Prosecution Insights
Last updated: October 26, 2026

Jason W Blust, USPTO Patent Examiner

Listed by the USPTO as BLUST, JASON W

Tech Center 2100 • Art Units: 2132 2137

This examiner grants 79% of resolved cases

Analysis

BLUST, JASON W is assigned to Technology Center 2100 and art unit 2132. The profile includes 290 resolved cases and a 79.3% allowance rate. The median time to allowance is 857 days. Interview lift is 14.9%, showing a positive association that is useful but not overwhelming in the recorded matters.

The listed companies are Intel Corporation, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. The listed firms are Compass IP Law PC, FISH & RICHARDSON P.C. (TC), and Harrity & Harrity, LLP. Practitioners can use the allowance history to set expectations and consider interviews as one component of a broader, technically focused prosecution approach.

Written from this page's own data; every figure is computed from USPTO records and verified before publication.

Performance Statistics

79.3%
Allow Rate
+24.3% vs TC avg
318
Total Applications
+14.9%
Interview Lift
857
Avg Prosecution Days
Based on 290 resolved cases, 2023–2026

Rejection Statute Breakdown

7.0%
§101 Eligibility
22.0%
§102 Novelty
49.5%
§103 Obviousness
13.3%
§112 Clarity

Currently Pending Office Actions

App #TitleStatusAssignee
18988551 STORAGE DEVICE PERFORMING PRE-PROGRAM OPERATION AND PROGRAM METHOD THEREOF Final Rejection SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD.
19078854 Data Operation Method and Apparatus, and Device Final Rejection Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
18102053 USING EMBEDDINGS, GENERATED USING ROBOT ACTION MODELS, IN CONTROLLING ROBOT TO PERFORM ROBOTIC TASK Final Rejection GDM Holding LLC
18967151 PRIORITIZING COMMANDS IN A COMMAND QUEUE FOR A SYSTEM MEMORY MANAGEMENT UNIT Final Rejection QUALCOMM Incorporated
18107980 METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR OFFLOADING MEMORY/STORAGE SHARDING FROM CPU RESOURCES Final Rejection Intel Corporation
18067779 SNOOP FILTER FOR LARGE CACHE USING HASH TECHNIQUE WITH OPTIMAL REFRESH ALGORITHM Final Rejection Intel Corporation
19174159 INDIRECT MEMORY ACCESS USING SHARED POINTER Non-Final OA Micron Technology, Inc.
18933236 STORAGE OPTIMIZATION VIA DATA DEDUPLICATION Final Rejection Dell Products L.P.

Facing This Examiner?

IP Author analyzes examiner patterns and generates tailored response strategies with the highest chance of allowance.

Build Your Strategy

Who Appears Before This Examiner

Top companies before this examiner

Law firms appearing most often

Frequently Asked Questions

What is examiner Jason W Blust's allowance rate?

79.3% of resolved applications examined by Jason W Blust were allowed (290 resolved cases), compared with 73.3% across Art Unit 2132 over the last five years.

Does an interview help with examiner Jason W Blust?

This examiner's interview lift is +14.9 percentage points: the difference in allowance rate between resolved applications that had an examiner interview and those that did not.

How long does examiner Jason W Blust take to allow a patent?

Applications allowed by Jason W Blust took 857 days on average from filing to allowance.

Which art unit does examiner Jason W Blust work in?

Jason W Blust examines applications in Art Unit 2132 in Tech Center 2100 (Computing & Software).

Sign in with your work email

Enter your email to receive a magic link. No password needed.

Personal email addresses (Gmail, Yahoo, etc.) are not accepted.

Free tier: 3 strategy analyses per month