Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 04, 2026

UBRIGHT OPTRONICS CORPORATION

Technology areas: Communications • Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics

5 pending office actions • 4 art units • 4 examiners • 0 of 5 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready

Analysis

UBRIGHT OPTRONICS CORPORATION is navigating 5 pending office actions within the Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics technology area. These actions are being reviewed by 4 distinct examiners, indicating some concentration of the workload. Specifically, the busiest examiner, LEE, MATTHEW Y, is responsible for 2 of the pending office actions. This concentration makes the interactions with this specific examiner a significant factor in the portfolio's overall progress.

The 5 pending office actions are distributed across 4 distinct art units. This suggests that the company's semiconductor and optics innovations fall under several different examination categories. While LEE, MATTHEW Y handles 2 actions, the other pending matters are distributed among the remaining distinct examiners. This requires the legal team to adapt to different examiner perspectives across the 4 art units.

With a total of 5 pending office actions, the prosecution strategy must be robust enough to handle multiple simultaneous reviews. The fact that 4 distinct art units are involved highlights the technical diversity of the filings. Practitioners should prioritize the interactions under LEE, MATTHEW Y, as these represent the largest single block of pending work in the current Semiconductors, Circuits & Optics portfolio.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Portfolio Summary

5
Total Pending OAs
4
Non-Final OAs
1
Final Rejections
0
Advisory / Quayle

Response Deadline Pressure

Based on the USPTO statutory response window for each pending office action. 2 of the docket's apps have a known mailing date; the rest are excluded from the tile counts.

1
Overdue
0
Due this week
1
Due this month
0
Due in next 60 days
0
Due later

Case Difficulty Mix

Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.

0
Hard (0%)
5
Medium (100%)
0
Easy (0%)
0
Unknown (0%)

Rejection Statute Mix

BucketCases
§103 only5 (100%)

Industry Mix

How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.

0
Life Sciences
0% of docket
0
Information Tech
0% of docket
2
Communications
40% of docket
3
Semiconductors
60% of docket
0
Mechanical / Eng
0% of docket
0
Business / Other
0% of docket

Time-on-OA Estimate

Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.

50 h
Manual time on pending OAs
10 h
Time saved (low, 20%)
18 h
Time saved (mid, 35%)
0.4 wks
FTE-weeks freed (mid)

Top Examiners on this docket

ExaminerApps on this docketAllow rateInterview lift
LEE, MATTHEW Y 2 81.5% +18.3%
MCKINNEY, ANGELICA M 1 85.2% +13.9%
KANG, ANNABELLE 1 89.3% -7.6%
CULBERT, CHRISTOPHER A 1 42.2% +7.7%

Quick Wins (4)

Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17975637 OPTICAL FILM AND THE METHOD TO MAKE THE SAME LEE, MATTHEW Y 8d overdue
18198845 OPTICAL STRUCTURE AND THE METHOD TO MAKE THE SAME LEE, MATTHEW Y 15d
18585073 SPEAKER MCKINNEY, ANGELICA M —
18200581 PLANAR PIEZOELECTRIC VIBRATION MODULE KANG, ANNABELLE —

Interview Candidates (3)

Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 3 ordered by deadline are shown.

App #TitleExaminerDue in
17975637 OPTICAL FILM AND THE METHOD TO MAKE THE SAME LEE, MATTHEW Y 8d overdue
18198845 OPTICAL STRUCTURE AND THE METHOD TO MAKE THE SAME LEE, MATTHEW Y 15d
18585073 SPEAKER MCKINNEY, ANGELICA M —

Top Art Units

Art UnitApps
2872 2
2694 1
2695 1
2815 1

Pending Office Actions

App #TitleExaminerArt UnitStatutesStatusDue inAIFiled
18585073 SPEAKER MCKINNEY, ANGELICA M 2694 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Feb 23, 2024
18200581 PLANAR PIEZOELECTRIC VIBRATION MODULE KANG, ANNABELLE 2695 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending May 23, 2023
18198845 OPTICAL STRUCTURE AND THE METHOD TO MAKE THE SAME LEE, MATTHEW Y 2872 §103 Final Rejection 15d Pending May 18, 2023
17975637 OPTICAL FILM AND THE METHOD TO MAKE THE SAME LEE, MATTHEW Y 2872 §103 Non-Final OA 8d overdue Pending Oct 28, 2022
17859021 COMPOSITE QUANTUM-DOT OPTICAL FILM AND THE METHOD TO MAKE THE SAME CULBERT, CHRISTOPHER A 2815 §103 Non-Final OA — Pending Jul 07, 2022

Managing UBRIGHT OPTRONICS CORPORATION's Patent Portfolio?

IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.

Start Free Trial

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month