Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

Citibank, N.A.

Technology areas: Computing & Software • Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems

22 pending office actions • 15 art units • 21 examiners • 0 of 22 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 159 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Citibank, N.A. currently manages 26 pending office actions within the Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems technology area. These 26 actions are distributed across 24 distinct examiners, which indicates a high degree of individual examiner variety relative to the total volume of pending matters. The 16 distinct art units involved indicate that the company's intellectual property spans multiple specialized examination groups, requiring a strategy that accounts for diverse procedural nuances within the patent office.

Among the active personnel, Tokuta, Shean S is identified as the busiest examiner, currently overseeing 2 of the pending office actions. This specific concentration of 2 actions with one individual contrasts with the broader distribution across the 24 distinct examiners assigned to the portfolio. For a practitioner, the presence of 26 pending office actions across 16 distinct art units necessitates a versatile approach to prosecution, as each unit may apply different interpretations of Transportation, E-Commerce & Mechanical Systems guidelines.

The fact that 24 distinct examiners are handling 26 pending office actions implies that most examiners are only managing a single case for this entity. This lack of examiner overlap, with the exception of Tokuta, Shean S and his 2 pending actions, means that institutional knowledge gained from one prosecution may not frequently carry over to others. Consequently, the 26 pending office actions represent a landscape where individual examiner preferences will likely dictate the pace and outcome of the majority of the applications.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

22
Total Pending OAs
12
Non-Final OAs
10
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
4
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 6 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (1)Due ≤ 30 days (4)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

15
Hard (68%)
6
Medium (27%)
1
Easy (5%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only6 (27%)
§101 + other5 (23%)
§103 only5 (23%)
§102 only1 (5%)
Double-patenting only1 (5%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (18%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
10
Information Tech
45% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
8
Mechanical / Eng
36% of docket
4
Business / Other
18% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

220 h
Manual time on pending OAs
44 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
77 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.9 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
GARCIA MIZE, KARLYANNIE MARIE 2 35.4% +30.4%
TOKUTA, SHEAN S 1 79.7% +16.2%
COLE, BRANDON S 1 79.2% +7.5%
KRAISINGER, EMILY MARIE 1 31.8% +46.0%
STORK, KYLE R 1 63.2% +28.7%
BROPHY, MATTHEW J 1 68.5% +34.3%
KANAAN, TONY P 1 28.7% +27.9%
ROBINSON, GRETA LEE 1 80.5% +17.0%
COLAN, GIOVANNA B 1 72.5% +29.1%
OUELLETTE, JONATHAN P 1 66.4% +29.5%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19248449 ACCESSING SILOED DATA ACROSS DISPARATE LOCATIONS VIA A UNIFIED METADATA GRAPH SYSTEMS AND METHODS ROBINSON, GRETA LEE —

Hard Cases (15)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18661366 DISTRIBUTED DATABASE METHODS AND SYSTEMS IMMANUEL, ILSE I 32d overdue
18771248 ACCOUNT PROGRAM SYSTEMS AND METHODS DAGNEW, SABA 26d
18443725 HYBRID MACHINE LEARNING SYSTEM FOR EFFICIENT OPERATION REVIEW WITH ANOMALY DETECTION, ADAPTIVE CONFIDENCE SCORING, AND MULTI-LAYERED CONTEXTUAL RISK SCORING TRIEU, EM N 27d
18787544 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SECURELY SHARING PUBLIC BLOCKCHAIN ADDRESSES SHAHABI, ARI ARASTOO 28d
19328023 RESOURCE UTILIZATION ESTIMATION AND ALLOCATION FOR MULTI-AGENT COMPUTATIONAL SYSTEMS BROPHY, MATTHEW J 54d
19574179 MANAGING DIGITAL ARTIFACT ACCESS USING AGENTIC ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE MODELS TOKUTA, SHEAN S —
19557626 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CROSS-COMPUTING ARCHITECTURE TRANSFER MESSAGE TRANSLATION GARCIA MIZE, KARLYANNIE MARIE —
19458425 DYNAMIC ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AGENT ORCHESTRATION USING A LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL GATEWAY ROUTER COLE, BRANDON S —

Interview Candidates (10)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19247219 GENERATING INSIGHTS FOR SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS COLAN, GIOVANNA B 26d
19328023 RESOURCE UTILIZATION ESTIMATION AND ALLOCATION FOR MULTI-AGENT COMPUTATIONAL SYSTEMS BROPHY, MATTHEW J 54d
19574179 MANAGING DIGITAL ARTIFACT ACCESS USING AGENTIC ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE MODELS TOKUTA, SHEAN S —
19557626 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CROSS-COMPUTING ARCHITECTURE TRANSFER MESSAGE TRANSLATION GARCIA MIZE, KARLYANNIE MARIE —
19460108 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SEAMLESSLY PROCESSING TRANSACTIONS USING DISTRIBUTED LEDGER TECHNOLOGY IN A LEGACY SYSTEM INFRASTRUCTURE GARCIA MIZE, KARLYANNIE MARIE —
19418868 ROBUST ARTIFACTS MAPPING AND AUTHORIZATION SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OPERATING THE SAME KRAISINGER, EMILY MARIE —
19376612 DOMAIN-SPECIFIC NATURAL LANGUAGE DATA GENERATION BASED ON ITERATIVE VALIDATION OF DOMAIN-SPECIFIC ONTOLOGICAL DATA STORK, KYLE R —
19279965 AUTHORIZATION FLOW MANAGEMENT SYSTEM KANAAN, TONY P —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2128 3
3698 2
2419 1
3626 1
2191 1
3696 1
2163 1
2165 1
3629 1
2197 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19574179 MANAGING DIGITAL ARTIFACT ACCESS USING AGENTIC ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE MODELS TOKUTA, SHEAN S 2419 §103§112 Final Rejection — Pending Mar 20, 2026
19557626 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CROSS-COMPUTING ARCHITECTURE TRANSFER MESSAGE TRANSLATION GARCIA MIZE, KARLYANNIE MARIE 3698 §101§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Mar 05, 2026
19460108 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SEAMLESSLY PROCESSING TRANSACTIONS USING DISTRIBUTED LEDGER TECHNOLOGY IN A LEGACY SYSTEM INFRASTRUCTURE GARCIA MIZE, KARLYANNIE MARIE 3698 §103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 26, 2026
19458425 DYNAMIC ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AGENT ORCHESTRATION USING A LARGE LANGUAGE MODEL GATEWAY ROUTER COLE, BRANDON S 2128 §101 Final Rejection — Pending Jan 23, 2026
19418868 ROBUST ARTIFACTS MAPPING AND AUTHORIZATION SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR OPERATING THE SAME KRAISINGER, EMILY MARIE 3626 §101Other Final Rejection — Pending Dec 12, 2025
19376612 DOMAIN-SPECIFIC NATURAL LANGUAGE DATA GENERATION BASED ON ITERATIVE VALIDATION OF DOMAIN-SPECIFIC ONTOLOGICAL DATA STORK, KYLE R 2128 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Oct 31, 2025
19328023 RESOURCE UTILIZATION ESTIMATION AND ALLOCATION FOR MULTI-AGENT COMPUTATIONAL SYSTEMS BROPHY, MATTHEW J 2191 §103§112Other Non-Final OA 54d Pending Sep 12, 2025
19279965 AUTHORIZATION FLOW MANAGEMENT SYSTEM KANAAN, TONY P 3696 §101§103 Final Rejection — Pending Jul 24, 2025
19248449 ACCESSING SILOED DATA ACROSS DISPARATE LOCATIONS VIA A UNIFIED METADATA GRAPH SYSTEMS AND METHODS ROBINSON, GRETA LEE 2163 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 24, 2025
19247219 GENERATING INSIGHTS FOR SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS COLAN, GIOVANNA B 2165 §103 Final Rejection 26d Pending Jun 24, 2025
19061724 MANAGEMENT AND PRESENTATION OF SYSTEM CONTROL DATA STREAMS OUELLETTE, JONATHAN P 3629 §102Other Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 24, 2025
19049951 END-TO-END MEASUREMENT, GRADING AND EVALUATION OF PRETRAINED ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE MODELS VIA A GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE (GUI) SYSTEMS AND METHODS GUNDRY, STEPHEN T — §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 10, 2025
19036857 CORE DECISION ENGINE FOR MANAGING SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT LIFECYCLES HUSSAIN, IMAD — §103§112Other Non-Final OA — Pending Jan 24, 2025
18940535 USING MACHINE LEARNING TO PREDICT TESTS ASSOCIATED WITH APPLICATION PROGRAMMING INTERFACE UPDATES PAULINO, LENIN 2197 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Nov 07, 2024
18919278 AGGREGATED AUTHORIZATION TOKEN CHIANG, JASON 2431 §103Other Final Rejection — Pending Oct 17, 2024
18892338 FACILITATING UPDATES TO DATA PIPELINES USING MODULARLY-GENERATED PLATFORM-AGNOSTIC DATA PIPELINE PORTIONS SYSTEMS AND METHODS LEE, MARINA — §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 21, 2024
18818461 METHODS AND SYSTEMS FOR INTERACTIVE DATA INPUT RODRIGUEZ, DANIEL 2178 §101§103Other Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 28, 2024
18787544 SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR SECURELY SHARING PUBLIC BLOCKCHAIN ADDRESSES SHAHABI, ARI ARASTOO 3697 §101 Final Rejection 28d Pending Jul 29, 2024
18771248 ACCOUNT PROGRAM SYSTEMS AND METHODS DAGNEW, SABA 3621 §101Other Final Rejection 26d Pending Jul 12, 2024
18661366 DISTRIBUTED DATABASE METHODS AND SYSTEMS IMMANUEL, ILSE I 3699 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA 32d overdue Pending May 10, 2024
18443725 HYBRID MACHINE LEARNING SYSTEM FOR EFFICIENT OPERATION REVIEW WITH ANOMALY DETECTION, ADAPTIVE CONFIDENCE SCORING, AND MULTI-LAYERED CONTEXTUAL RISK SCORING TRIEU, EM N 2128 §101§103 Final Rejection 27d Pending Feb 16, 2024
18682785 READY TO USE COMPOSITIONS OF CETRORELIX ACETATE ALDARONDO, DASIA ALI — §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 09, 2024

Managing Citibank, N.A.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month