Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
Technology areas: Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics • Medical Devices & Mechanical Engineering
3 pending office actions • 3 art units • 3 examiners • 0 of 3 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 19 patents granted in the last 365 days
Garuda Technology Co. Ltd. currently has 3 pending office actions within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. These actions are distributed across distinct examiners and art units, showing a diversified prosecution landscape. SHARMA, ADITYA is the busiest examiner for the company, currently handling 1 pending office action.
The distribution of 3 pending office actions across the various art units indicates that the company's filings cover several different technical niches. Because each examiner is responsible for only a portion of the workload, the company must manage separate examination tracks. This variety in the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics area requires a flexible legal strategy to address the unique feedback from each examiner.
Practitioners should be aware that with multiple examiners involved, the prosecution of the matters may follow different timelines. The spread across the art units suggests that the company's innovations are being reviewed by multiple specialized groups. Maintaining a cohesive strategy across these 3 pending matters is essential for protecting the company's intellectual property.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (33%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (67%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| SHARMA, ADITYA | 1 | 79.5% | +28.1% |
| DUNLAP, JONATHAN M | 1 | 76.2% | +17.0% |
| FREAL, JOHN BRENDAN | 1 | 93.1% | +8.7% |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18383711 | SENSING MODULE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME | DUNLAP, JONATHAN M | — |
| 18457784 | CIRCUIT BOARD AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF | FREAL, JOHN BRENDAN | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18645131 | TRANSDUCER CIRCUIT BOARD AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME | SHARMA, ADITYA | — |
| 18383711 | SENSING MODULE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME | DUNLAP, JONATHAN M | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2847 | 1 |
| 2855 | 1 |
| 3729 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18645131 | TRANSDUCER CIRCUIT BOARD AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME | SHARMA, ADITYA | 2847 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Apr 24, 2024 |
| 18383711 | SENSING MODULE AND METHOD OF MANUFACTURING THE SAME | DUNLAP, JONATHAN M | 2855 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Oct 25, 2023 |
| 18457784 | CIRCUIT BOARD AND MANUFACTURING METHOD THEREOF | FREAL, JOHN BRENDAN | 3729 | §102§103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 29, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial