Prosecution Insights
Prosecution Insights
8 pending office actions • 1 art units • 7 examiners • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 39 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 8 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 8 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 4 (50%) |
| §102 only | 4 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| CHOI, WILLIAM C | 2 | 92.6% | +4.1% |
| JORDAN, DANIEL JEFFERY | 1 | 60.8% | -13.4% |
| COLLINS, DARRYL J | 1 | 89.0% | +4.9% |
| NIGAM, NATASHA | 1 | 65.6% | +29.2% |
| HUANG, WEN | 1 | 81.6% | +23.5% |
| HUSTOFT, JUSTIN WAYNE | 1 | 68.3% | +17.0% |
| JONES, JENNIFER ANN | 1 | 68.1% | +20.3% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18646782 | OPTICAL IMAGING LENS | COLLINS, DARRYL J | 5d overdue |
| 18645388 | OPTICAL IMAGING LENS | CHOI, WILLIAM C | 34d |
| 18735677 | OPTICAL IMAGING LENS | CHOI, WILLIAM C | 63d |
| 18631824 | OPTICAL IMAGING LENS | HUANG, WEN | 71d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17861272 | OPTICAL IMAGING LENS | JONES, JENNIFER ANN | 91d overdue |
| 17861267 | OPTICAL IMAGING LENS | HUSTOFT, JUSTIN WAYNE | 73d overdue |
| 18637471 | OPTICAL ELEMENT FOR MULTIPLE REFLECTIONS OF STRAY LIGHT | NIGAM, NATASHA | 23d |
| 18631824 | OPTICAL IMAGING LENS | HUANG, WEN | 71d |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 2872 | 8 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18735677 | OPTICAL IMAGING LENS | CHOI, WILLIAM C | 2872 | §102 | Non-Final OA | 63d | Pending | Jun 06, 2024 |
| 18669550 | OPTICAL IMAGING LENS | JORDAN, DANIEL JEFFERY | 2872 | §103 | Final Rejection | 62d | Pending | May 21, 2024 |
| 18646782 | OPTICAL IMAGING LENS | COLLINS, DARRYL J | 2872 | §102 | Non-Final OA | 5d overdue | Pending | Apr 26, 2024 |
| 18645388 | OPTICAL IMAGING LENS | CHOI, WILLIAM C | 2872 | §102 | Non-Final OA | 34d | Pending | Apr 25, 2024 |
| 18637471 | OPTICAL ELEMENT FOR MULTIPLE REFLECTIONS OF STRAY LIGHT | NIGAM, NATASHA | 2872 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 23d | Pending | Apr 17, 2024 |
| 18631824 | OPTICAL IMAGING LENS | HUANG, WEN | 2872 | §102 | Non-Final OA | 71d | Pending | Apr 10, 2024 |
| 17861267 | OPTICAL IMAGING LENS | HUSTOFT, JUSTIN WAYNE | 2872 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 73d overdue | Pending | Jul 11, 2022 |
| 17861272 | OPTICAL IMAGING LENS | JONES, JENNIFER ANN | 2872 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 91d overdue | Pending | Jul 11, 2022 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial