Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

Rohm and Haas Electronic Materials LLC

Technology area: Chemistry & Materials

7 pending office actions • 4 art units • 6 examiners • 0 of 7 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready • 9 patents granted in the last 365 days

Analysis

Rohm and Haas Electronic Materials LLC currently faces 7 pending office actions in the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These matters are assigned to 6 distinct examiners across 4 distinct art units. This structure indicates that while the portfolio is concentrated within a specific technology sector, the prosecution is spread across several specialized groups at the patent office.

CHAMPION, RICHARD DAVID serves as the busiest examiner for the company, managing 2 pending office actions. The remaining pending actions are distributed among the other distinct examiners, contributing to the total of 6 involved in the portfolio. This distribution suggests that most examiners are handling a single case each, providing a broad exposure to different examiner perspectives within the 4 distinct art units.

The presence of 7 pending office actions across these units implies that some groups are handling multiple filings. Practitioners should evaluate the specific requirements of the Chemistry & Materials field to optimize responses. The reliance on 2 pending actions for the busiest examiner ensures that the portfolio's success is not overly dependent on the discretion of a single individual.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

7
Total Pending OAs
1
Non-Final OAs
6
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

0
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
3
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Deadline Fire Line

Every pending office action with a known statutory deadline, placed on a days-until-due axis. Dots left of Today are overdue; the further right, the more runway. Cases that share a deadline window stack vertically. 4 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date.

-30dToday30d60d90d120d
Due ≤ 30 days (1)Due ≤ 60 days (3)

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

2
Hard (29%)
5
Medium (71%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only5 (71%)
Multi-statute (no §101)2 (29%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

7
Life Sciences
100% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
0
Communications
0% of docket
0
Semiconductors
0% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

70 h
Manual time on pending OAs
14 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
24 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.6 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
CHAMPION, RICHARD DAVID 2 45.7% +11.9%
KARST, DAVID THOMAS 1 64.7% +9.8%
LEE, RIP A 1 83.5% -4.2%
TRAYWICK, ANDREW PRESTON 1 71.7% +27.3%
SHUKLA, KRUPA 1 15.2% +22.6%
MALLOY, ANNA E 1 46.5% -3.9%

Hard Cases (2)

Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17631527 THIN FLEXIBLE GLASS COVER WITH A FRAGMENT RETENTION HARD COATING SHUKLA, KRUPA 14d
18482295 HIGH REFRACTIVE INDEX MATERIALS LEE, RIP A —

Interview Candidates (4)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17631527 THIN FLEXIBLE GLASS COVER WITH A FRAGMENT RETENTION HARD COATING SHUKLA, KRUPA 14d
17462216 PHOTORESIST COMPOSITIONS AND PATTERN FORMATION METHODS CHAMPION, RICHARD DAVID 42d
16731666 POLYMERS AND PHOTORESIST COMPOSITIONS CHAMPION, RICHARD DAVID 42d
18082025 PHOTORESIST TOPCOAT COMPOSITIONS AND PATTERN FORMATION METHODS TRAYWICK, ANDREW PRESTON —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
1737 4
1767 1
1766 1
1787 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18521544 POLYMERS USEFUL AS SURFACE LEVELING AGENTS KARST, DAVID THOMAS 1767 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Nov 28, 2023
18482295 HIGH REFRACTIVE INDEX MATERIALS LEE, RIP A 1766 §102§103 Non-Final OA — Pending Oct 06, 2023
18082025 PHOTORESIST TOPCOAT COMPOSITIONS AND PATTERN FORMATION METHODS TRAYWICK, ANDREW PRESTON 1737 §103 Final Rejection — Pending Dec 15, 2022
17631527 THIN FLEXIBLE GLASS COVER WITH A FRAGMENT RETENTION HARD COATING SHUKLA, KRUPA 1787 §103§112 Final Rejection 14d Pending Jan 31, 2022
17490923 IODINE-CONTAINING ACID CLEAVABLE COMPOUNDS, POLYMERS DERIVED THEREFROM, AND PHOTORESIST COMPOSITIONS MALLOY, ANNA E 1737 §103 Final Rejection 35d Pending Sep 30, 2021
17462216 PHOTORESIST COMPOSITIONS AND PATTERN FORMATION METHODS CHAMPION, RICHARD DAVID 1737 §103 Final Rejection 42d Pending Aug 31, 2021
16731666 POLYMERS AND PHOTORESIST COMPOSITIONS CHAMPION, RICHARD DAVID 1737 §103 Final Rejection 42d Pending Dec 31, 2019

Managing Rohm and Haas Electronic Materials LLC's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month