Prosecution Insights
Last updated: August 18, 2026

ReliaQuest Holdings LLC

10 pending office actions • 7 art units • 10 examiners • 0 of 10 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 9 patents granted in the last 365 days

Portfolio Summary

10
Total Pending OAs
8
Non-Final OAs
2
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

2
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
1
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Overdue (2)Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (1)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (20%)
6
Medium (60%)
2
Easy (20%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§101 + other2 (20%)
§103 only5 (50%)
Double-patenting only2 (20%)
Double-patenting + other1 (10%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
8
Information Tech
80% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
2
Business / Other
20% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

100 h
Manual time on pending OAs
20 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
35 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.9 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
AYERS, MICHAEL W 1 70.4% +53.1%
LANE, GREGORY A 1 74.9% -0.6%
HENNING, MATTHEW T 1 71.1% +18.3%
TRAN, TRI MINH 1 81.8% +34.4%
SAADOUN, HASSAN 1 91.5% -0.4%
HAILU, TESHOME 1 78.1% +23.5%
REVAK, CHRISTOPHER A 1 89.3% +8.6%
TOLENTINO, RODERICK 1 77.6% +35.2%
MAYE, AYUB A 1 57.8% +42.1%
CATTUNGAL, DEREENA T 1 80.2% +29.3%

Quick Wins (4)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
16940059 THREAT MITIGATION SYSTEM AND METHOD CATTUNGAL, DEREENA T 27d
19215812 THREAT MITIGATION SYSTEM AND METHOD TRAN, TRI MINH
19208089 THREAT MITIGATION SYSTEM AND METHOD SAADOUN, HASSAN
19088619 THREAT MITIGATION SYSTEM AND METHOD REVAK, CHRISTOPHER A

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
19272168 Threat Mitigation System and Method AYERS, MICHAEL W
19179170 THREAT MITIGATION SYSTEM AND METHOD HAILU, TESHOME

Interview Candidates (7)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 7 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
18585510 THREAT MITIGATION SYSTEM AND METHOD MAYE, AYUB A 72d overdue
16940059 THREAT MITIGATION SYSTEM AND METHOD CATTUNGAL, DEREENA T 27d
18891195 THREAT MITIGATION SYSTEM AND METHOD TOLENTINO, RODERICK 35d
19272168 Threat Mitigation System and Method AYERS, MICHAEL W
19271029 Threat Mitigation System and Method HENNING, MATTHEW T
19215812 THREAT MITIGATION SYSTEM AND METHOD TRAN, TRI MINH
19179170 THREAT MITIGATION SYSTEM AND METHOD HAILU, TESHOME

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2431 2
2195 1
2438 1
2491 1
2434 1
2439 1
2436 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
19272168 Threat Mitigation System and Method AYERS, MICHAEL W 2195 §101§103§112 Non-Final OA Pending Jul 17, 2025
19270776 Threat Mitigation System and Method LANE, GREGORY A 2438 §103 Non-Final OA 23d overdue Pending Jul 16, 2025
19271029 Threat Mitigation System and Method HENNING, MATTHEW T 2491 §103 Non-Final OA Pending Jul 16, 2025
19215812 THREAT MITIGATION SYSTEM AND METHOD TRAN, TRI MINH DP Non-Final OA Pending May 22, 2025
19208089 THREAT MITIGATION SYSTEM AND METHOD SAADOUN, HASSAN 2431 §103Other Non-Final OA Pending May 14, 2025
19179170 THREAT MITIGATION SYSTEM AND METHOD HAILU, TESHOME 2434 §101§103DP Non-Final OA Pending Apr 15, 2025
19088619 THREAT MITIGATION SYSTEM AND METHOD REVAK, CHRISTOPHER A DP Non-Final OA Pending Mar 24, 2025
18891195 THREAT MITIGATION SYSTEM AND METHOD TOLENTINO, RODERICK 2439 §103Other Final Rejection 35d Pending Sep 20, 2024
18585510 THREAT MITIGATION SYSTEM AND METHOD MAYE, AYUB A 2436 §103 Final Rejection 72d overdue Pending Feb 23, 2024
16940059 THREAT MITIGATION SYSTEM AND METHOD CATTUNGAL, DEREENA T 2431 §103DP Non-Final OA 27d Pending Jul 27, 2020

Managing ReliaQuest Holdings LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month