8 pending office actions • 8 art units • 8 examiners • 0 of 8 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 18 patents granted in the last 365 days
Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 7 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.
Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 7 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 8 (100%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| RINES, ROBERT D | 1 | 38.4% | +46.4% |
| AYERS, MICHAEL W | 1 | 70.2% | +53.7% |
| LANE, GREGORY A | 1 | 74.5% | -0.2% |
| TOLENTINO, RODERICK | 1 | 77.5% | +35.2% |
| MAYE, AYUB A | 1 | 57.7% | +41.7% |
| KORSAK, OLEG | 1 | 85.6% | +8.4% |
| SAVENKOV, VADIM | 1 | 61.7% | +20.6% |
| CATTUNGAL, DEREENA T | 1 | 80.1% | +30.4% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16940059 | THREAT MITIGATION SYSTEM AND METHOD | CATTUNGAL, DEREENA T | 27d |
| 18130218 | THREAT MITIGATION SYSTEM AND METHOD | KORSAK, OLEG | 75d |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 6 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18585510 | THREAT MITIGATION SYSTEM AND METHOD | MAYE, AYUB A | 72d overdue |
| 19272109 | Threat Mitigation System and Method | RINES, ROBERT D | 10d overdue |
| 16939973 | THREAT MITIGATION SYSTEM AND METHOD | SAVENKOV, VADIM | 5d overdue |
| 16940059 | THREAT MITIGATION SYSTEM AND METHOD | CATTUNGAL, DEREENA T | 27d |
| 18891195 | THREAT MITIGATION SYSTEM AND METHOD | TOLENTINO, RODERICK | 35d |
| 19272168 | Threat Mitigation System and Method | AYERS, MICHAEL W | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 3625 | 1 |
| 2195 | 1 |
| 2438 | 1 |
| 2439 | 1 |
| 2436 | 1 |
| 2492 | 1 |
| 2432 | 1 |
| 2431 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 19272109 | Threat Mitigation System and Method | RINES, ROBERT D | 3625 | §103 | Final Rejection | 10d overdue | Pending | Jul 17, 2025 |
| 19272168 | Threat Mitigation System and Method | AYERS, MICHAEL W | 2195 | §103 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Jul 17, 2025 |
| 19270776 | Threat Mitigation System and Method | LANE, GREGORY A | 2438 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 23d overdue | Pending | Jul 16, 2025 |
| 18891195 | THREAT MITIGATION SYSTEM AND METHOD | TOLENTINO, RODERICK | 2439 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 35d | Pending | Sep 20, 2024 |
| 18585510 | THREAT MITIGATION SYSTEM AND METHOD | MAYE, AYUB A | 2436 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 72d overdue | Pending | Feb 23, 2024 |
| 18130218 | THREAT MITIGATION SYSTEM AND METHOD | KORSAK, OLEG | 2492 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 75d | Pending | Apr 03, 2023 |
| 16939973 | THREAT MITIGATION SYSTEM AND METHOD | SAVENKOV, VADIM | 2432 | §103 | Non-Final OA | 5d overdue | Pending | Jul 27, 2020 |
| 16940059 | THREAT MITIGATION SYSTEM AND METHOD | CATTUNGAL, DEREENA T | 2431 | §103 | Final Rejection | 27d | Pending | Jul 27, 2020 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial