Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 02, 2026

CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC.

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

11 pending office actions • 9 art units • 11 examiners • 0 of 11 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 10 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC. is currently managing 9 pending office actions within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These 9 pending office actions are spread across 7 distinct art units, which indicates that the company's chemical and material innovations are being reviewed by several different specialized groups. The involvement of 7 distinct art units suggests a diverse portfolio that touches on various aspects of chemistry, requiring practitioners to be familiar with multiple sets of examination guidelines. This distribution reflects a broad technical reach within the sector.

The prosecution of these 9 pending office actions involves 9 distinct examiners. This one-to-one relationship between the number of actions and the number of examiners means that each pending matter is being evaluated by a unique individual. SWIER, WAYNE K. is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently responsible for 1 pending office action. In a portfolio where 9 distinct examiners each handle a pending action, the influence of any single examiner is limited. This fragmented examiner pool requires a highly individualized strategy for each application.

For a patent practitioner, the distribution of the 9 pending office actions across the distinct art units and examiners requires a highly customized approach for each case. Since SWIER, WAYNE K. handles 1 pending office action and the other examiners handle the rest, there is no central examiner to focus on. The pending office actions represent a significant active workload within the Chemistry & Materials sector, necessitating careful coordination across the 7 distinct art units. Success depends on maintaining technical consistency while navigating nine different examiner perspectives.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

11
Total Pending OAs
8
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
2
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
0
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 60 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (45%)
6
Medium (55%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 only1 (9%)
§103 only5 (45%)
§102 only1 (9%)
Multi-statute (no §101)4 (36%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

8
Life Sciences
73% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
1
Mechanical / Eng
9% of docket
2
Business / Other
18% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

110 h
Manual time on pending OAs
22 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
38 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.0 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
SWIER, WAYNE K. 1 67.6% +19.6%
SHAH, SAMIR 1 36.4% +34.9%
TROCHE, EDGAREDMANUE 1 57.8% +35.0%
MACKEY, PATRICK HEWEY 1 83.6% +12.4%
KRUER, KEVIN R 1 26.8% +29.4%
YE, XINWEN 1 43.4% +44.0%
QIAO, HUIHONG 1 71.2% +25.0%
BERRO, ADAM JOSEPH 1 51.8% +45.2%
LU, HAOTIAN 1 60.6% +37.3%
MATZEK, MATTHEW D 1 46.3% +36.8%

Hard Cases (5)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18821813 SELF-RELEASING, UV BLOCKING SURFACING MATERIALS FOR COMPOSITE PARTS SHAH, SAMIR —
18726075 POLYMER COMPOSITIONS HAVING DENSIFICATION ACCELERATORS AND ROTATIONAL MOLDING PROCESSES FOR MAKING HOLLOW ARTICLES THEREFROM TROCHE, EDGAREDMANUE —
18719734 MINERAL FLOTATION SEPARATION MACKEY, PATRICK HEWEY —
18569154 COMPOSITE FILMS FOR MOBILE ELECTRONIC DEVICE COMPONENTS KRUER, KEVIN R —
18549052 A PROCESS FOR PRODUCING POLYMER FIBER AND POLYMER FIBER MADE THEREFROM YE, XINWEN —

Interview Candidates (10)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 8 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18257864 COMPOSITE TUBING LU, HAOTIAN 49d overdue
18009678 FIBER REINFORCED THERMOPLASTIC MATRIX COMPOSITE MATERIAL MATZEK, MATTHEW D 46d overdue
18258178 RAPID-CURING RESIN COMPOSITION AND COMPOSITE MATERIAL CONTAINING THE SAME BERRO, ADAM JOSEPH 10d overdue
18864580 COMPOSITE SANDWICH STRUCTURE AND METHOD OF MAKING THE SAME SWIER, WAYNE K. 34d
18821813 SELF-RELEASING, UV BLOCKING SURFACING MATERIALS FOR COMPOSITE PARTS SHAH, SAMIR —
18726075 POLYMER COMPOSITIONS HAVING DENSIFICATION ACCELERATORS AND ROTATIONAL MOLDING PROCESSES FOR MAKING HOLLOW ARTICLES THEREFROM TROCHE, EDGAREDMANUE —
18719734 MINERAL FLOTATION SEPARATION MACKEY, PATRICK HEWEY —
18569154 COMPOSITE FILMS FOR MOBILE ELECTRONIC DEVICE COMPONENTS KRUER, KEVIN R —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1748 1
1744 1
1787 1
1738 1
1763 1
1765 1
3753 1
1786 1
1762 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18864580 COMPOSITE SANDWICH STRUCTURE AND METHOD OF MAKING THE SAME SWIER, WAYNE K. 1748 §103 Non-Final OA 34d Pending Nov 11, 2024
18821813 SELF-RELEASING, UV BLOCKING SURFACING MATERIALS FOR COMPOSITE PARTS SHAH, SAMIR — §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Aug 30, 2024
18726075 POLYMER COMPOSITIONS HAVING DENSIFICATION ACCELERATORS AND ROTATIONAL MOLDING PROCESSES FOR MAKING HOLLOW ARTICLES THEREFROM TROCHE, EDGAREDMANUE 1744 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 01, 2024
18719734 MINERAL FLOTATION SEPARATION MACKEY, PATRICK HEWEY — §101 Non-Final OA — Pending Jun 13, 2024
18569154 COMPOSITE FILMS FOR MOBILE ELECTRONIC DEVICE COMPONENTS KRUER, KEVIN R 1787 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 11, 2023
18549052 A PROCESS FOR PRODUCING POLYMER FIBER AND POLYMER FIBER MADE THEREFROM YE, XINWEN 1738 §103§112 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 05, 2023
18548871 THERMOPLASTIC POLYAMIDE PARTICLES FOR TOUGHENING COMPOSITE MATERIALS QIAO, HUIHONG 1763 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Sep 01, 2023
18258178 RAPID-CURING RESIN COMPOSITION AND COMPOSITE MATERIAL CONTAINING THE SAME BERRO, ADAM JOSEPH 1765 §103 Final Rejection 10d overdue Pending Jun 16, 2023
18257864 COMPOSITE TUBING LU, HAOTIAN 3753 §103 Non-Final OA 49d overdue Pending Jun 15, 2023
18009678 FIBER REINFORCED THERMOPLASTIC MATRIX COMPOSITE MATERIAL MATZEK, MATTHEW D 1786 §103 Non-Final OA 46d overdue Pending Dec 09, 2022
17849614 COMPOSITIONS AND METHODS FOR PROTECTING COATINGS FROM THE DELETERIOUS EFFECTS OF EXPOSURE TO UV-C LIGHT EGWIM, KELECHI CHIDI 1762 §102 Non-Final OA 85d Pending Jun 25, 2022

Managing CYTEC INDUSTRIES INC.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month