Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 15, 2026

GC Corporation

11 pending office actions • 6 art units • 11 examiners • 0 of 11 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 15 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

11
Total Pending OAs
6
Non-Final OAs
5
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

3
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
1
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 5 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (3)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due later (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

5
Hard (45%)
6
Medium (55%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only4 (36%)
§102 only2 (18%)
Multi-statute (no §101)5 (45%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

3
Life Sciences
27% of docket
1
Information Tech
9% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
3
Mechanical / Eng
27% of docket
4
Business / Other
36% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

110 h
Manual time on pending OAs
22 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
38 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.0 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
TO, HOLLY T 1 48.7% +33.9%
NGUYEN, TRI V 1 67.4% +57.7%
KHALID, OMER 1 66.8% +23.4%
AZUBUOGU, CHIEMERIE CHIBUZOR 1 0.0% +0.0%
NGUYEN, LEON VIET Q 1 85.3% +9.9%
TRAN, SUSAN T 1 62.6% +35.7%
BECKHARDT, LYNDSEY MARIE 1 27.9% +48.0%
SALAMON, PETER A 1 86.4% +5.5%
ANTHONY, JOSEPH DAVID 1 73.1% +4.7%
BOYD, JENNIFER A 1 32.5% +44.7%

Quick Wins (1)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18694157 BASE PASTE AND DENTAL ALGINATE IMPRESSION MATERIAL SALAMON, PETER A

Hard Cases (7)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18696555 DENTAL COMPOSITION BECKHARDT, LYNDSEY MARIE 28d overdue
17908408 MEDICAL HONEYCOMB STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING THE SAME, MEDICAL TISSUE RECONSTRUCTION BAG, AND MOLDING DIE BLANCO, JAVIER G 10d overdue
18356582 DENTAL SEPARATION MATERIAL ANTHONY, JOSEPH DAVID 9d overdue
18852233 GROUP OF ARTIFICIAL TEETH TO, HOLLY T 16d
18846316 GROUP OF ARTIFICIAL TEETH AZUBUOGU, CHIEMERIE CHIBUZOR 86d
18848273 METHOD FOR PRODUCING TREATED-SILICA DISPERSED MONOMER COMPOSITION NGUYEN, TRI V
18846030 METHOD OF PREDICTING CHARACTERISTIC VALUE OF MATERIAL, METHOD OF GENERATING TRAINED MODEL, PROGRAM, AND DEVICE NGUYEN, LEON VIET Q

Interview Candidates (6)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18696555 DENTAL COMPOSITION BECKHARDT, LYNDSEY MARIE 28d overdue
18852233 GROUP OF ARTIFICIAL TEETH TO, HOLLY T 16d
18848273 METHOD FOR PRODUCING TREATED-SILICA DISPERSED MONOMER COMPOSITION NGUYEN, TRI V
18846348 INTRAORAL REPORTING DEVICE, AND INTRAORAL MEDICAL DEVICE KHALID, OMER
18787076 COMPOSITION FOR DENTIFRICE TRAN, SUSAN T
18067996 GLASS POWDER COMPOSITE, AND METHOD OF PRODUCING GLASS POWDER COMPOSITE BOYD, JENNIFER A

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
3772 2
2422 1
1613 1
1764 1
1786 1
3774 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18852233 GROUP OF ARTIFICIAL TEETH TO, HOLLY T 3772 §103§112 Non-Final OA 16d Pending Sep 27, 2024
18848273 METHOD FOR PRODUCING TREATED-SILICA DISPERSED MONOMER COMPOSITION NGUYEN, TRI V §102§103 Non-Final OA Pending Sep 18, 2024
18846348 INTRAORAL REPORTING DEVICE, AND INTRAORAL MEDICAL DEVICE KHALID, OMER 2422 §103 Final Rejection Pending Sep 12, 2024
18846316 GROUP OF ARTIFICIAL TEETH AZUBUOGU, CHIEMERIE CHIBUZOR 3772 §103 Final Rejection 86d Pending Sep 12, 2024
18846030 METHOD OF PREDICTING CHARACTERISTIC VALUE OF MATERIAL, METHOD OF GENERATING TRAINED MODEL, PROGRAM, AND DEVICE NGUYEN, LEON VIET Q §102§103§112 Non-Final OA Pending Sep 11, 2024
18787076 COMPOSITION FOR DENTIFRICE TRAN, SUSAN T §102 Non-Final OA Pending Jul 29, 2024
18696555 DENTAL COMPOSITION BECKHARDT, LYNDSEY MARIE 1613 §103 Final Rejection 28d overdue Pending Mar 28, 2024
18694157 BASE PASTE AND DENTAL ALGINATE IMPRESSION MATERIAL SALAMON, PETER A §102 Non-Final OA Pending Mar 21, 2024
18356582 DENTAL SEPARATION MATERIAL ANTHONY, JOSEPH DAVID 1764 §102§112 Final Rejection 9d overdue Pending Jul 21, 2023
18067996 GLASS POWDER COMPOSITE, AND METHOD OF PRODUCING GLASS POWDER COMPOSITE BOYD, JENNIFER A 1786 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Dec 19, 2022
17908408 MEDICAL HONEYCOMB STRUCTURE AND METHOD FOR PRODUCING THE SAME, MEDICAL TISSUE RECONSTRUCTION BAG, AND MOLDING DIE BLANCO, JAVIER G 3774 §103§112 Final Rejection 10d overdue Pending Aug 31, 2022

Managing GC Corporation's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month