827 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 02, 2024
18828278 Object Abstraction in Smart Vehicles to Balance Vehicle Functionality with Confidentiality Preservation International Business Machines Corporation KOETH, MICHELLE M 2671 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Sep 09, 2024
18826280 SIMPLIFYING CONDITIONAL STRUCTURES FOR LOOP OPTIMIZATION International Business Machines Corporation MALIK, ZEERICK ASIM 2193 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 06, 2024
18790258 OPTIMIZING DISRUPTIVE UPDATES FOR SINGLE NODE DEPLOYMENTS IN AN ORCHESTRATION PLATFORM International Business Machines Corporation WHEATON, BRADFORD F 2193 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 31, 2024
18768474 Increasing Visibility of Similar Designators International Business Machines Corporation PHANTANA ANGKOOL, DAVID 2172 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 10, 2024
18651801 Correlating Local Resolvers to Clients International Business Machines Corporation SUN, ANDREW NMN §103 Final Rejection — Pending May 01, 2024
18636481 METHOD OF TRAINING MACHINE LEARING MODEL FOR MANAGING PROMPTS International Business Machines Corporation DETERDING, GWYNEVERE AMELIA §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Apr 16, 2024
18615123 Hypervisor-Directed Central Processing Unit Utilization International Business Machines Corporation JOHNSON, TODD JEFFREY §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 25, 2024
18475510 Log Storage System with Improved Utilization of Storage Space International Business Machines Corporation WOOD, WILLIAM C 2193 §103 Non-Final OA 71d Pending Sep 27, 2023
18362726 Artificial Intelligence Model Factory International Business Machines Corporation ALI, NAYMUR RAHMAN 2123 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 31, 2023
18317475 New Data Class Generation Based on Static Reference Data International Business Machines Corporation NGUYEN, CAM LINH T §101 Final Rejection — Pending May 15, 2023
18183248 Multivariate Skill Demand Forecasting System International Business Machines Corporation KOESTER, MICHAEL RICHARD 3624 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 14, 2023
18177831 Storage Assignment Using Application Storage Requirements International Business Machines Corporation HEADLY, MELISSA A 2197 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 03, 2023
17935199 Dynamic Control of Message Expiry by Messaging Middleware International Business Machines Corporation BLAIR, APRIL YING SHAN 2196 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 26, 2022
17655040 TIME-CONSISTENT RISK-SENSITIVE DECISION-MAKING WITH PROBABILISTIC DISCOUNT International Business Machines Corporation SCHEUNEMANN, RICHARD N 3624 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 16, 2022
17148412 Information Matching Using Subgraphs International Business Machines Corporation KIM, TAELOR 2859 §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 13, 2021
17037816 ENTITY INFORMATION ENRICHMENT FOR COMPANY DETERMINATIONS International Business Machines Corporation TRIEU, EM N 2128 §103§112 Non-Final OA 16d Pending Sep 30, 2020

Managing Yee & Associates, P.C.'s Patent Prosecution?

IP Author helps law firms respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month