Technology area: Chemistry & Materials
4 pending office actions • 2 art units • 2 examiners • 0 of 4 (0%) have an AI response strategy ready
Xetos AG currently manages 4 pending office actions within the Chemistry & Materials technology area. These 4 pending office actions are spread across 2 distinct examiners and 2 distinct art units, which indicates a relatively high volume of activity for a portfolio of this size. For the practitioner, managing 4 pending office actions requires careful coordination across the different examiners. The Chemistry & Materials technology area often involves complex technical requirements, and the presence of multiple pending actions suggests an active effort to secure patent protection for various innovations within the company's portfolio.
The busiest examiner for this portfolio is ANGEBRANNDT, MARTIN J, who is responsible for 3 busiest examiner pending actions. This means that 3 busiest examiner pending actions are concentrated with a single examiner, making ANGEBRANNDT, MARTIN J the most influential figure in the company's current prosecution. The remaining workload is handled by the other examiner, but the primary focus for the practitioner should be on the preferences and patterns of ANGEBRANNDT, MARTIN J. Navigating the 2 distinct art units will also be necessary, but the high concentration of 3 busiest examiner pending actions with one examiner allows for a more unified strategy for the majority of the pending workload.
Difficulty is derived from the rejection statutes on the most recent pending office action. §101-driven and multi-statute cases are graded Hard; §112-only and obviousness-type double-patenting cases are graded Easy; everything else is Medium. "Unknown" means we have not yet parsed a statute for that office action.
| Bucket | Cases |
|---|---|
| §103 only | 1 (25%) |
| Double-patenting + other | 1 (25%) |
| Multi-statute (no §101) | 2 (50%) |
How the docket's pending cases split across USPTO tech-center bands.
Manual office-action response work runs about 10 hours per case. The time-saved bands below show what IP Author's prosecution pipeline typically delivers — a conservative 20% on the low end, 35% in the middle, 50% on the high end.
| Examiner | Apps on this docket | Allow rate | Interview lift |
|---|---|---|---|
| ANGEBRANNDT, MARTIN J | 3 | 55.5% | +34.0% |
| EOFF, ANCA | 1 | 80.0% | +10.8% |
Cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate of 80%+ where the difficulty is Easy or Medium. The top 1 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18276776 | Photopolymerizable Composition | EOFF, ANCA | — |
Multi-statute / §101-driven matters, or cases in front of an examiner with an allow rate under 30%. The top 2 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18276767 | Photopolymerizable HOE Composition | ANGEBRANNDT, MARTIN J | — |
| 18276755 | 2K-System | ANGEBRANNDT, MARTIN J | — |
Cases in front of an examiner whose interview lift is 10 percentage points or more — i.e. interviewed cases historically resolve more favorably than non-interviewed ones. The top 4 ordered by deadline are shown.
| App # | Title | Examiner | Due in |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18276776 | Photopolymerizable Composition | EOFF, ANCA | — |
| 18276767 | Photopolymerizable HOE Composition | ANGEBRANNDT, MARTIN J | — |
| 18276755 | 2K-System | ANGEBRANNDT, MARTIN J | — |
| 18276746 | Fading | ANGEBRANNDT, MARTIN J | — |
| Art Unit | Apps |
|---|---|
| 1737 | 3 |
| 1722 | 1 |
| App # | Title | Examiner | Art Unit | Statutes | Status | Due in | AI | Filed |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18276776 | Photopolymerizable Composition | EOFF, ANCA | 1722 | §103 | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Aug 10, 2023 |
| 18276767 | Photopolymerizable HOE Composition | ANGEBRANNDT, MARTIN J | 1737 | §103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 10, 2023 |
| 18276755 | 2K-System | ANGEBRANNDT, MARTIN J | 1737 | §102§103§112 | Non-Final OA | — | Pending | Aug 10, 2023 |
| 18276746 | Fading | ANGEBRANNDT, MARTIN J | 1737 | §102§103DP | Final Rejection | — | Pending | Aug 10, 2023 |
IP Author helps IP teams respond to office actions faster with AI-generated responses, examiner analytics, and prosecution intelligence.
Start Free Trial