Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Nunhems B.V.

Technology area: Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals

12 pending office actions • 2 art units • 11 examiners • 0 of 12 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 29 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Nunhems B.V. is managing 12 pending office actions in the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals technology area. These 12 actions are distributed among 11 distinct examiners, indicating that the pending matters are being reviewed by many different officials. This distribution of 11 distinct examiners for 12 pending office actions requires the company to engage with a variety of individual examiner styles and technical viewpoints. Practitioners must be prepared to navigate these different perspectives across the Biotechnology & Pharmaceuticals portfolio.

The portfolio is concentrated within 2 distinct art units, which suggests that the company's biotechnology innovations are focused on specific technical categories. Matthew R Keogh is the busiest examiner for the portfolio, currently overseeing 2 pending office actions. This makes him responsible for 2 of the 12 total pending actions. The presence of 2 distinct art units indicates that the company's research is categorized into a limited number of specialized administrative groups within the USPTO.

With 11 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units, the prosecution environment involves many individual perspectives within a narrow administrative range. The company must coordinate its strategy across the 2 different administrative divisions to ensure consistency. The presence of 12 pending office actions across 11 distinct examiners highlights the need for a flexible approach to meet various procedural expectations. Applicants should focus on the specific requirements of the 2 distinct art units while addressing the feedback from the 11 distinct examiners involved. Matthew R Keogh represents a point of overlap with 2 actions.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

12
Total Pending OAs
8
Non-Final OAs
4
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 7 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
1
Due this week
2
Due this month
2
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 7 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 7 days (1)Due ≤ 30 days (2)Due ≤ 60 days (2)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (17%)
2
Medium (17%)
8
Easy (67%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§112 only7 (58%)
Double-patenting only1 (8%)
Double-patenting + other2 (17%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (17%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

10
Life Sciences
83% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
2
Business / Other
17% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

120 h
Manual time on pending OAs
24 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
42 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
1.1 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
KEOGH, MATTHEW R 2 78.3% +14.5%
FAN, WEIHUA 1 83.4% +12.6%
MCWILLIAMS, KELSEY LYNN 1 88.9% +5.8%
MEADOWS, CHRISTINA L 1 76.1% +23.2%
KALLIS, RUSSELL 1 86.9% +7.9%
IBRAHIM, MEDINA AHMED 1 87.4% +12.2%
RADOSAVLJEVIC, ALEKSANDAR 1 81.7% +8.7%
BUI, PHUONG T 1 81.2% +23.2%
KOVALENKO, MYKOLA V 1 69.5% +25.8%
KINGDON, CATHY 1 80.3% +2.5%

Quick Wins (5)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 5 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18072334 LETTUCE VARIETY NUN 09185 LTL KINGDON, CATHY 32d overdue
18521305 LETTUCE VARIETY NUN 08237 LTL RADOSAVLJEVIC, ALEKSANDAR 6d
18798285 TOMATO VARIETY NUN 00333 TOP MCWILLIAMS, KELSEY LYNN 15d
18605199 WATERMELON VARIETY NUN 32117 WMW KALLIS, RUSSELL 43d
18488781 MELON VARIETY NUN 71570 MEM BUI, PHUONG T —

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18823297 CUCUMBER VARIETY NUN 97080 CUL FAN, WEIHUA 19d
18597524 DOWNY MILDEW RESISTANT LETTUCE MUTANT IBRAHIM, MEDINA AHMED 34d

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18672984 WATERMELON VARIETY NUN 12201 WMW MEADOWS, CHRISTINA L 5d overdue
18823297 CUCUMBER VARIETY NUN 97080 CUL FAN, WEIHUA 19d
18597524 DOWNY MILDEW RESISTANT LETTUCE MUTANT IBRAHIM, MEDINA AHMED 34d
19000570 TOMATO VARIETY NUN 00343 TOP KEOGH, MATTHEW R —
19000569 WATERMELON VARIETY NUN 32202 WMW KEOGH, MATTHEW R —
18488781 MELON VARIETY NUN 71570 MEM BUI, PHUONG T —
18342484 SPECIES OF TOBAMOVIRUS KOVALENKO, MYKOLA V —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1663 7
1662 3

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19000570 TOMATO VARIETY NUN 00343 TOP KEOGH, MATTHEW R — §112 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 23, 2024
19000569 WATERMELON VARIETY NUN 32202 WMW KEOGH, MATTHEW R — §112 Non-Final OA — Pending Dec 23, 2024
18823297 CUCUMBER VARIETY NUN 97080 CUL FAN, WEIHUA 1663 §102§103§112 Non-Final OA 19d Pending Sep 03, 2024
18798285 TOMATO VARIETY NUN 00333 TOP MCWILLIAMS, KELSEY LYNN 1663 §112 Non-Final OA 15d Pending Aug 08, 2024
18672984 WATERMELON VARIETY NUN 12201 WMW MEADOWS, CHRISTINA L 1663 §112 Non-Final OA 5d overdue Pending May 23, 2024
18605199 WATERMELON VARIETY NUN 32117 WMW KALLIS, RUSSELL 1663 §112 Non-Final OA 43d Pending Mar 14, 2024
18597524 DOWNY MILDEW RESISTANT LETTUCE MUTANT IBRAHIM, MEDINA AHMED 1662 §103§112Other Non-Final OA 34d Pending Mar 06, 2024
18521305 LETTUCE VARIETY NUN 08237 LTL RADOSAVLJEVIC, ALEKSANDAR 1662 §112 Final Rejection 6d Pending Nov 28, 2023
18488781 MELON VARIETY NUN 71570 MEM BUI, PHUONG T 1663 DP Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 17, 2023
18342484 SPECIES OF TOBAMOVIRUS KOVALENKO, MYKOLA V 1662 DPOther Final Rejection — Pending Jun 27, 2023
18072334 LETTUCE VARIETY NUN 09185 LTL KINGDON, CATHY 1663 §102§112DP Non-Final OA 32d overdue Pending Nov 30, 2022
17924321 TOMATO PLANTS HAVING SUPPRESSED MEIOTIC RECOMBINATION SPEED, DEQUANTARIUS JAVON 1663 §112 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 09, 2022

Managing Nunhems B.V.'s Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month